This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" oflibtool

To: aoliva at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" oflibtool
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:35:52 -0700
Cc: rittle at rsch dot comm dot mot dot com, rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200104110555.f3B5ttM56238@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com><20010410231936P.mitchell@codesourcery.com><or66gbgocl.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

    Alexandre> I'd much rather have local annotations of GCC-local
    Alexandre> changes, if they're at all needed.  I did look for such

Why put markers in the source?  

We have CVS to keep track of these kinds of things -- that's what tags
and vendor branches are for.

Even now, I would suggest importing the most recent version of libtool
into our repository just so that the next time we do this all it takes
is something like:

  cvs update -j -r libtool_1_0 -r libtool_2_0 

to get the changes.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" oflibtool
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Reapply patch lost during recent "blind import" of libtool
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]