This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: Re: dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:13 +1200
- CC: "'Alexandre Oliva'" <aoliva at redhat dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5D54@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
"Boehm, Hans" wrote:
> 3) If object allocation notifications are requested, it does some messy
> JVMPI allocation profiling stuff. I think this is currently compiled in by
> default? I don't understand the full history or current status here, but
> I'd be inclined to turn it off by default.
I was not aware that the JVMPI stuff is being compiled in. I agree: it should
be turned off unless "--enable-libgcj-profile" or whatever is given to
configure.
In any case, this (not having _Jv_AllocObject(), at least for common cases) is
is definatly where we want to go. Actually, I think I've mentioned this before
on one of my GCJ wishlist rants ;-)
regards
[ bryce ]