This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: finding strict aliasing problems


Mike Stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:

| > Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:38:32 +0200
| > From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
| > To: Joe Buck <jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com>
| 
| > Right, on the other side IMHO making no-strict-aliasing be the
| > default for 3.0 again would be a bad decision - people would be
| > never forced to fix broken sources so we'd stay with
| > no-strict-aliasing forever.
| 
| Let me say that I think that 3.0 should ship with alias analysis
| turned on.  If we do a .0 release every decade, and if we want the .0
| release to have the major changes that might throw people, then,
| clearly, 3.0 should turn it on, otherwise, we have to wait a decade.

I second both Jakub and Mike.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]