This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Subject: Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 19 Apr 2001 23:05:03 -0600
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>, Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
References: <87eluo9v3k.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104192213130.12840-100000@one-point.bright.net> <20010419193450.K21961@stanford.edu> <3ADFAFC3.1329298F@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> At this point I'm starting to think that we should just bite
Bryce> the bullet and link libgcj against libstdc++, at least if we
Bryce> can be fairly confident that the ABI for libstdc++ is going to
Bryce> remain fairly stable.

My understanding is that with the new EH code, we no longer need the
EH support in libsupc++.

It would be worth experimenting on the trunk to see if we need
libsupc++ at all any more.  It is possible we could arrange things so
that we don't need libsupc++ at all.

Furthermore, my understanding is that the new EH code is going to be
merged to the branch.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]