This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: List of simplifications we should perform
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> The drawback of that approach is that you'd then need an ML implementation
> around in order to compile GCC. Unfortunately GCC doesn't have an ML
Yes, that's true. Much like we require the presence of bison for
> There is however another high-level functional language, quite similar
> in many ways to ML, for which there is a GCC front-end...
There you go then. Care to write an optimizer generator in