gcc archive
date index for May, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2001
23:47 Re: GC development Gerald Pfeifer
22:34 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux David O'Brien
19:35 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Loren James Rittle
18:22 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
18:00 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Geoff Keating
17:25 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
16:14 BLOCK_HEAD Marco
14:58 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Bill Wendling
14:23 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Benjamin Kosnik
14:16 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Neil Booth
14:00 Re: GCC developers and standards development Toon Moene
13:42 Bad Page Jonathan Bartlett
13:25 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
13:16 ARM port bug Denis Chertykov
13:09 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Phil Edwards
12:48 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Geoff Keating
12:43 RE: gcc 2.95.2 on hpux 11 Will Menninger
12:40 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
12:00 Re: How would *you* use an intern? H . J . Lu
11:47 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Dan Nicolaescu
11:33 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Joe Buck
11:22 Re: gcc-3_0-branch, libc6 2.2.3-5(Debian) fails to build libjava Gordon Sadler
11:12 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Neil Booth
11:08 gcc 2.95.2 on hpux 11 V. Mark Lehky
11:07 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Joseph S. Myers
11:05 gcc-3_0-branch, libc6 2.2.3-5(Debian) fails to build libjava Gordon Sadler
11:00 Re: Configuring STD not to use Exceptions Benjamin Kosnik
10:43 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Dan Nicolaescu
10:34 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Michael Matz
10:21 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
10:02 Re: 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Richard Henderson
09:24 Re: 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Teemu Torma
09:14 Re: 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Jan Hubicka
09:13 Re: ELF prelinking (was: Linking speed for C++) Michael Matz
09:11 Re: 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Teemu Torma
09:05 Re: 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Jan Hubicka
08:56 Re: ELF prelinking (was: Linking speed for C++) Michael Matz
08:49 Re: How bad is fast-math? Tim Prince
08:48 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Tim Prince
08:48 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Tim Prince
08:40 Re: [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Joseph S. Myers
08:30 Re: Eliminating POTFILES, etc - can we lose catgets support? Philipp Thomas
08:24 ELF prelinking (was: Linking speed for C++) Jakub Jelinek
07:35 Re: Frame Allocation !!! dewar
07:30 Frame Allocation !!! Antony Selvam
07:14 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
07:07 Re: GC development Fergus Henderson
06:55 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
06:14 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Tim Prince
05:47 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Hildo.Biersma
05:08 [RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
05:06 Configuring STD not to use Exceptions Iszer Vladimir
04:47 GCC Installation problems!!! Fariba Noorbakhsh
04:45 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Fergus Henderson
04:37 3.0-pre crashes on i686 code Teemu Torma
04:31 Re: 3.0 -finline-limit and c++ Teemu Torma
04:26 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:02 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
02:51 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
02:17 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Benjamin Kosnik
02:01 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:00 Re: 3.0 -finline-limit and c++ Nathan Sidwell
00:43 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Zack Weinberg
00:38 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Joseph S. Myers
00:31 Re: How would *you* use an intern? DJ Delorie
00:29 Re: How would *you* use an intern? DJ Delorie
00:24 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Geoff Keating
00:23 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Gerald Pfeifer
00:20 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Zack Weinberg
00:17 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Sylvain Pion
00:10 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Alexandre Oliva
00:06 Re: How would *you* use an intern? DJ Delorie
00:01 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Sylvain Pion

May 30, 2001
22:09 Re: 3.0 -finline-limit and c++ Gerald Pfeifer
21:50 gcc/pself* Gerald Pfeifer
20:53 Re: Finding Aliasing Bugs Zack Weinberg
20:42 Re: Finding Aliasing Bugs dewar
20:25 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Michael Meissner
20:20 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Fergus Henderson
20:12 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Fergus Henderson
20:00 Re: GCC developers and standards development Fergus Henderson
19:54 Re: Finding Aliasing Bugs Zack Weinberg
19:50 Re: Using GCC_EXEC_PREFIX Alexandre Oliva
19:13 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Stan Shebs
19:07 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Stan Shebs
18:57 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Stan Shebs
18:49 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Per Bothner
18:18 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Joseph S. Myers
17:39 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Stephen L Moshier
17:00 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Carlo Wood
16:49 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
16:13 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
16:01 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Joseph S. Myers
16:00 Re: GCC developers and standards development James Dennett
15:48 Using GCC_EXEC_PREFIX Zhi-Wei Lu
15:44 Re: Finding Aliasing Bugs dewar
15:35 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
15:34 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
15:18 Re: How would *you* use an intern? Phil Edwards
14:51 How would *you* use an intern? Stan Shebs
14:48 Finding Aliasing Bugs Bruce Korb
14:09 Re: GCC developers and standards development Michael Meissner
13:55 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Toon Moene
13:50 Re: GCC developers and standards development Laurent Guerby
13:35 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Michael Price
13:31 Re: GCC developers and standards development Gabriel Dos Reis
13:28 Re: -mmmx and -msse are broken [unreviewed patch attached - 3.0 regression] Richard Henderson
13:14 Re: GCC developers and standards development Toon Moene
13:07 GCC developers and standards development Joseph S. Myers
12:30 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
12:27 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Stephen L Moshier
12:15 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
11:58 Re: criteria.html open issues Marc Espie
11:25 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test dewar
11:13 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Michael Price
10:59 Re: How bad is fast-math? Jean Francois Martinez
10:55 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Stephen L Moshier
10:53 Re: gcc and intel ia64 Jim Wilson
10:51 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Brad Lucier
10:28 Re: Question about <limits> Philip Charlton
10:19 Re: Question about <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
10:14 Question about <limits> Philip Charlton
09:53 Re: gcc/INSTALL? Joe Buck
09:51 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Stephen L Moshier
09:44 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Joe Buck
09:27 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
08:35 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test Michael Price
08:13 gcc and intel ia64 Oliver Diedrich
08:11 Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test tprinceusa
07:17 Kahan's Floating Point Test "Paranoia" Michael Price
06:25 Problems with CVS servers today? Alan Lehotsky
05:50 Successfull gcc 2.95.3 build on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Benjamin Heitmann
01:03 Re: How bad is fast-math? Andreas Jaeger

May 29, 2001
23:24 Re: criteria.html open issues Geoff Keating
22:20 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ H . J . Lu
22:05 Re: criteria.html open issues Zack Weinberg
21:57 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Daniel Berlin
20:55 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ H . J . Lu
17:15 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Daniel Berlin
16:59 Re: How bad is fast-math? Michael Meissner
16:58 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
16:33 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Meissner
16:28 Re: How bad is fast-math? Jean Francois Martinez
16:17 Re: How bad is fast-math? Joseph S. Myers
16:14 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
16:02 Re: How bad is fast-math? Michael Meissner
15:56 Re: How bad is fast-math? Geoff Keating
15:44 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Geoff Keating
15:36 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
15:24 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Geoff Keating
15:21 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
15:17 How bad is fast-math? Jean Francois Martinez
15:14 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Dan Nicolaescu
15:09 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
15:05 Re: Cpplib document: Macro Expansion algorithm Neil Booth
15:02 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC dewar
15:02 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
14:55 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Richard Henderson
14:53 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
14:46 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Geoff Keating
14:46 Re: random thought re GC allocator Richard Henderson
14:41 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
14:22 Re: Why strcpy and not strtod? Paolo Carlini
14:03 Cpplib document: Macro Expansion algorithm Gao, Jiafu
14:00 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
13:58 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Michael Matz
13:33 Re: gcc/INSTALL? Joseph S. Myers
13:21 Re: gcc/INSTALL? Laurent Guerby
13:21 Re: Why strcpy and not strtod? Robert Boehne
12:57 Re: gcc/INSTALL? Joseph S. Myers
12:40 gcc/INSTALL? Laurent Guerby
11:50 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Jean Francois Martinez
10:41 Re: stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joe Buck
10:06 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Joe Buck
10:00 Re: -mmmx and -msse are broken [unreviewed patch attached - 3.0 regression] Kelley Cook
09:15 Re: alpha -> ppc cross compiler Geoff Keating
07:35 Re: C++ standard Library Alexandre Oliva
07:13 Re: C++ standard Library Gabriel Dos Reis
07:06 GCJ complier Hamdy Mobarak
07:01 Re: criteria.html open issues Jamie Lokier
06:59 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Paolo Carlini
06:53 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Will Menninger
06:41 C++ standard Library Thomas Leuxner
06:29 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Tim Prince
06:11 Re: v3 template errors Martin Reinecke
03:47 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed Michael Matz
01:19 Re: criteria.html open issues Geoff Keating
01:18 virtual-incoming-args meaning Henri-Pierre CHARLES
00:37 Re: Copyright Assignment Forms Nick Clifton
00:22 Re: criteria.html open issues Zack Weinberg
00:14 Copyright Assignment Forms Sam TH

May 28, 2001
23:22 Re: ARM Cross-compiler problem Philip Blundell
21:33 Re: criteria.html open issues Daniel Berlin
20:12 v3 template errors Alonzo Fretwell
20:08 Re: criteria.html open issues Albert D. Cahalan
19:14 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Christopher Faylor
18:35 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Alexandre Oliva
18:02 Re: ARM Cross-compiler problem Alexandre Oliva
18:00 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? dewar
17:06 gcc-ss-20010528 is now available law
16:59 ARM Cross-compiler problem root
15:53 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Christopher Faylor
15:28 Re: [GCC] [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Trevor Jenkins
15:26 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Jean-Pierre Radley
15:25 -fxref John Carter
15:16 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Christopher Faylor
15:12 Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? dewar
15:04 [ADMINISTRIVIA] Block html mail here? Christopher Faylor
14:25 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Paolo Carlini
13:19 , - sanyol
12:12 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC dewar
12:01 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Diego Novillo
11:51 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Toon Moene
11:48 Re: SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC dewar
11:33 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Daniel Berlin
11:23 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
11:18 SPECFP95 comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 on SPARC Dan Nicolaescu
11:07 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Paolo Carlini
10:51 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Daniel Berlin
09:06 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Paolo Carlini
08:48 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Daniel Berlin
08:28 Re: criteria.html open issues Zack Weinberg
06:34 Re: Why strcpy and not strtod? Paolo Carlini
05:58 Re: criteria.html open issues Joseph S. Myers
05:43 Re: criteria.html open issues Tim Hollebeek
05:32 Re: criteria.html open issues Joseph S. Myers
05:29 Re: ACATS (Ada Conformity Assessment Test Suite) legalese dewar
05:27 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
05:24 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
05:20 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
04:57 ߧY@Ot Daphne
04:08 Re: bug 2914 & scope Gabriel Dos Reis
03:50 Why strcpy and not strtod [2]? Maurizio Loreti
03:34 Re: PATCH for Re: bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Gerald Pfeifer
03:32 Why strcpy and not strtod? Maurizio Loreti
02:25 Re: PATCH for Re: bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Erik Mouw
01:29 CAPITAL INVESTMENT James Frank
01:02 Re: criteria.html open issues Zack Weinberg
00:50 PATCH for Re: bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Gerald Pfeifer
00:41 Re: mirroring ? jason andrade
00:39 Re: ACATS (Ada Conformity Assessment Test Suite) legalese Gerald Pfeifer
00:37 Re: mirroring ? Gerald Pfeifer
00:29 Re: stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Schwab

