This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR 2765
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <email@example.com> writes:
Joseph> On Sat, 19 May 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> I clipped the wrong ChangeLog hunk. It was this bit:
>> else if (require_constant && initializer_constant_valid_p
>> (inside_init, TREE_TYPE (inside_init)) == 0) pedwarn
>> ("initializer element is not computable at load time");
>> That used to be an error.
Joseph> I think Jakub had best work out how to fix the problem.
Either that, or we sacrifice C99 on the altar of C89 regression
I completely agree (see original posting) that this code is a tangle.
Why is this one clause treated differently than all those above it,
which still get errors?
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com