This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE

To: fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au
Subject: Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 08:54:17 -0700
Cc: nathan at codesourcery dot com, pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason_merrill at redhat dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010605153732.A22793@disaster.jaj.com><3B1DE133.1934D3B4@codesourcery.com><20010607055415.A11566@hg.cs.mu.oz.au>

>>>>> "Fergus" == Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> writes:
 
   Fergus> Defining _GNU_SOURCE even when -ansi is specified is a
   Fergus> bug, isn't it? 

Yes.  All of the messing about with os_defines.h and
CPP_CPLUSPLUS_PREDEFINES is entirely broken in the long run.

It is a short-term hack to allow V3 to work with GCC 3.0.  The task of
fixing the library so that these things are not needed should be
extremely high-priority for the V3 team in GCC 3.1.  There is
certainly no more important missing feature, other than the C header
issues.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]