May 27, 2001
23:47 Re: criteria.html open issues Albert D. Cahalan
22:37 Re: criteria.html open issues Zack Weinberg
21:41 Re: criteria.html open issues Albert D. Cahalan
20:47 Re: criteria.html open issues dewar
20:35 criteria.html open issues Albert D. Cahalan
20:29 RE: Benchmarking theory dewar
20:21 RE: Benchmarking theory dewar
20:13 RE: Benchmarking theory M. Edward Borasky
19:46 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Joe Buck
19:38 Re: stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joe Buck
19:24 Re: define_insn_and_split David Edelsohn
18:55 Re: gcc-3.0 pre and mem_fun() Craig Rodrigues
17:00 define_insn_and_split Marco
15:04 Re: Manual indexes Philip Blundell
13:35 Manual indexes Joseph S. Myers
13:20 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Scott A Crosby
11:52 random thought re GC allocator Zack Weinberg
11:24 Re: pic code generation Fergus Henderson
08:23 pic code generation Fergus Henderson
08:16 bug 2914 & scope Nathan Sidwell
07:40 Re: Benchmarking theory Joseph S. Myers
07:24 Re: Benchmarking theory Toon Moene
05:24 Re: bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Erik Mouw
03:35 Re: bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Gerald Pfeifer

May 26, 2001
20:34 RE: SPEC95 performance comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 M. Edward Borasky
20:11 Re: Benchmarking theory dewar
20:05 Re: Benchmarking theory David Konerding
19:45 Re: stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Carlo Wood
19:17 Re: stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Henderson
16:05 Re: Benchmarking theory Toon Moene
15:35 Benchmarking theory Joseph S. Myers
15:24 SPEC95 performance comparison: 2.95.3 vs 3.0-20010525 Dan Nicolaescu
14:10 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Richard Henderson
13:34 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Jakub Jelinek
09:18 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
07:29 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Toon Moene
06:29 Re: some problem of virtual function. dewar
06:26 Re: some problem of virtual function. Carlo Wood
06:14 Re: libstdc++ change breaks simple code Carlo Wood
04:53 Re: how to change register allocation order Alexandre Oliva
03:18 Re: how to change register allocation order zhang tao
01:12 Re: warning: unknown escape sequence Alexandre Oliva
01:09 Re: how to change register allocation order Alexandre Oliva
01:07 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
00:11 V3 PATCH: #undef abs (was Re: libstdc++ change breaks simple code) Gabriel Dos Reis

May 25, 2001
23:50 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Gabriel Dos Reis
23:06 Re: some problem of virtual function. jacky
22:18 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction dewar
22:02 warning: unknown escape sequence Soubhik Bhattacharya
20:43 libstdc++ change breaks simple code Mixtim
20:30 Re: gcc-ss-20010521 build dies on SCO Openserver 5.0.4 Robert Lipe
19:43 Re: Abnormally large executable with gcc 3.0 Carlo Wood
19:36 Re: some problem of virtual function. Carlo Wood
19:13 Abnormally large executable with gcc 3.0 R L
18:38 some problem of virtual function. jacky
18:29 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues David Edelsohn
18:24 stepanov on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joe Buck
18:17 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Joe Buck
18:09 Re: Bootstrap failure for AIX on 3.0 branch David Edelsohn
18:08 Re: stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Richard Henderson
17:56 stepanov on sparc; sparc backend scheduling issues Joe Buck
16:21 Bootstrap failure for AIX on 3.0 branch Matthew Conway
16:17 Re: configuring for THUMB Michael Eager
15:24 Re: gzip performance test David Edelsohn
15:16 Re: gzip performance test Joe Buck
14:27 gcc-ss-20010521 build dies on SCO Openserver 5.0.4 David Gressett
14:10 Re: gzip performance test Jean Francois Martinez
13:56 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX David Edelsohn
13:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Prereleases Joseph S. Myers
13:35 Re: Switch question Gabriel Dos Reis
13:34 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX Geoff Keating
13:29 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Toon Moene
13:26 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Diego Novillo
13:20 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX David Edelsohn
13:11 Re: gzip performance test Mark Mitchell
13:09 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX Geoff Keating
13:07 Re: gzip performance test Jean Francois Martinez
13:06 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Toon Moene
13:01 Re: tweaks for autoconf 2.50 Zack Weinberg
12:49 Re: gzip performance test Joe Buck
12:47 Re: GCC 3.0 Prereleases Mark Mitchell
12:38 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Jonathan Buzzard
12:37 Re: gzip performance test Jean Francois Martinez
12:37 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Jonathan Buzzard
12:35 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX David Edelsohn
12:30 PR 2875, regression with -fPIC? Craig Rodrigues
12:29 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Joe Buck
12:21 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX Richard Henderson
12:07 Re: tweaks for autoconf 2.50 Geoff Keating
12:06 unwind-dw2-fde.c change breaks AIX David Edelsohn
12:04 Re: gzip performance test Laurent Guerby
11:58 Re: CVS mainline cp/spew.c failing to build Gordon Sadler
11:53 Re: CVS mainline gcov failing to build Gordon Sadler
11:39 Re: PR2912 Richard Henderson
11:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Prereleases Joseph S. Myers
11:12 CVS mainline cp/spew.c failing to build Gordon Sadler
11:10 Re: core file not created Erik Mouw
11:08 Re: PR2912 Mark Mitchell
11:04 Re: gcc 2.96 reports in GNATS Richard Henderson
10:56 Re: core file not created Zack Weinberg
10:46 Re: PR2912 Richard Henderson
10:40 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Toshi Morita
10:32 core file not created Katherine Meiszer
10:25 CVS mainline gcov failing to build Gordon Sadler
10:11 Re: Multiple jumps in one instruction Joseph S. Myers
10:01 GCC 3.0 Prereleases Mark Mitchell
09:52 Re: Switch question Benjamin Kosnik
09:16 Multiple jumps in one instruction Jonathan Buzzard
08:50 how to change register allocation order zhang tao
08:49 Re: gzip performance test dewar
08:37 Re: 3.0 -finline-limit and c++ Mark Mitchell
08:27 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
08:19 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
08:17 Re: gzip performance test Joe Buck
08:13 Re: gzip performance test Joe Buck
07:59 Re: gzip performance test David Edelsohn
07:44 Re: gzip performance test David Edelsohn
06:49 Re: gzip performance test dewar
06:24 Re: Should PR2183 be closed? Carlo Wood
04:23 3.0 -finline-limit and c++ Teemu Torma
04:13 3.0 bootstrapping error on ultrasparc Teemu Torma
04:01 Re: Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
03:46 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
03:17 Re: Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
02:17 Re: -mmmx and -msse are broken Joseph S. Myers
02:04 GCC-2.95.3 optimisation: constant copied to registers Etienne Lorrain
01:42 -mmmx and -msse are broken Craig Rodrigues
00:49 gcc 2.96 reports in GNATS Craig Rodrigues
00:37 "Fast-Regs" GCC extensions proposal: part #1 [missing attachments!] Benedetto Proietti
00:06 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young

May 24, 2001
23:07 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Jeff Sturm
22:57 Re: gzip performance test Jean Francois Martinez
21:46 Should PR2183 be closed? Craig Rodrigues
21:23 PR2912 Mark Mitchell
20:52 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
19:06 Re: gzip performance test David Edelsohn
18:42 Eliminating POTFILES, etc - can we lose catgets support? Zack Weinberg
18:42 gzip performance test Joe Buck
17:20 register variables zhang tao
17:00 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 John David Anglin
16:34 Re: libjava build failure on branch for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Joe Buck
16:13 Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx() DJ Delorie
16:09 Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx() Richard Henderson
15:55 Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx() DJ Delorie
15:25 Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx() Richard Henderson
15:16 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Richard Henderson
14:34 Versioning V3 headers Gabriel Dos Reis
14:13 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Richard Henderson
14:08 "Fast-Regs" GCC extensions proposal: part #1 Benedetto Proietti
13:50 Re: big endian on Intel Toshi Morita
13:34 atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx() DJ Delorie
13:29 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Geoff Keating
13:21 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Daniel Berlin
12:54 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Andreas Jaeger
12:47 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Mark Mitchell
12:38 Re: Troubling bootstrap information Geoff Keating
12:36 Re: Building libstdc++-2.90.7 using gcc-2.95.3 on Redhat Linux 7.1 Phil Edwards
12:28 Re: c++ using 2.95.2 and -ansi switch Neil Booth
12:25 Re: c++ using 2.95.2 and -ansi switch Andreas Schwab
12:22 big endian on Intel Davis, Warren H.
12:21 Troubling bootstrap information Mark Mitchell
11:46 c++ using 2.95.2 and -ansi switch Kuraisa, Roy
11:11 Free Palm Pilot Creative24seven
10:53 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
10:48 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed Neil Booth
10:15 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Jean Francois Martinez
10:03 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 John David Anglin
09:01 Re: register variables Fergus Henderson
08:59 Re: P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Paolo Carlini
08:51 P4 support question (-> FAQ?) Will Menninger
08:32 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed Fergus Henderson
08:15 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed dewar
08:09 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed Nathan Sidwell
08:04 Re: Switch question Gabriel Dos Reis
07:35 register variables zhang tao
07:07 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed dewar
06:27 Close PR/1068 Nicola Pero
06:15 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/orabort commit) Loren James Rittle
06:10 Link error (__gxx_personality_v0) during libstdc++-v3/configure Paolo Carlini
04:59 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Toon Moene
04:45 URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ilikecum
02:15 Re: Switch question Ryszard Kabatek
01:52 Re: Switch question Gabriel Dos Reis
01:27 Re: Comments with -fpreprocessed Nathan Sidwell
00:48 make install error with current gcc-3_0-branch Frdric L. W. Meunier

