This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Question re: SSA Aggressive Dead Code Elimination

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> > Nope.  What we ended up having was a trivially dead phi term.
> 
> You are making the same mistake I did.
> The phi term *isn't* trivially dead. And  because it's not dead, the jump
> instruction in the block the phi node has for that term, should be marked
> important, so it doesn't become unconditional.
> 
Yup.  I can't read RTL to save my life.


Thanks.  Diego.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]