This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()



> Yes.  You can autoconf check for that, as it exists in glibc.
> We provide a fallback version of atoq already; that can be
> replaced.

What's the point of adding complexity just to sometimes not use a
function we already have?  Is there harm in always using the function
we have?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]