May 23, 2001
23:50 Re: shared libstdc++ and static libgcc Alexandre Oliva
23:04 Re: Which automake for libjava? Zack Weinberg
22:51 shared libstdc++ and static libgcc Frdric L. W. Meunier
22:41 Re: Which automake for libjava? Bryce McKinlay
22:38 RE: Which automake for libjava? Anthony Green
22:35 Re: Which automake for libjava? Tom Tromey
21:23 Which automake for libjava? Zack Weinberg
20:31 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 John David Anglin
20:28 Re: undefined reference to `std::strchr(char const*, int)' Carlo Wood
20:03 Re: undefined reference to `std::strchr(char const*, int)' Benjamin Kosnik
19:37 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
19:07 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
19:03 undefined reference to `std::strchr(char const*, int)' Carlo Wood
18:49 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: Moreinfo on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Jeff Sturm
18:26 3.0 regression: gcov does not work Brad Lucier
18:06 Re: some help Carlo Wood
17:04 symbol table question Andrew Begel
16:55 some help Punn, Kamal
16:36 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
16:09 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
16:07 Re: Mahh braainn huhts! (libstdc++-v3 vs Darwin) Stan Shebs
16:02 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Alexandre Oliva
15:57 Java exceptions on IA64 Boehm, Hans
15:56 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Loren James Rittle
15:35 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
15:30 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
15:28 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
15:26 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
15:16 Re: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? - WAY OFF TOPIC John Carter
15:15 GNU Pascal integration status (was Re: Adding files for Ada) Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:15 Re: compatibility Clarification Alexandre Oliva
15:13 Re: Bug found in STL? Loren James Rittle
14:39 Re: Switch question Benjamin Kosnik
14:37 3.0 (20010523) branch fails on HP-UX 11.00 YU,SAMMY (HP-Roseville,ex1)
14:04 Text with unspecified "next release" in install.texi Toon Moene
14:03 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Toon Moene
14:02 Re: Builtins in `std' Fergus Henderson
13:45 Re: Adding files for Ada Laurent Guerby
13:43 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Russ Allbery
13:24 Re: Adding files for Ada Laurent Guerby
13:18 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
13:04 Re: Adding files for Ada Geert Bosch
12:49 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
12:36 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
12:11 Re: Builtins in `std' benjamin kosnik
12:08 Re: Adding files for Ada Laurent Guerby
12:07 Re: Building libstdc++-2.90.7 using gcc-2.95.3 on Redhat Linux 7.1 Roscoe A Bartlett
12:06 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
11:59 ACATS (Ada Conformity Assessment Test Suite) legalese Laurent Guerby
11:56 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
11:56 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
11:53 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
11:46 Re: Adding files for Ada Laurent Guerby
11:46 gcc build on alphaev5-dec-osf4.0g Richard Jackson
11:35 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
11:27 Re: Builtins in `std' Phil Edwards
11:22 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
11:05 Re: Builtins in `std' Fergus Henderson
10:56 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
10:54 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
10:48 Re: Builtins in `std' Fergus Henderson
10:48 Re: An unexpected warning (trigraph) Neil Booth
10:47 Comments with -fpreprocessed Neil Booth
10:45 Re: Builtins in `std' Jason Merrill
10:22 bad link (on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#mips*-sgi-irix6) Darek Kedra
10:13 Re: Builtins in `std' Jakub Jelinek
09:55 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
09:37 Re: Building libstdc++-2.90.7 using gcc-2.95.3 on Redhat Linux 7.1 Phil Edwards
09:22 Re: Builtins in `std' Jakub Jelinek
08:54 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Mark Mitchell
08:45 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
08:45 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Carlo Wood
08:37 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
08:35 Re: configuring for THUMB Marco
08:26 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Carlo Wood
08:24 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Richard Earnshaw
08:10 Re: libjava/testsuite/Makefile.in Tom Tromey
07:15 Re: Adding files for Ada dewar
06:56 Re: documentation of trees vs RTL Gerald Pfeifer
06:50 Re: An unexpected warning (trigraph) Robert Lipe
06:37 Re: Adding files for Ada Florian Weimer
06:35 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Gerald Pfeifer
06:23 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Brad Lucier
06:21 Re: PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Carlo Wood
05:57 Re: Unwanted error for long charconsts? Fergus Henderson
05:17 PATCH for Re: contrib/gcc_update Gerald Pfeifer
05:07 Re: documentation of trees vs RTL Joseph S. Myers
05:06 OFFSET_IMM8 relocation error Patrick
04:53 bug in cygwin-gcc 2.95.3-1 (compiled with -mno-cygwin)? Michael Scheibler
04:46 Re: documentation of trees vs RTL Theodore Papadopoulo
04:28 Re: Need to doenload C compiler Gerald Pfeifer
04:12 Re: Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
03:50 Switch question Ryszard Kabatek
03:32 Re: naming problem: ix86-pc-linux-gnulibc1 / ix86-pc-linux-gnulibc2 / ix86-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
03:29 Re: Builtins in `std' Jason Merrill
03:24 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
03:12 Re: Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
03:11 An unexpected warning (trigraph) Ryszard Kabatek
03:10 lt-gctest hangs on some Linux/x86 systems Christian Iseli
03:03 naming problem: ix86-pc-linux-gnulibc1 / ix86-pc-linux-gnulibc2 / ix86-pc-linux-gnu Christian Lademann
02:55 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
02:34 Re: Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
02:23 MAKE MONEY NOW daniel
02:04 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
01:41 Need to doenload C compiler Lokendra Kumar
01:37 Re: Builtins in `std' Nathan Sidwell
01:28 Build -gcc-2.95 kalaiarasi asokan
00:53 Re: Builtins in `std' Jakub Jelinek
00:45 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39 Re: Unwanted error for long charconsts? Joseph S. Myers
00:36 Re: Builtins in `std' Joseph S. Myers
00:36 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Re: Adding files for Ada Joseph S. Myers
00:27 Re: Builtins in `std' Andreas Jaeger
00:19 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
00:19 Re: documentation of trees vs RTL Joseph S. Myers
00:08 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis

May 22, 2001
23:55 Re: libjava build failure on branch for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mark Mitchell
23:49 Re: Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
23:43 Unwanted error for long charconsts? Neil Booth
23:34 Re: Builtins in `std' Gabriel Dos Reis
23:32 Re: Adding files for Ada law
23:23 Re: Adding files for Ada Neil Booth
23:18 Documentation Help Request (was: GCC 3.0 Status Report) Gerald Pfeifer
23:08 HEADS UP: wwwdocs/htdocs/install removed Gerald Pfeifer
23:01 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Mark Mitchell
22:54 Re: Alpha GNU/Linux Richard Henderson
22:46 Re: Adding files for Ada law
22:43 Alpha GNU/Linux Mark Mitchell
22:33 Re: libjava build failure on branch for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Phil Edwards
21:20 Re: libjava build failure on branch for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Jeff Sturm
20:11 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 David Edelsohn
20:03 Builtins in `std' Mark Mitchell
20:02 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Carlo Wood
19:11 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Gordon Sadler
19:11 Re: documentation of trees vs RTL Diego Novillo
19:06 Adding files for Ada Richard Kenner
18:55 documentation of trees vs RTL Fergus Henderson
18:24 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
18:18 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Carlo Wood
18:12 libjava/testsuite/Makefile.in Gordon Sadler
18:09 Re: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## Tim Prince
18:05 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
17:56 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Gordon Sadler
17:17 Re: Bug found in STL? Benjamin Kosnik
16:38 Re: Mahh braainn huhts! (libstdc++-v3 vs Darwin) Loren James Rittle
16:30 Bug found in STL? Eric Lemings
15:27 libjava build failure on branch for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Joe Buck
15:07 Mahh braainn huhts! (libstdc++-v3 vs Darwin) Stan Shebs
15:07 Re: 3.0 bootstrap failure - gengenrtl dumps core Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: compatibility Clarification Gabriel Dos Reis
15:00 V3 vs. AIX Mark Mitchell
14:51 Re: 3.0 bootstrap failure - gengenrtl dumps core Neil Booth
14:37 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
14:28 Re: compatibility Clarification Rainer Orth
14:22 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Toon Moene
14:20 Re: 3.0 bootstrap failure - gengenrtl dumps core Marcus G. Daniels
14:20 Re: compatibility Clarification Gabriel Dos Reis
14:04 C++ section 11.8 and gcc 2.95.2 versus 3.0 Magnus Fromreide
14:02 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
13:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Phil Edwards
13:46 Re: compatibility Clarification Mark Mitchell
13:39 Re: compatibility Clarification Stan Shebs
13:34 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
13:33 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
13:33 3.0 bootstrap failure - gengenrtl dumps core Christian Iseli
13:31 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Toon Moene
13:27 Re: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## David Edelsohn
13:24 Re: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## Christopher Faylor
13:14 RE: Problem with gcc 2.95.3 under HP-UX - missing asm directive Rupert Wood
13:12 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
13:08 Re: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## David Edelsohn
13:08 RE: ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## Davide Libenzi
13:06 Re: compatibility Clarification Rainer Orth
13:01 Re: configuring for THUMB Michael Eager
12:58 ######## Virus on your site?!?!!? ######## Erickson, Rob
12:53 Re: Suggested addition to documentation Brad Lucier
12:47 Re: compatibility Clarification Mark Mitchell
12:15 Re: Suggested addition to documentation David Edelsohn
12:03 Re: Suggested addition to documentation Joe Buck
12:00 Re: 2.7.2.3 and STL Joe Buck
12:00 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
11:59 Re: ia64 bootstrap failures Andreas Jaeger
11:21 Problem with gcc 2.95.3 under HP-UX - missing asm directive MARINIER,JEAN-PAUL (HP-France,
11:02 Re: ia64 bootstrap failures Janis Johnson
10:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Dennis Bjorklund
10:51 Re: URGENT mike stump
10:44 Re: Reporting bootstrap failures Neil Booth
10:14 Re: compilation failure Richard Henderson
10:13 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Benjamin Kosnik
10:09 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Matt Schalit
10:08 Benefit of "-fforce-mem"/"-fforce-addr" options? steve.snyder
10:07 Re: How to test libstdc++-v3 Theodore Papadopoulo
10:05 Well...Here it is!!!!! moneymakingoppor
09:56 ia64 bootstrap failures Bernd Schmidt
09:35 How to test libstdc++-v3 Christian Iseli
07:58 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
07:19 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
07:18 First bug found :-) M. Edward Borasky
07:15 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
07:13 Re: What do the .gnu.linkonce.* sections contain ? Nick Clifton
07:10 Re: memory to memory optimization Frank Ch. Eigler
07:00 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Nick Clifton
06:59 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
06:30 Re: Alpha 3.0 build failure Andrew Haley
06:18 Re: Alpha 3.0 build failure Graham Stott
05:34 Alpha 3.0 build failure Andrew Haley
05:20 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
05:01 Re: Fw: migrating libraries Alexandre Oliva
04:59 Re: compatibility Clarification Rainer Orth
04:58 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
04:36 Fw: migrating libraries puppala
04:20 What do the .gnu.linkonce.* sections contain ? Beier, Niels
03:55 Re: Reporting bootstrap failures Gerald Pfeifer
03:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Gerald Pfeifer
03:50 Re: compatibility Clarification Alexandre Oliva
03:49 Re: gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
03:49 Re: installation error Alexandre Oliva
03:39 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch Alexandre Oliva
03:37 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joseph S. Myers
03:23 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
02:41 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Fergus Henderson
02:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joseph S. Myers
01:44 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Dennis Bjorklund
00:59 Re: 2.7.2.3 and STL Steinar Bang
00:24 Re: Several new ix86 regressions in mainline? Loren James Rittle

