This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libtool, java woes

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: libtool, java woes
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:00:39 -0700
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, jsturm at one-point dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <ork84uvuf3.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010410121203K.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <87u23w2qp3.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20010410182659F.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:26:59PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I still don't think you should link in libsupc++, though.  Instead, we
> should package the EH code separately, as a shared object, or put it
> back in libgcc.  (Having it in libgcc doesn't prevent using other
> personality routines for outher languages.)  

I don't think we should put the C++ eh runtime support in libgcc,
nor any "common" eh library.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libtool, java woes
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]