This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch

To: law at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:01:33 -0700
Cc: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200104250323.XAA05283@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca><464.988328838@slagheap.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "law" == law  <law@redhat.com> writes:

    law> I've started poking at this, but I don't have a real clear
    law> understanding of the C++ language or its EH semantics.  About
    law> the only tidbit I've got that might be helpful is that we
    law> might be missing a call to cp_pop_exception.

I'm delighted that we're making progress on HPUX.  That's exciting.

Of course, RTH is getting ready to stand EH on its head.  So, unless
this happens on the mainline, it's probaby not worth looking at; the
whole land of exceptions is going to turn upside down RSN.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch
  - From: law

References:
- Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]