May 21, 2001
23:26 Re: I'm missing something obvious... Neil Booth
23:21 Re: BUSINESS CONTACT Neil Booth
23:15 Re: I'm missing something obvious... Zack Weinberg
23:04 BUSINESS CONTACT internationalcom
22:53 compatibility Clarification Madhu Srinivasan
22:34 URGENT Rajrup Banerjee
21:23 gcc/f/malloc.h and HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
20:54 Suggested addition to documentation Brad Lucier
20:23 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Daniel Berlin
20:00 installation error Marco
19:23 Re: Global static variables Michael Eager
19:20 Re: compilation failure Jean-Pierre Radley
19:08 I'm missing something obvious... Zack Weinberg
18:48 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: Moreinfo on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Jeff Sturm
18:08 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Stan Shebs
18:00 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David Edelsohn
17:58 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: More info on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Richard Henderson
17:55 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: Moreinfo on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Jeff Sturm
17:26 gcc-ss-20010521 is now available law
17:23 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
17:22 Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c Mark Mitchell
17:15 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: More info on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Richard Henderson
16:53 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Marc Espie
16:42 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: Moreinfo on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Jeff Sturm
16:36 Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: More info on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Richard Henderson
16:21 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Stan Shebs
16:04 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch David Edelsohn
15:57 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch Albert Chin-A-Young
15:53 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David Edelsohn
15:31 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch David Edelsohn
14:58 bug 2871 Marc Desmarais
14:42 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
14:26 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Joe Buck
14:21 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch David Edelsohn
14:19 Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c Mark Mitchell
14:16 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Mark Mitchell
14:15 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
14:10 Re: GCC 3.0 Fortran Status - PR 2782 Toon Moene
14:08 Re: 2.7.2.3 and STL Gerald Pfeifer
13:15 Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c Richard Henderson
13:11 HP-UX 10.20, exceptions, shared libs Thomas Matelich
13:10 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Joe Buck
12:49 Re: AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch David Edelsohn
12:30 AIX libstdc++-v3 breakage on gcc-3.0 branch David Edelsohn
12:25 Re: GCC 3.0 Fortran Status - PR 2782 Mark Mitchell
12:21 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Mark Mitchell
12:15 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Joe Buck
12:14 Re: Building Gcc for Darwin OS on PowerPC computers Stan Shebs
12:08 GCC 3.0 Fortran Status - PR 2782 Toon Moene
12:01 Re: random number? Toon Moene
11:51 CRC32 Manjunath AG
11:29 random number? Fredrik Lundgren
10:55 Re: 2.7.2.3 and STL Joe Buck
10:49 Re: libstdc++ question Benjamin Kosnik
10:45 current_funcdef_number vs. except.c Mark Mitchell
10:09 Re: Compiling 3.0 branch on HP-UX 10.20 Harri Pasanen
09:57 RE: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Boehm, Hans
09:04 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 H . J . Lu
09:03 Re: dlopen() under AIX with gcc/g++ David Edelsohn
08:54 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 H . J . Lu
08:48 Re: dlopen() under AIX with gcc/g++ Robert Boehne
07:56 Re: Athlon testing progress mike stump
06:56 c++/java relocation errors on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (Re: More info on Java coredump on sparc Solaris) Jeff Sturm
06:41 Re: 2.7.2.3 and STL Gerald Pfeifer
04:10 Building Gcc for Darwin OS on PowerPC computers Philippe TEISSIER
03:51 2.7.2.3 and STL MALETA,MAREK (A-Germany,ex1)
02:50 Re: Several new ix86 regressions in mainline? Jan Hubicka

May 20, 2001
23:50 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
22:59 Compiling 3.0 branch on HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
21:31 Re: Several new ix86 regressions in mainline? Diego Novillo
21:22 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Mark Mitchell
21:21 Re: Several new ix86 regressions in mainline? David Edelsohn
21:09 Several new ix86 regressions in mainline? Diego Novillo
20:40 Re: dlopen() under AIX with gcc/g++ David Edelsohn
19:01 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Fergus Henderson
18:46 Re: Hexadecimal floats Fergus Henderson
17:16 Re: dlopen() under AIX with gcc/g++ Robert Boehne
16:44 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 H . J . Lu
14:49 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
14:35 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
14:12 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Richard Henderson
14:05 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Robert Lipe
14:00 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Richard Henderson
14:00 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David Edelsohn
13:46 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Robert Lipe
13:17 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Richard Henderson
13:15 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Mark Mitchell
13:13 Re: Hexadecimal floats Neil Booth
13:12 Re: 3.1: Bootstrap comparison failures on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu Brad Lucier
13:10 Re: compilation failure Mark Mitchell
13:04 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Neil Booth
13:00 Re: compilation failure Richard Henderson
12:52 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
12:42 Re: compilation failure Mark Mitchell
12:09 Hexadecimal floats Joseph S. Myers
12:01 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Ulrich Drepper
11:59 Re: compilation failure Richard Henderson
11:34 Re: compilation failure Mark Mitchell
11:32 Re: Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Mark Mitchell
11:30 Re: libobjc build problem Alexandre Oliva
11:28 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
11:21 Re: Libjava craziness Alexandre Oliva
11:13 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Falk Hueffner
11:12 compilation failure Jean-Pierre Radley
11:10 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
11:10 Re: libobjc build problem Richard Kenner
11:08 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Mark Mitchell
11:04 configuring for THUMB Marco
11:03 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
11:01 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Mark Mitchell
10:57 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Mark Mitchell
10:53 Re: libobjc build problem Alexandre Oliva
10:52 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Neil Booth
10:52 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
10:51 Re: libobjc build problem Richard Kenner
10:49 Re: PR 2765 Joseph S. Myers
10:48 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Mark Mitchell
10:44 Re: libobjc build problem Alexandre Oliva
10:38 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Neil Booth
10:25 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Mark Mitchell
10:23 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Mark Mitchell
10:17 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/orabort commit) Mark Mitchell
10:09 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Mark Mitchell
10:08 Re: PR 2765 Mark Mitchell
09:45 Status of PINE compilation on Solaris bug? Joseph S. Myers
09:26 Re: libobjc build problem Richard Kenner
09:16 Re: libobjc build problem Alexandre Oliva
09:07 Athlon testing progress M. Edward Borasky
09:06 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
08:41 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
08:40 libobjc build problem Richard Kenner
08:32 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
08:14 Re: Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Philip Blundell
07:44 Wrong dynamic-linker used on Solaris 7/x86 Alexandre Oliva
07:40 configure option for THUMB? Marco
06:51 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Nathan Sidwell
05:53 Re: More on autogen 5 build failure Fergus Henderson
04:59 Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Joseph S. Myers
04:33 Re: configure option for THUMB? Philip Blundell
04:16 configure option for THUMB? Marco
03:52 Re: More on autogen 5 build failure Richard Kenner
02:31 Re: need help debugging Michael Ritzert
01:23 [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken Neil Booth
01:18 Re: More on autogen 5 build failure Andreas Jaeger
00:17 Re: Slowness when configuring libstdc++-v3 Richard Henderson

May 19, 2001
23:45 mirroring ? jason andrade
23:02 libstdc++ question Tom Tromey
21:02 Re: Slowness when configuring libstdc++-v3 Alexandre Oliva
20:01 Problem building libstdc++-v3 on Alpha Richard Kenner
19:40 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Jeff Sturm
18:55 Slowness when configuring libstdc++-v3 Richard Kenner
18:46 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Alexandre Oliva
17:43 Re: Bugs review status? Joseph S. Myers
17:38 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Falk Hueffner
17:31 Re: PR 2765 Joseph S. Myers
17:06 Re: PR 2765 Mark Mitchell
16:56 Re: PR 2765 Joseph S. Myers
16:52 Re: How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Bruce Korb
16:49 Re: Bugs review status? Mark Mitchell
16:45 Re: branch for PCH GC work Mark Mitchell
16:42 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Mark Mitchell
16:26 Re: PR 2765 Mark Mitchell
16:06 Re: How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Alexandre Oliva
15:35 Bugs review status? Joseph S. Myers
15:20 Re: PR 2765 Joseph S. Myers
14:52 Re: branch for PCH GC work Neil Booth
14:05 branch for PCH GC work Geoff Keating
13:44 Re: More Athlon Questions Jean Francois Martinez
13:43 Re: Is this code really unused? Sam TH
13:03 Yet another autogen 5 build error Richard Kenner
13:00 Next autogen 5 build failure Richard Kenner
12:57 More on autogen 5 build failure Richard Kenner
12:51 Build problems, cont.d Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: More Athlon Questions Andreas Jaeger
11:37 Re: More Athlon Questions mike stump
11:29 Problem building latest tree on alpha Richard Kenner
11:18 More Athlon Questions M. Edward Borasky
10:11 Re: need help debugging Carlo Wood
07:44 Re: RFA: Examine PR2758 Falk Hueffner
07:38 need help debugging Michael Ritzert
03:50 Reporting bootstrap failures Laurynas Biveinis
01:40 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Franz Sirl

May 18, 2001
23:49 Re: How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Zack Weinberg
22:33 Re: Volunteering for GCC 3.0 testing Craig Rodrigues
22:21 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Fergus Henderson
18:22 Re: How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Bruce Korb
18:21 Volunteering for GCC 3.0 testing M. Edward Borasky
17:57 PR 2765 Mark Mitchell
17:35 RFA: Examine PR2758 Mark Mitchell
17:14 Re: How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Zack Weinberg
15:45 memory to memory optimization reedkotler
15:32 How hard would it be to BORG the fixproto stuff? Bruce Korb
14:50 Re: is subreg with subreg_byte outside source valid? David Edelsohn
14:44 Re: is subreg with subreg_byte outside source valid? Jan Hubicka
14:40 Re: is subreg with subreg_byte outside source valid? David Edelsohn
14:33 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Franz Sirl
14:31 Re: GCC mike stump
14:30 Re: Global static variables mike stump
14:17 Re: is subreg with subreg_byte outside source valid? Jan Hubicka
14:09 is subreg with subreg_byte outside source valid? Jan Hubicka
13:50 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David O'Brien
13:40 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Michael Meissner
13:33 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David Edelsohn
13:28 Re: Q) compile option( -fpack-struct ) not applied mike stump
13:24 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Loren James Rittle
13:24 Re: HELP ME PLEASE!!!!!!! Alexandre Oliva
13:06 Re: String.h Alexandre Oliva
12:58 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Joseph S. Myers
12:14 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Loren James Rittle
12:05 Re: String.h Alex Arulanthu
11:50 Re: String.h Mike Stump
11:49 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Loren James Rittle
11:46 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Loren James Rittle
11:43 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Loren James Rittle
11:40 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Loren James Rittle
11:29 HELP ME PLEASE!!!!!!! Oscar Gonzalez Garduo
11:28 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David O'Brien
11:20 Re: GCC Diego Novillo
11:17 Re: Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h Geoff Keating
11:06 Re: GCC Erik Mouw
11:00 [RFA]: Remove or disable gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c John David Anglin
10:44 Re: Building on HEAD broken Zack Weinberg
10:08 Is this code really unused? Sam TH
08:55 GCC H. Rane
08:30 Re: exceptions in a coroutine enviroment Leon Bottou
08:25 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? David Edelsohn
07:51 Global static variables Soeren Grimm
07:38 PR 2721 duplicate Dirk Mueller
07:26 Building on HEAD broken Andreas Schwab
06:48 Re: GCC 3.0 Status - Fortran. Toon Moene
06:16 Re: GCC 3.0 Status - Fortran. Tim Prince
04:46 Defining __powerpc__ in rs6000.h David O'Brien
04:40 Re: `MAKEOVERRIDES=' Golubev I. N.
02:56 Q) compile option( -fpack-struct ) not applied KYS2906
02:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Status - Fortran. Toon Moene
02:10 where about manual in window hlp format wah.jong
01:17 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Richard Henderson
00:14 Re: GCC 3.0 Status - Fortran. Tim Prince
00:12 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Robert Lipe

