This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why is this code accepted?

To: nbecker at fred dot net
Subject: Re: Why is this code accepted?
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 17 Apr 2001 18:51:45 -0300
Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <200104162158.OAA20152@kankakee.wrs.com><ork84kdxne.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><x888zkz68on.fsf@adglinux1.hns.com>

On Apr 17, 2001, nbecker@fred.net wrote:

> If it doesn't work shouldn't gcc reject it?

Nope.  How would GCC tell that the static data member isn't going to
be defined in another translation unit?  That's why this rule doesn't
require a diagnostic from the compiler.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- Re: Why is this code accepted?
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Why is this code accepted?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Why is this code accepted?
  - From: nbecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]