This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 01 Jul 2001 11:04:12 -0300
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20010630155951.B17670@lucon.org><20010630172344.B10718@stanford.edu> <20010630222620.B22998@lucon.org>
On Jul 1, 2001, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> Do you seriously believe
> # ./configure
> # make
> # su
> # make install
> should override a system DSO which may be used by every single binary
> on the system?
I don't think it should. In fact, I don't think it does right now.
At least, I wouldn't expect to find any system DSO in /usr/local/lib,
which is where I believe libgcc_s.so would be installed with the
commands above.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me