May 17, 2001
22:42 Re: Libjava craziness Alexandre Oliva
22:39 Re: Libjava craziness Alexandre Oliva
22:33 Re: Libjava craziness Mark Mitchell
22:26 Re: Libjava craziness Alexandre Oliva
22:22 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Fergus Henderson
22:06 Re: Libjava craziness Mark Mitchell
21:44 Re: Extra const int constraint letters? Richard Henderson
21:15 Finding out what calls who... John Carter
20:46 Re: How to make the address of varients are assigned immediately in the memory? Alexandre Oliva
20:41 Extra const int constraint letters? Stan Shebs
20:36 Libjava craziness Mark Mitchell
20:25 How to make the address of varients are assigned immediately in the memory? Elva Wang
20:24 Re: Libjava craziness Alexandre Oliva
20:23 Re: String.h Carlo Wood
20:18 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Loren James Rittle
20:18 Re: unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Richard Henderson
18:11 Re: String.h Alex Arulanthu
15:28 Re: problem with virtual functions Mike Stump
15:13 Re: problem with virtual functions Alexandre Oliva
15:08 Re: problem with virtual functions vok
14:26 Re: `MAKEOVERRIDES=' Alexandre Oliva
14:02 Re: `MAKEOVERRIDES=' John David Anglin
13:19 Info needed Pascal Perry
13:19 GCC and Solaris 8 Paul Dubuc
12:55 Re: problem with virtual functions Alexandre Oliva
12:28 problem using GCOV Bon Vipkone
12:27 GCC 3.0 Status - Fortran. Toon Moene
12:08 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Branko Čibej
11:49 Re: Building libstdc++-2.90.7 using gcc-2.95.3 on Redhat Linux 7.1 Alexandre Oliva
11:45 problem with virtual functions vok
11:33 Re: visual studio compatibility Francois Gouget
11:27 Re: standards for include guards? Sam TH
11:24 Re: Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Francois Gouget
11:18 Building libstdc++-2.90.7 using gcc-2.95.3 on Redhat Linux 7.1 Roscoe A Bartlett
10:21 fastjar binary renamed to jar Per Bothner
10:06 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? David Edelsohn
10:05 Remaining content of x-fragments Zack Weinberg
09:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joe Buck
09:26 Re: standards for include guards? Mark Mitchell
08:45 Re: standards for include guards? Fergus Henderson
07:44 gcc 3.0 branch bootstrap fails on hpux 11.00 Harri Pasanen
07:43 standards for include guards? Sam TH
07:07 unwind-dw2.c: 2 new branch build failures overnight. Robert Lipe
06:44 Re: How to make the address of varients are assigned immediately in the memory? Tim Prince
06:22 tcl error while checking libstdc++-v3 Christian Iseli
06:07 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Marc Espie
05:17 `MAKEOVERRIDES=' Golubev I. N.
04:30 porting GCC on a new OS Cdric Durmont
04:27 Re: GNATS documentation Gerald Pfeifer
03:32 porting GCC on a new OS C.DURMONT
03:25 How to make the address of varients are assigned immediately in the memory? Elva Wang
03:13 Re: Is it possible to generate unique goto labels with preprocessor? Andi Kleen
02:29 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Christian Iseli
01:55 gcc-ss-20010514 bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
01:39 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? Geoff Keating
00:25 Bad libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/i486/bits/atomicity.h [An ia32 LOCK/XADD bug.] H . J . Lu

May 16, 2001
22:03 Re: String.h Mike Stump
20:47 Re: SSA value numbering doing better than GCSE? David Edelsohn
20:14 String.h Alex Arulanthu
20:09 SSA value numbering doing better than GCSE? Daniel Berlin
20:06 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? David Edelsohn
19:37 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? Geoff Keating
19:25 Re: PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? David Edelsohn
17:44 Is it possible to generate unique goto labels with preprocessor? Salim Nasser
17:35 Re: gcc 2.95.2 David Edelsohn
17:32 Is it possible to generate unique goto labels with preprocessor? Anders Torger
16:22 Re: gcc 2.95.2 Joe Buck
16:06 PowerPC Floating Point compare bug? Becky Gill
15:28 gcc 2.95.2 Sally S Maznabi
15:12 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Branko Čibej
15:10 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Richard Henderson
15:00 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Jakub Jelinek
14:56 Mistaken commit Neil Booth
14:50 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Richard Henderson
14:47 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Jakub Jelinek
14:28 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Richard Henderson
14:27 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Richard Henderson
14:24 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Jakub Jelinek
14:21 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Jakub Jelinek
14:08 Re: __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Richard Henderson
13:31 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Marc Espie
13:31 __frame_state_for has dissappeared from libgcc Mark Kettenis
09:24 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Alexandre Oliva
08:58 Re: wstring implementation problem Phil Edwards
08:46 Re: wstring implementation problem Andrew Snare
08:19 Re: wstring implementation problem Phil Edwards
07:18 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Daniel Berlin
07:16 Re: libtool: link order problem affecting gij Jeff Sturm
06:38 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Gerald Pfeifer
06:16 Re: help me !! Tim Prince
05:34 [Q] Dynamic warnings control ? Didier Verna
05:17 gcc version 3.1 20010515 still segfaults on blitz nbecker
04:53 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Jason Merrill
03:49 Re: help me !! Alexandre Oliva
03:43 Re: copyright assignment forms Gerald Pfeifer
03:28 help me !! bhaskar baruah
03:27 wstring implementation problem Antti.Kuorelahti
02:58 Re: "xordi3" pattern in arm.md Philip Blundell
02:36 Re: "xordi3" pattern in arm.md Richard Earnshaw
02:14 gcc/doc/install.texi Gerald Pfeifer
02:06 Release of intel C/C++ compiler [ beta] for Linux biswapesh.chattopadhyay
01:38 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Alexandre Oliva
01:31 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abortcommit) Gerald Pfeifer
00:57 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Alexandre Oliva

May 15, 2001
23:19 Re: libtool: link order problem affecting gij Alexandre Oliva
23:19 just to say hi........ nr3
22:35 Re: libtool: link order problem affecting gij Bryce McKinlay
22:13 Re: autoconf and automake versions for gcc Tom Tromey
21:56 Re: Large Files in C++ Alexandre Oliva
21:54 Re: Request Alexandre Oliva
21:53 Re: help for ccppc Alexandre Oliva
21:19 Re: how to detect out of disk space Alexandre Oliva
21:06 how to detect out of disk space Sunit Bhatia
19:30 News From Troon Golf Troon Golf
18:14 Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 build FAILED Alexandre Oliva
16:19 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX Elena Zannoni
15:31 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX David Edelsohn
15:27 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX Elena Zannoni
14:40 ! tsaritsino
14:07 autoconf and automake versions for gcc Per Bothner
13:38 "xordi3" pattern in arm.md Philip Blundell
13:17 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Geoff Keating
12:45 copyright assignment forms Jan van Male
12:39 Severe problems runnning the g++ test suite on the 3.0 branch Peter Schmid
12:30 Re: gcc_update bug Andreas Schwab
12:28 Re: Mailing list mixup [was: Foo] Gerald Pfeifer
12:20 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Tom Tromey
12:18 hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 build FAILED Jim Kay
12:14 Re: Company is looking for GNU tool chain developers Joe Buck
11:52 Re: Undefined "_eprintf" Joe Buck
10:53 Re: gcc_update bug Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:35 Re: MACHINE_STATE_SAVE/RESTORE Richard Henderson
09:07 specs file question Loren James Rittle
08:47 Re: sparc64 Sean Callanan
08:03 Re: The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, registerrenaming, __builtin_return_address) Daniel Berlin
07:39 ! tsaritsino
07:23 Installing GCC on Solaris without existing compiler - reprise Mark Bradley
03:24 MACHINE_STATE_SAVE/RESTORE Bo Thorsen
03:21 Re: Identical? i386.md patterns for TARGET_64BIT and not Jan Hubicka
01:51 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Andrew Haley
00:08 Identical? i386.md patterns for TARGET_64BIT and not Zack Weinberg

