This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
On 07-May-2001, Gerald Pfeifer <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >> Maybe there is a case to put toy into the main tree to avoid this
> >> duplicated effort happening again. I would volunteer to keep it
> >> alive, as I have been doing this for a long time anyway. There
> >> are copyright issues with putting exa into the main tree.
> > Assuming toy is properly assigned, follows the GNU and GCC coding
> > standards, etc., I think its inclusion in the tree would be a good idea.
> I second this and think it would be a nice very nice idea.
I think this would be a good idea too. Apart from anything else,
putting toy in the tree would help clarify and simplify the copyright
issues for any front-end derived from it.
Fergus Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.