This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: Re: dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 10 Apr 2001 17:22:04 -0300
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5D4C@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
On Apr 10, 2001, "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> wrote:
>> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:aoliva@redhat.com]
>> We either need libsupc++ to be a shared library, that both libstdc++
>> and libgcj depend on, or have libgcj depend on libstdc++.
> I'm seeing significant overheads as a result of dynamic library
> calls.
In this particular case, it would make no difference at all: libsupc++
is already compiled as PIC, even though it's a static library.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me