May 14, 2001
23:39 Large Files in C++ Gaurav Gupta
23:33 [Fwd: Large Files handling in C++] Gaurav Gupta
23:17 Re: Anyone got a tree or RTL corruption bug? Zack Weinberg
22:50 Re: gcc_update bug Loren James Rittle
22:23 Re: branch bootstrap failure: exception_support.cc Richard Henderson
21:21 Re: branch bootstrap failure: exception_support.cc Robert Lipe
19:06 surprising? register allocator performance in gcc 2.95.3 Joshua Redstone
19:04 Re: The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address) Joseph S. Myers
18:48 Re: The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address) Craig Rodrigues
18:04 Re: The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address) Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address) James Dennett
17:49 Re: Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Mike Stump
17:48 Re: Linux ia64.h Mark Mitchell
17:45 Re: commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/orabort commit) Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: Linux ia64.h David O'Brien
17:29 Re: Linux ia64.h David Edelsohn
17:23 gcc-ss-20010514 is now available law
17:16 Re: branch bootstrap failure: exception_support.cc Richard Henderson
17:14 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Richard Henderson
17:12 Re: Anyone got a tree or RTL corruption bug? Mike Stump
16:49 Request Martin Popovici
16:44 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joseph S. Myers
16:19 Re: Why is GCC using DI register? Diego Novillo
16:13 Mailing list mixup [was: Foo] Malmberg
16:04 RE: Why is GCC using DI register? Dan Aalberg
15:56 Re: Linux ia64.h David O'Brien
15:56 Re: proper way to include gcc/config/<arch>/<arch>.h ? Richard Kenner
15:55 Re: proper way to include gcc/config/<arch>/<arch>.h ? David O'Brien
15:35 Re: Linux ia64.h Joe Buck
15:32 Re: Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Joe Buck
15:31 Re: proper way to include gcc/config/<arch>/<arch>.h ? Richard Kenner
15:26 Re: Linux ia64.h Richard Kenner
15:16 help for ccppc Michael G. Soulakis
15:11 proper way to include gcc/config/<arch>/<arch>.h ? David O'Brien
15:06 Re: Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Daniel Berlin
14:48 Re: Linux ia64.h David O'Brien
14:33 Re: Linux ia64.h Jim Wilson
14:28 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
14:05 Re: Why is GCC using DI register? dewar
13:54 commitinfo script to check policy, issue warnings (and/or abort commit) Loren James Rittle
13:20 Re: Why is GCC using DI register? Michael Meissner
13:01 Re: RFC -- More problems with disappearing labels law
12:36 Re: libtool Mark Klein
12:34 Why is GCC using DI register? Dan Aalberg
11:34 Re: Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Reed Kotler
11:30 Re: RFC -- More problems with disappearing labels Mark Mitchell
11:15 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Stan Shebs
10:54 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception inthread "main" Mark Mitchell
10:50 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception inthread "main" Andrew Haley
10:29 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Mark Mitchell
10:23 RE: [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu Peter Schmid
10:05 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Franz Sirl
09:59 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address David Edelsohn
09:57 My last message Jeffrey A Law
09:53 gccbug and *.ii files George Garvey
09:45 RFC -- More problems with disappearing labels Jeffrey A Law
09:45 Re: Anyone got a tree or RTL corruption bug? Janis Johnson
09:16 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Mark Mitchell
09:11 Re: __builtin_eh_return_data_regno Richard Henderson
09:08 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Mark Mitchell
08:16 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Gerald Pfeifer
07:37 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address David Edelsohn
05:44 Re: Can't download libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
05:13 The most unpopular suggestion ever (was Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address) Phil Edwards
02:53 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Franz Sirl
02:42 Re[2]: visual studio compatibility Pavel Kuznetsov
02:24 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Mark Mitchell
02:17 Re: SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Franz Sirl
02:00 __builtin_eh_return_data_regno Mark Mitchell
01:44 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Andrew Haley
01:43 Can't download libstdc++-v3 Jason Elbaum
00:47 ǧ򱶵ЧʣƳܷ focus_search
00:37 Re: gcc_update bug Mark Mitchell

May 13, 2001
23:59 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception inthread "main" Mark Mitchell
23:52 Re: gcc_update bug Fergus Henderson
21:30 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
21:30 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
21:06 Re: gcc_update bug Alexandre Oliva
20:38 Re: gcc_update bug Alexandre Oliva
20:27 Re: libtool Alexandre Oliva
20:07 Re: Anyone got a tree or RTL corruption bug? Daniel Berlin
19:46 Your website? jason ross
19:40 Anyone got a tree or RTL corruption bug? Zack Weinberg
19:36 libtool Mark Klein
18:48 RE: [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
18:19 gcc_update bug Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Alexandre Oliva
18:02 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
17:11 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Andrew Pimlott
16:50 SPARC, register renaming, __builtin_return_address Mark Mitchell
16:44 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
16:38 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Zack Weinberg
16:16 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Andrew Pimlott
16:14 Re: CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Tom Tromey
16:14 Re: RFA: check_dbra_loop Tom Tromey
16:10 Re: dwarf2 and clones (was Re: What to do, what to do) Daniel Berlin
15:46 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Alexandre Oliva
15:41 dwarf2 and clones (was Re: What to do, what to do) Jason Merrill
15:40 Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references Jason Merrill
15:26 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk David Edelsohn
14:48 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Andrew Pimlott
14:46 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
14:38 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Andrew Pimlott
14:26 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Geoff Keating
14:04 Re: Inquiry: When do we think GCC 3.0 might be completely ready? Erik Mouw
13:02 Re: [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu Toon Moene
12:57 branch bootstrap failure: exception_support.cc Robert Lipe
12:40 [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu Peter Schmid
11:38 Re: Undefined "_eprintf" H . J . Lu
11:22 Inquiry: When do we think GCC 3.0 might be completely ready? Joel Fressa
11:06 Re: RFA: check_dbra_loop Fergus Henderson
10:42 CVS gcc-3_0-branch libjava timing out, exception in thread "main" Gordon Sadler
10:28 Re: RFA: check_dbra_loop Mark Mitchell
10:25 Re: IMPORTANT: BRANCH FROZEN Mark Mitchell
09:11 We all want to be better parents.....don't we??? better_parenting
08:21 Re: Undefined "_eprintf" Fergus Henderson
08:00 Re: visual studio compatibility Fergus Henderson
07:47 Undefined "_eprintf" Richard Kenner
06:58 Trivia Neil Booth
06:19 Re: 3.0 branch bootstrap failure, eh changes likely Andreas Jaeger
06:17 Re: RFA: check_dbra_loop Richard Kenner
06:13 3.0 branch bootstrap failure, eh changes likely Gordon Sadler
03:24 Re: visual studio compatibility Phil Edwards
03:12 Re: visual studio compatibility Neil Booth
02:41 visual studio compatibility Pavel Kuznetsov
01:03 binutils 2.11.90.0.8 is released. H . J . Lu

May 12, 2001
19:42 gensimplify can now generate tree simplifications as well Daniel Berlin
18:40 Re: TOY Tim Josling
17:07 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Gordon Sadler
16:33 IMPORTANT: BRANCH FROZEN Mark Mitchell
16:20 Re: crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk David Edelsohn
14:29 Re: Company is looking for GNU tool chain developers Toon Moene
14:12 Re: fortran 77 compiler for pc window me Toon Moene
12:18 crashes building on Darwin using GCC trunk Marcus G. Daniels
11:40 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Mark Mitchell
11:37 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Mark Mitchell
11:29 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
11:22 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Alexandre Oliva
11:11 Re: EH merge Mark Mitchell
11:10 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
10:52 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
09:44 Re: libtool: link order problem affecting gij Jeff Sturm
09:31 fortran compiler for pc with window me Amerexpr518
09:08 fortran 77 compiler for pc window me Amerexpr518
06:25 libtool: link order problem affecting gij Bryce McKinlay
05:14 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Alexandre Oliva
04:39 Re: Installing GCC: Final installation Andreas Jaeger
04:05 Re: Installing GCC: Final installation Gerald Pfeifer
03:57 Re: CLIB Richard Kenner
03:11 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Richard Kenner
02:28 Re: Test Drive Gerald Pfeifer
02:27 Business Proposal. business
02:05 Linux ia64.h David O'Brien
00:03 Re: Installing GCC: Final installation Gerald Pfeifer

May 11, 2001
23:42 translation does not work Dennis Bjorklund
23:21 Re: sparc64 Jakub Jelinek
22:27 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Diego Novillo
21:56 Re: EH merge Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Fergus Henderson
20:38 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
20:14 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
20:00 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
19:57 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Fergus Henderson
19:44 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
19:24 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Fergus Henderson
19:22 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Alexandre Oliva
19:15 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Richard Kenner
19:04 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Richard Kenner
18:40 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
18:24 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Loren James Rittle
18:13 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
18:05 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
17:54 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Tom Tromey
17:52 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Geoff Keating
17:39 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
17:36 Re: sparc64 Alexandre Oliva
17:33 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Alexandre Oliva
17:30 Re: cmp and bcond patterns in md Alexandre Oliva
17:28 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Alexandre Oliva
17:06 Company is looking for GNU tool chain developers Pavel Baranov
17:05 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Joseph S. Myers
16:53 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
16:26 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
16:24 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Tom Tromey
16:01 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mike Stump
15:39 Re: EH merge Gerald Pfeifer
15:09 Re: GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Joe Buck
14:18 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:01 GCC vs. `make' on Solaris Mark Mitchell
13:51 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Gerald Pfeifer
13:45 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool Loren James Rittle
11:54 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" oflibtool Mark Mitchell
11:38 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Diego Novillo
11:31 Re: List of simplifications we should perform DJ Delorie
11:26 Re: Objective C features manual Ovidiu Predescu
11:26 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Diego Novillo
11:03 Re: List of simplifications we should perform DJ Delorie
11:02 Re: EH merge Mark Mitchell
10:55 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Diego Novillo
10:49 Re: List of simplifications we should perform DJ Delorie
10:43 Re: EH merge David Edelsohn
10:43 Re: EH merge Mark Mitchell
10:41 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Diego Novillo
10:37 Re: EH merge Mark Mitchell
10:31 Re: EH merge Zack Weinberg
10:26 Re: EH merge Benjamin Kosnik
10:25 i386 LIBGCC1 Golubev I. N.
10:15 Re: List of simplifications we should perform DJ Delorie
10:07 Re: EH merge Mark Mitchell
09:56 Re: EH merge Zack Weinberg
08:36 sparc64 Sean Callanan
08:26 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Mark Mitchell
08:21 EH merge Mark Mitchell
08:01 Re: gcc + Windows + general questions Jeff Sturm
07:37 Re: gcc + Windows + general questions Paolo Carlini
07:35 RE: gcc + Windows + general questions biswapesh.chattopadhyay
07:12 Re: gcc + Windows + general questions Soeren Grimm
06:39 RE: standard libraries biswapesh.chattopadhyay
06:23 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Theodore Papadopoulo
06:11 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
06:08 standard libraries Mark Aulick
06:06 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Toon Moene
05:52 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
05:27 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
05:13 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Richard Earnshaw
04:54 Re: error on web page Gerald Pfeifer
04:53 Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" oflibtool Gerald Pfeifer
04:42 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
03:01 cmp and bcond patterns in md Soubhik Bhattacharya
01:14 Re: List of simplifications we should perform Andi Kleen

May 10, 2001
23:17 List of simplifications we should perform Daniel Berlin
21:26 Re: GC development Fergus Henderson
19:35 Re: Feedback and Suggestions on GCC DJ Delorie
18:33 Re: Getting Development Version of gcc Jeff Sturm
18:21 Re: Is GCC installed? Alexandre Oliva
18:10 Re: downloadable manual (is there one?) Alexandre Oliva
18:10 Re: CPP pdf or ps manual Alexandre Oliva
18:08 gcc + Windows + general questions Soeren Grimm
18:00 Getting Development Version of gcc Skepsis
17:48 Re: Feedback and Suggestions on GCC Jeff Sturm
17:29 Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2] Stan Shebs
17:22 Re: Feedback and Suggestions on GCC Phil Edwards
17:07 Stray reference to reload_reg_class etc? Stan Shebs
16:59 Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2] Joseph S. Myers
16:56 Re: Feedback and Suggestions on GCC Jeff Sturm
16:42 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
16:37 Is GCC installed? Amanda
16:23 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
16:02 Re: C Parser Cleanup [Take 2] Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: C Parser Cleanup [Take 2] Mark Mitchell
15:08 Feedback and Suggestions on GCC Davis, Roy
14:19 Re: GC development Mark Mitchell
14:12 GC development Tom Tromey
13:35 Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2] Geoff Keating
12:30 Re: Objective C features manual Mark Mitchell
11:22 Re: GNATS documentation Joseph S. Myers
11:17 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
11:04 Re: Inheritance Problem Carlo Wood
10:49 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
10:45 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Tom Tromey
10:14 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
09:07 Re: GNATS documentation Gerald Pfeifer
08:18 Re: Inheritance Problem Brian Osman
07:57 Re: Inheritance Problem Joe Buck
07:57 Re: Inheritance Problem Joe Buck
06:47 Re: Inheritance Problem Carlo Wood
03:25 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Richard Kenner
02:13 Re: 20010325-1 vs wide strings Joseph S. Myers
02:09 Inheritance Problem Olaf Petzold

