This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Inlining of vararg functions
Nathan Sidwell writes:
> The one exception would be the empty function [...] which I guess
> might happen for debug type things with debugging disabled.
Right, that's exactly what I am trying to do: In case debugging is
disabled at compile time, the function has an empty body. So there is
little chance that gcc would support that in the near future? Because
in this case I'll have to revert to pre-processor magic -- what I
wanted to avoid because not all pre-processors support varadic
function macros ...
In any case, thanks a lot for your quick and helpful reply!