This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC
- To: dann at godzilla dot ICS dot UCI dot EDU, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC
- From: dewar at gnat dot com
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 14:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Now speaking of benchmarks and methodology, I thought the SPECFP95
suite came with a contract requiring the results to be posted in
certain format, including an overall weighted averyage from running
all the tests (i.e. you are not allowed to publish selected results),
but perhaps this is a misconception or is no longer in force?