May 09, 2001
20:39 Bahamas Vacation Free Bahamas Voucher
19:38 20010325-1 vs wide strings DJ Delorie
18:25 reading command line arguments from a file Robert Schweikert
17:50 downloadable manual (is there one?) jormungandr
17:23 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
17:05 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
17:01 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
15:49 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
15:04 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Geoff Keating
14:58 Re: gcc 3.0 and Bison Version Mark Klein
14:53 Re: gcc on Mac OS X Stan Shebs
14:49 Re: cc: unrecognized option `-qnoro' David Edelsohn
14:44 Re: gcc on Mac OS X Gerald Pfeifer
14:40 Re: gcc on Mac OS X Stan Shebs
14:38 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Jeff Sturm
14:29 cc: unrecognized option `-qnoro' Carol Boyce
14:28 Re: gcc on Mac OS X Joe Buck
14:26 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Jakub Jelinek
14:21 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Geoff Keating
14:11 Re: gcc on Mac OS X Stan Shebs
14:06 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
14:06 Re: Bootstrap failure for AIX on main branch Matt_Conway
13:54 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
13:44 CPP pdf or ps manual Nelson Lau
12:58 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Andrew W. Reynolds
12:52 Re: Objective C features manual Stan Shebs
12:48 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
12:42 Re: gcc 3.0 and Bison Version Daniel Berlin
12:34 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Waldo Bastian
12:22 Re: Bootstrap failure for AIX on main branch David Edelsohn
12:16 Bootstrap failure for AIX on main branch Matthew Conway
12:15 Re: Automake and friends and fastjar Mark Klein
12:08 Re: Automake and friends and fastjar Tom Tromey
11:52 Re: Objective C features manual Joseph S. Myers
11:45 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
11:39 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
11:10 Re: peephole vs. scheduler David Edelsohn
11:09 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Richard Henderson
10:37 Re: peephole vs. scheduler Dale Johannesen
10:27 Re: gcc 3.0 and Bison Version Fergus Henderson
09:58 gcc 3.0 and Bison Version Mark Klein
09:58 Automake and friends and fastjar Mark Klein
09:30 Re: 3.0 c++ and -finline-limit oddities Teemu Torma
09:26 Re: 3.0 c++ and -finline-limit oddities Joe Buck
09:25 Re: Objective C features manual Joe Buck
09:22 Re: Pre-compiled GCC Paolo Carlini
09:20 Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++ Joe Buck
07:47 Re: [Slightly OT] Linking speed Paolo Carlini
07:43 run-time function call tree displayer Nicolas Devillard
07:36 Re: [Slightly OT] Linking speed Andreas Jaeger
07:28 Re: [Slightly OT] Linking speed Paolo Carlini
06:59 [Slightly OT] Linking speed biswapesh.chattopadhyay
06:58 Re: question Paolo Carlini
06:42 Re: question Tim Prince
06:38 Re: question Erik Mouw
06:38 Re: Objective C features manual Gerald Pfeifer
05:54 Re: Objective C features manual Joseph S. Myers
05:49 question Majid moghaddam
04:25 Re: Querry.... Erik Mouw
04:08 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Jan Hubicka
03:04 Re: Objective C features manual Gerald Pfeifer
01:31 Installation problem on Sun Solaris 2.7 Anshuman Mittal
00:52 3.0 c++ and -finline-limit oddities Teemu Torma
00:20 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Toon Moene
00:09 Re: Objective C features manual Ovidiu Predescu

May 08, 2001
22:56 Re: Querry.... Philip Blundell
21:51 Querry.... MNShukla
17:26 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
17:00 GCC IA-64 Summit Janis Johnson
16:50 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
12:54 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Richard Henderson
12:46 error on web page Gert Kok
12:08 Re: _FP_SETCW() tprinceusa
11:26 Primary hpux platform Georgas, James
11:19 Puzzles add4
11:02 Objective C features manual Joseph S. Myers
11:00 Re: array delete size mismatch - feature or bug? Neil Booth
10:33 _FP_SETCW() Philippe Desprs
09:49 RE: Pre-compiled GCC Rozenblum, Danny
09:47 Re: Pre-compiled GCC Paolo Carlini
09:45 Re: Pre-compiled GCC Gordon Sadler
08:30 Re: Q) link error of template class Gordon Sadler
08:24 Pre-compiled GCC Rozenblum, Danny
07:59 gcc on Mac OS X Franco Vaccari
07:02 invoking gcc multiple times in the same process Fergus Henderson
07:01 Q) link error of template class =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?sei/67z2?=
06:28 Re: peephole vs. scheduler David Edelsohn
06:12 Alignment in bits or bytes? Kazu Hirata
06:10 array delete size mismatch - feature or bug? Christian Szegedy
06:06 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Mark Mitchell
05:44 Re: gcc 3.0 C++ STL Alexandre Oliva
05:33 gcc 3.0 C++ STL keith-c.mitchell
05:30 Re: migrating libraries Alexandre Oliva
04:51 migrating libraries deepak22j
03:06 GCC for Motorola's processor? Chus
02:47 Re: RFC: additions to the machine-definition language Alexandre Oliva
02:44 Re: RFA: non-const libcalls Alexandre Oliva
01:29 Re: RFC: additions to the machine-definition language Dan Nicolaescu
01:13 RFA: non-const libcalls Mark Mitchell
00:57 Template specialization problem Ryszard Kabatek
00:38 Re: How to build 32bit standed alone exe file? Alexandre Oliva
00:37 Re: RFC: additions to the machine-definition language Alexandre Oliva
00:32 Re: gcc for Sun Solaris 64 bit Alexandre Oliva
00:16 Re: Could somebody help me on function pointer? Alexandre Oliva

May 07, 2001
23:01 How to build 32bit standed alone exe file? Zhu ZhenXiong
22:47 Re: I need help for changing the java driver (gcj and libs with a main()) Bryce McKinlay
21:38 Re: peephole vs. scheduler law
19:06 How to build 32bit standed alone exe file? Zhu ZhenXiong
18:59 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Fergus Henderson
18:10 RFC: additions to the machine-definition language Dan Nicolaescu
18:03 peephole vs. scheduler dalej
17:15 gcc-ss-20010507 is now available law
17:10 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
16:40 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
16:18 Re: gcc & g4 processor? Stan Shebs
16:09 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
16:04 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
15:54 gcc for Sun Solaris 64 bit Qian Cui
15:42 Re: Common Language Runtime Miguel de Icaza
14:58 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? H . J . Lu
14:57 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
14:53 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
14:51 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
14:40 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mike Stump
14:39 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Joseph S. Myers
14:33 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
14:29 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
14:28 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Joseph S. Myers
14:22 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? H . J . Lu
13:57 contrib/gcc_update (was: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava) Gerald Pfeifer
13:55 Re: Cray T3E port Gerald Pfeifer
13:43 Re: Common Language Runtime Jim Wilson
12:36 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
12:31 Re: TOY Tim Josling
12:29 Re: NeXT not supported? Stan Shebs
12:13 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
11:27 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Martin Costabel
11:17 Re: size of derived classes - misfeature of gcc? Ingo Krabbe
10:54 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Fergus Henderson
10:26 Re: gcc & g4 processor? Mike Stump
10:12 Re: size of derived classes - misfeature of gcc? Mike Stump
10:05 Re: gcc & g4 processor? David Edelsohn
09:59 Re: gcc & g4 processor? adam morley
09:52 Re: gcc & g4 processor? David Edelsohn
09:32 Re: TOY Joseph S. Myers
09:28 Re: TOY Fergus Henderson
09:25 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
09:14 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joe Buck
08:28 gcc & g4 processor? adam morley
08:01 Re: TOY Gerald Pfeifer
07:00 Re: size of derived classes - misfeature of gcc? Jakub Jelinek
06:45 size of derived classes - misfeature of gcc? Christian Szegedy
06:13 I need help for changing the java driver (gcj and libs with a main()) Martin Kahlert
04:28 Re: documentation in PDF format proposal Erik Mouw
01:25 documentation in PDF format proposal Geert Poels

May 06, 2001
23:41 Re: Cray T3E port Andreas Jaeger
23:24 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Phil Edwards
23:20 Re: Exploring the option to submit the CR16 compilersourcecodeto GNU Gali Carmel
21:36 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Jeff Sturm
19:41 Could somebody help me on function pointer? Ge Zhu
15:14 Re: TOY Joseph S. Myers
13:42 Re: TOY Tim Josling
13:32 TOY Tim Josling
13:25 Re: template bug Alexandre Oliva
11:39 RFA: check_dbra_loop Mark Mitchell
10:35 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Alexandre Oliva
10:13 template bug Florin Iucha
10:07 Re: DWARF2 Regression Mark Mitchell
09:59 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
09:33 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
07:35 Re: Common Language Runtime Doug Ransom
07:00 Re: Cray T3E port Joseph S. Myers
06:47 Cray T3E port Roman Lechtchinsky
06:41 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Bryce McKinlay
05:54 Re: libffi "configure: warning: This is beta code." Bryce McKinlay
05:15 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:18 Re: Querry.-- Philip Blundell
03:44 Re: Querry.-- Erik Mouw
00:13 NeXT not supported? David Rogers

May 05, 2001
22:48 Querry.-- MNShukla
19:55 Re: Common Language Runtime Tim Prince
17:00 Common Language Runtime Doug Ransom
16:55 Common Language Runtime Doug Ransom
11:34 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
11:28 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Mark Mitchell
11:22 Re: GNATS - I give up Joseph S. Myers
10:50 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Andreas Schwab
10:29 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Michael Meeks
08:38 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Fergus Henderson
08:32 GNATS - I give up Neil Booth
08:29 heres those pictures i promised ilikecum
03:37 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Richard Kenner
02:37 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Jeff Sturm
02:17 Re: brokent link Gerald Pfeifer
02:06 libffi "configure: warning: This is beta code." Gerald Pfeifer
01:55 Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_INLINE__ if not inlining (take 2) Neil Booth

