This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Experiences using struct gcc_target
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Subject: Re: Experiences using struct gcc_target
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 05 Jul 2001 09:51:58 -0300
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107050904130.26541-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
On Jul 5, 2001, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Similarly, you should make it declare union tree_node; and use union
> tree_node * instead of tree. (But the documentation should still use
> "tree" and "rtx" when it documents the hooks with @deftypefn.)
Perhaps we should have alternate headers akin to C++'s <iosfwd> that
#defined rtx and tree (or just `typedef'ed them) without actually
defining the underlying types.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me