This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Missing documentation

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Missing documentation
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:34:11 -0400
Cc: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, zackw at stanford dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010609141916.W979@stanford.edu> <20010609234849.B17706@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010609162126D.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 04:21:26PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
>     Neil> This documents -fpreprocessed (and removes an unnecessary
>     Neil> comment about trigraphs being brain-damaged.  I can't argue
>     Neil> with that, but I don't think it belongs in the manual).
> 
> The manual is definitely not a soapbox.

Then we can throw out that annoying "Linux and the GNU Project" chapter?


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Missing documentation
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Missing documentation
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Missing documentation
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Missing documentation
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]