This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
- Subject: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 17:35:57 -0700
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
While building complex_io.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu, on the 3.0 branch, I
get:
In file included from /usr/include/math.h:348,
from ../../../../libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/bits/std_cmath.h:43,
from ../../../../libstdc++-v3/include/bits/std_complex.h:43,
from ../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/complex_io.cc:30:
/usr/include/bits/mathinline.h: In function `long int lrintf(float)':
/usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:583: output number 0 not directly addressable
/usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:583: inconsistent operand constraints in an
`asm'
That seems to refer to this code:
#define __lrint_code \
long int __lrintres; \
__asm__ __volatile__ \
("fistpl %0" \
: "=m" (__lrintres) : "t" (__x) : "st"); \
return __lrintres
__MATH_INLINE long int
lrintf (float __x)
{
__lrint_code;
}
I am frustruated. Many of the recent x86 patches have not been tested
adequately.
I will identify the offending patch and remove it, unless I hear
quickly that someone else understands the problem.
And, henceforth let's have *no* x86-64 specific patches on the
branch.
This is not a primary or secondary target for GCC 3.0, since the chip
is not in production yet. There is no reason for patches that address
only x86-64, and not ia32, issues to be included on the branch.
Please place these changes on the mainline only.
Thank you,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com