This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> From: Mark Mitchell <email@example.com>
> Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 17:22:17 -0700
> We are coming down the home stretch.
I have a random stupid question of the day... Is it really the case
that there are no inlines anywhere in any of the C++ library that
might be taken advantage of by the user, or that any such inlines only
rely upon abi mandated things?
Failure to understand that question, means, we cannot claim C++ abi