This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Common Language Runtime
- To: Tim Prince <tprince at computer dot org>
- To: Doug Ransom <dransom at pacificcoast dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Common Language Runtime
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel at ximian dot com>
- Date: 07 May 2001 18:39:48 -0400
> How could there be such a thing as an ECMA instruction set? Maybe a
> system in accordance with Microsoft's submission of CLR to ECMA. They
> claim they have someone working on supporting this on linux, and they
> will use all their muscle to prevent it from going free software, not
> that many free software advocates would touch it with a 10 foot pole.
I have not yet read any report that claims that they are working on
such a beast. It seems like all the miss-information comes from the
fact that they announced that parts of .NET would run on Linux.
These parts were later unveiled to be just the on-the-server side
pieces of Hailstorm, which is not the CLR.
> Besides, various types of free software licenses require distribution of
> source code, whihc is far more useful than a CLR executable.
A CLR executable would be interesting because people on the Windows
platform could use the GCC compilers to generate their CLR-compatible
code (which is what most new stuff will be developed against).