This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA: non-const libcalls

To: rth at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 11:40:24 -0700
Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at cygnus dot co dot uk
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010508060618H.mitchell@codesourcery.com><orwv7mlq7i.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20010512105224.F29134@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

    Richard> This distinction is meaningless.  The call pattern is
    Richard> atomic as far as the compiler is concerned.

Ah, even better.  I was confused by this, which is why asked Alexandre
to explain it -- but if there's no actual distinction, then we can
just remove the paragraph entirely, which will confuse me even
less. :-)

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]