This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: compatibility Clarification

To: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Subject: Re: compatibility Clarification
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Date: 22 May 2001 23:20:13 +0200
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, rth at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, madhu dot srinivasan at oracle dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at redhat dot com, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
References: <yddititfvbr.fsf@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <20010522124723M.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <15114.50845.898870.209394@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

| >   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-03/msg00281.html
| > 
| > Please send mail to libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org.  I am sorry that you
| > haven't gotten a reply yet.  Please indicate that this is a regression
| > from GCC 2.95 as you mention.
| 
| Ok, I'll try again.  Unfortunately, there are serious problems with the
| current dejagnu based testsuite which links all tests with -static (PR
| libstdc++/2841).

If I recall correctly, Benjamin indicates that because of libtool
being gone there are some serious issues trying to link with 
shared libs.  I don't have a clear picture of the whole issue.
Please, anyone who undertands the issue, please feel free to educate
me.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]