May 04, 2001
20:55 Re: Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems David A. Gatwood
20:48 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Gordon Sadler
20:38 Re: libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Jeff Sturm
19:43 libjava gcc-3_0-branch, klass timing out in testsuite again Gordon Sadler
16:53 Re: DWARF2 Regression Richard Henderson
16:38 Still hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
16:15 Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_INLINE__ if not inlining (take 2) Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:06 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
15:37 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Joseph S. Myers
15:33 Re: How to handle linker options beginning with -f? law
15:29 How to handle linker options beginning with -f? Stan Shebs
14:42 Re: gcc support for AVR Denis Chertykov
14:37 Re: DWARF2 Regression Jim Wilson
14:05 Re: Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
12:48 Pending patch Denis Chertykov
12:32 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Tim Josling
11:47 Re: GCC problem Alexandre Oliva
11:45 Re: installing GCC (success?) Alexandre Oliva
11:41 C++ and pedantic-errors for gcc extensions. Theodore Papadopoulo
11:39 Re: Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems John David Anglin
11:39 Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/longlong.c Neil Booth
11:24 Re: CLIB Zack Weinberg
11:17 Re: Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
10:13 Re: brokent link Joseph S. Myers
09:36 GCC problem Fabio Pacione
09:31 GCC problem Fabio Pacione
09:26 Re: brokent link Gerald Pfeifer
09:09 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:09 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Michael Meeks
07:57 Re: Gnu C/C++ and Aix 4.3.3.0 David Edelsohn
07:44 Re: Gnu C/C++ and AIX 4.3.3.0 Paolo Carlini
07:12 Gnu C/C++ and AIX 4.3.3.0 Akram Elmosa
07:06 Gnu C/C++ and Aix 4.3.3.0 Akram Elmosa
06:21 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers dewar
06:20 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers dewar
04:24 Re: -m32 only ia32 compiler? Jakub Jelinek
04:04 Re: -m32 only ia32 compiler? Jan Hubicka
03:35 Re: installing GCC Martin Kahlert
03:00 installing GCC (success?) Lester June Cabrera
02:40 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Richard Kenner
02:22 Re: CLIB Richard Kenner
02:04 installing GCC Lester June Cabrera

May 03, 2001
23:46 Re: -m32 only ia32 compiler? Andreas Jaeger
23:38 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Geoff Keating
23:30 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Mark Mitchell
23:14 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers David Edelsohn
23:06 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Daniel Berlin
22:58 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Mark Mitchell
22:50 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Daniel Berlin
22:47 Re: CLIB Zack Weinberg
22:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Mark Mitchell
22:14 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix -O3 Daniel Berlin
22:02 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
21:10 Re: Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems John David Anglin
20:31 Undefined symbols when declaring ones own allocator. Carlo Wood
19:33 DWARF2 Regression Mark Mitchell
19:32 Re: codeview support? Daniel Berlin
19:24 codeview support? Matt
19:14 Re: (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:11 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David O'Brien
19:01 Re: egcs vs. gcc Tim Prince
18:39 Re: Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems Stan Shebs
18:37 Re: egcs vs. gcc Mike Stump
18:27 Re: CLIB Zack Weinberg
18:03 Too hard, was: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
17:50 egcs vs. gcc Szasz Pal
16:45 RE: Querry.-- 2/5/01 Jrgen Pfeifer
16:04 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David Edelsohn
15:51 Re: Querry.-- 2/5/01 Philip Blundell
15:11 Re: gcc compiler and static arrays. Robert Bernecky
14:53 gcc compiler and static arrays. J T
14:36 Re: ARM Thumb byte stores Jonathan Larmour
13:41 Re: Patches pending review Mark Mitchell
13:17 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David O'Brien
13:08 Re: CLIB Richard Kenner
13:01 Re: Patches pending review Alexandre Oliva
12:40 Re: Patches pending review Mark Mitchell
11:02 Re: -m32 only ia32 compiler? Alexandre Oliva
10:46 -m32 only ia32 compiler? Jakub Jelinek
10:44 GCC Christopher Fournier
10:43 Re: CLIB Zack Weinberg
10:27 Re: Shared library initializers Alexandre Oliva
10:26 Re: Inlining of vararg functions Jakub Jelinek
10:22 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Alexandre Oliva
10:05 Re: Inlining of vararg functions Dale Johannesen
09:15 Re: Shared library initializers Carlo Wood
09:04 Re: Manuals Gerald Pfeifer
08:56 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
08:41 Patches pending review Joseph S. Myers
08:18 Re: Querry.-- 2/5/01 Nick Clifton
07:33 Re: shared library initializers - more info needed Alexandre Oliva
07:31 Re: GCC Alexandre Oliva
07:24 shared library initializers - more info needed Jeff Parker
07:20 GCC BABICA, Rasto
07:09 Re: Shared library initializers Craig Rodrigues
07:05 Re: Shared library initializers Alexandre Oliva
06:53 Re: Shared library initializers Carlo Wood
06:41 casesi Pattern James Montgomerie
05:57 Shared library initializers Jeff Parker
05:12 Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac3, asm problem in asm-i386/rwsem.h using gcc 3.0 CVS Christian Iseli
05:01 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Alexandre Oliva
04:46 Re: add to mailing list Alexandre Oliva
04:20 add to mailing list Robert Leibl
04:06 Re: brokent link Joseph S. Myers
04:04 Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac3, asm problem in asm-i386/rwsem.h using gcc 3.0 CVS Alexandre Oliva
03:57 Re: brokent link Alexandre Oliva
03:53 Re: Query:linking Alexandre Oliva
03:51 Re: Support for Solaris 7 / 64bit kernel ? Alexandre Oliva
03:49 CLIB Richard Kenner
03:05 Query:linking Bipin T S
02:40 Re: Inlining of vararg functions Peter Simons
02:12 Querry.-- 2/5/01 MNShukla
02:08 Re: Inlining of vararg functions Nathan Sidwell
01:42 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX Kevin Buettner
01:39 Support for Solaris 7 / 64bit kernel ? Fredrik Pettai
01:36 Inlining of vararg functions Peter Simons
01:18 Re: Major revision of CPP manual - draft available for comment Nathan Sidwell
00:39 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David O'Brien

May 02, 2001
23:35 Re: finding strict aliasing problems H . J . Lu
23:25 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX Zack Weinberg
23:18 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Zack Weinberg
22:00 Re: INSTALL_ASSERT_H Joseph S. Myers
20:52 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David Edelsohn
20:32 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David O'Brien
20:07 Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David Edelsohn
19:39 Printable?? Joel Taylor
19:23 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Carlo Wood
19:03 Re: INSTALL_ASSERT_H Russ Allbery
18:21 [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion David O'Brien
16:43 Re: INSTALL_ASSERT_H Mike Stump
16:09 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mike Stump
15:44 Re: ICE gcc-3_0-branch in java code 1 May 2001 Jeffrey Oldham
15:10 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) At150bogomips
14:56 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Tom Leete
14:47 Re: INSTALL_ASSERT_H Zack Weinberg
14:07 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Toon Moene
14:06 Re: INSTALL_ASSERT_H H . J . Lu
12:57 Re: g77 Build Problems Martin Costabel
11:23 PR 2702 Mark Mitchell
11:22 (f)lex & poisoned malloc / free in system.h Michael Meeks
10:36 INSTALL_ASSERT_H David O'Brien
09:07 Linux 2.4.4-ac3, asm problem in asm-i386/rwsem.h using gcc 3.0 CVS Christian Iseli
08:48 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Scott A Crosby
08:47 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
07:32 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Jan Hubicka
05:23 brokent link Laurent Vaills
04:50 Re: Manuals Joseph S. Myers
04:37 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Andreas Schwab
00:52 Re: Manuals Zack Weinberg
00:28 Re: g77 Build Problems Toon Moene
00:13 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Joe Buck
00:06 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Joe Buck

May 01, 2001
23:58 Manuals Bob Kruit
21:36 Re: Major revision of CPP manual - draft available for comment Neil Booth
21:24 Re: Major revision of CPP manual - draft available for comment Zack Weinberg
21:09 Re: Major revision of CPP manual - draft available for comment Neil Booth
19:21 a must read Mike Stump
19:00 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Mike Stump
18:56 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mike Stump
18:13 Re: g77 Build Problems Stan Shebs
18:00 Re: g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
17:22 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
16:37 Re: ICE gcc-3_0-branch in java code 1 May 2001 Jeff Sturm
16:31 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Olaf Dietsche
16:26 gcc support for AVR Jason Hill
15:57 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Brad Lucier
15:38 elliottsweb.com welcome1
14:25 Re: redirecting g77 compiler output to file, under DOS DJ Delorie
14:21 Re: g77 Build Problems Toon Moene
14:11 Re: Exploring the option to submit the CR16 compiler sourcecode to GNU DJ Delorie
14:07 Re: g77 Build Problems Fergus Henderson
13:54 Re: g77 Build Problems Toon Moene
13:34 Re: Trivial question Alexandre Oliva
13:34 Re: redirecting g77 compiler output to file, under DOS Alexandre Oliva
12:50 Merging simplify-rtx, fold_rtx Daniel Berlin
12:46 fdl.texi missing Andreas Schwab
12:34 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Mike Stump
12:23 Re: GCC on PC Windows 95 Platform Jeff Sturm
12:15 GCC on PC Windows 95 Platform Jean-Marie Dirand
12:03 Hello everyone Ethan J. Sudman
12:00 sparc inlining-sibcall crash (regression from 2.95.2) Dan Nicolaescu
11:55 Re: Exploring the option to submit the CR16 compiler sourcecode toGNU Joseph S. Myers
11:38 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Albert Chin-A-Young
11:35 Re: Exploring the option to submit the CR16 compiler sourcecode to GNU Geoff Keating
09:45 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Richard Kenner
09:42 ICE gcc-3_0-branch in java code 1 May 2001 Gordon Sadler
09:35 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Jean Francois Martinez
09:21 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Gabriel Dos Reis
09:19 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Olaf Dietsche
09:19 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Olaf Dietsche
09:15 Re: Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) Carlo Wood
08:59 Re: Patches waiting for review/testing Christopher Faylor
08:49 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Mike Stump
08:09 Some optimization thoughts (and thanks!) At150bogomips
08:03 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? H . J . Lu
08:00 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? DJ Delorie
07:55 Re: Historical query - time.h, sys/time.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:44 redirecting g77 compiler output to file, under DOS H.-B. Schuttler
07:11 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Sam TH
07:04 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Mike Harrold
06:46 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Nathan Sidwell
06:37 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Mike Harrold
06:07 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Robert Schweikert
05:51 Re: ARM PR2237 Richard Earnshaw
05:10 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Jason Merrill
04:31 massive money give away samlikescock
03:52 worlds best porn site peopleperverts
01:36 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Jakub Jelinek
01:10 Re: Patches waiting for review/testing Zack Weinberg
00:43 Re: finding strict aliasing problems Joe Buck
00:01 finding strict aliasing problems Brad Lucier


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.7