This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How bad is fast-math?
Jean Francois Martinez <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 01:02, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 12:25:50AM +0200, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > > According to the doc fast-math generates incorrect code. Has the
> > > situation changed? In case it has doc should be updated, in case it
> > > hasn't name should be changed and become something derogatory since there
> > > are people who see the fast in fast-math and use it without further
> > > investigation. It is being used in aLinux distribution and I have seen
> > > it recommended in a Linux magazine
> > In general, it depends on what you consider the correct code to be :-)
> > If your code never encounters infinities and denormals, and never passes an
> > out of range argument to an intrinsic function, then -ffast-math will
> > certainly generate faster code on some machines. I can't say how well that
> > matches up with the numeric code out there. I would imagine many codes
> > don't stray into these dark corners (but then again, many do go into that
> > territory).
> Use in glibc would be certainly foolish. And I think it is being done.
If you think so, then send a bug report to the glibc folks.
But I'm convinced that glibc never uses -ffast-math.