This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time

To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>
Subject: Re: March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 07:50:12 +0100
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200103301832.KAA18461@oz.codesourcery.com> <3AC847F6.72BB5018@codesourcery.com> <20010403114823.A8473@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20010402192438.B7609@stanford.edu>

Zack Weinberg wrote:-

> There is a nice fringe benefit: shell scripts will all run at least
> twice as fast.  But be careful, doing this can break system scripts.
> Debian's are pretty good, and still I file a couple of bugs every
> month due to bashisms in init.d or post-install scripts or whatever.

I think I'll install ash too.  I've noticed quite a few Debian 
ChangeLogs recently talking about removing bashisms; I assume some
were found by you :-)

Neil.

References:
- Re: March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]