This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Suggested replacement for specs and switch handling
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Suggested replacement for specs and switch handling
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:43:47 -0400
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010624122041.Q3048@stanford.edu>
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:20:41PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> [Why on earth does g++ process .c and .i files with the C++ compiler?]
Isn't that one of the two purposes of using g++ over gcc? Not only to add
the C++ libraries to the link line, but also to force the language to C++
instead of relying on filenames?
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC