gcc archive
date index for April, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2001
23:54 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? H . J . Lu
23:14 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? DJ Delorie
23:03 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Fergus Henderson
22:08 Historical query - time.h, sys/time.h Zack Weinberg
21:50 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? dewar
19:59 BROKEN_LDEXP - still useful? Zack Weinberg
19:36 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Jim Wilson
17:13 gcc-ss-20010430 is now available law
16:13 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Per Bothner
15:40 g77 Build Problems Henry B. Hotz
15:14 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: Patches waiting for review/testing Christopher Faylor
14:30 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? DJ Delorie
14:20 Re: Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX David Edelsohn
14:14 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Michael Meissner
14:07 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Mark Mitchell
14:01 Re: Patches waiting for review/testing Richard Henderson
13:49 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Fergus Henderson
13:15 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Olaf Dietsche
12:56 g77 Dr. Rafael E. Carlos Reyes
11:41 Re: Compile time assertions for gcc Fergus Henderson
11:28 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Geoff Keating
11:28 Re: C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Fergus Henderson
11:28 Patches waiting for review/testing Zack Weinberg
08:59 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
06:52 Re: Compile time assertions for gcc David Howells
00:02 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Per Bothner

April 29, 2001
23:24 Spring Time TonerCity USA
19:49 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Robert Schweikert
15:46 Major revision of CPP manual - draft available for comment Zack Weinberg
14:10 C++: why implicit delete in destructor? Olaf Dietsche
13:11 Plugins [was Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava] Rob Johnson
12:50 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Mark Mitchell
12:47 Parlis.com Parlis.com
12:36 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Mark Mitchell
12:33 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Mark Mitchell
05:59 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Richard Kenner
05:20 Re: libstdc++, threads and cvs-gcc Gabriel Dos Reis
04:32 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Jan Hubicka
04:30 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Jan Hubicka
04:11 Trivial question Takis Psarogiannakopoulos

April 28, 2001
20:04 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Tim Hollebeek
19:46 Re: type_info::__is_pointer_p() not working? Doug Gregor
19:32 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Richard Kenner
19:30 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Richard Kenner
19:21 type_info::__is_pointer_p() not working? Carlo Wood
16:16 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Zack Weinberg
16:02 -mno-ieee-fp related sig 11 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
15:13 binutils 2.11.90.0.7 is released. H . J . Lu
14:59 Re: Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Joseph S. Myers
13:30 Policy proposal - CPP_PREDEFINES Zack Weinberg
11:54 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Jan Hubicka
11:47 libstdc++, threads and cvs-gcc Dennis Bjorklund
10:43 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
09:55 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
07:14 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Fergus Henderson
06:53 Re: CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Richard Kenner
06:01 [Fwd: (SC22WG5.2051) Looking for Fortran] Toon Moene
05:02 CPROP and spec2000 slowdown in mid february Jan Hubicka
01:37 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Gerald Pfeifer

April 27, 2001
17:43 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
17:04 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
16:11 Re: ICE in propagate_one_insn. Bug in my port? Greg McGary
15:43 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Joern Rennecke
15:38 Re: ObjC vs function-at-a-time Mark Mitchell
15:14 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
15:03 ICE in propagate_one_insn. Bug in my port? Greg McGary
14:17 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Brad Lucier
13:39 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Tom Tromey
12:48 Re: Gcc for OSF5.1 Rainer Orth
12:42 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Leo Mauro
12:08 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Geoff Keating
12:04 Re: check-g++ fails Michael Ritzert
11:59 Re: ObjC vs function-at-a-time Stan Shebs
11:49 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Robert Schweikert
11:33 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? DJ Delorie
10:43 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
10:31 Re: check-g++ fails Phil Edwards
10:30 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Robert Schweikert
10:19 Re: Specifying command line arguments in a file? Matt Hiller
10:02 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
10:01 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
09:48 Re: -funroll-loops regression in gcc3.0 Dale Johannesen
09:07 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Robert Lipe
07:27 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Philipp Thomas
07:26 Specifying command line arguments in a file? Robert Schweikert
07:24 Compile time assertions for gcc David Howells
07:13 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Philipp Thomas
06:48 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Gordon Sadler
06:39 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Gabriel Dos Reis
06:17 RE: Confued with an Install Question David Korn
06:00 RE: bug with initialisation of global variables in a library (C++, gcc 2.95.2) Kris Thielemans
05:21 Re: check-g++ fails Michael Ritzert
05:17 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Nathan Sidwell
04:25 Re: check-g++ fails Michael Ritzert
03:48 Re: Gcc for OSF5.1 Fergus Henderson
03:09 check-g++ fails Michael Ritzert
03:07 mainline Java in much better shape... Andrew Haley
02:50 ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Zack Weinberg
02:44 mainline Java in much better shape... Zack Weinberg
02:43 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Nathan Sidwell

April 26, 2001
23:42 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Gabriel Dos Reis
21:45 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Phil Edwards
20:14 Re: PR2076 Geoff Keating
19:47 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Brad Lucier
19:45 Re: ObjC vs function-at-a-time Mark Mitchell
19:06 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Tom Tromey
19:06 ObjC vs function-at-a-time Stan Shebs
18:08 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Mark Mitchell
18:02 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Jason Merrill
17:29 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
17:19 Re: PR2076 David Edelsohn
17:07 Confued with an Install Question Doug Cabell
17:02 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
16:49 Re: RFC Possible typo find_base_decl alias.c law
16:45 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
16:22 Re: Pokupaem b/u zapcasti dlj avtomobilej KamAZ Phil Edwards
15:59 Re: problem while compiling Binutils On Solaris Mike Stump
15:43 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava Brad Lucier
14:17 Re: Fortran and testsuite Toon Moene
14:08 binutils 2.11.90.0.6 is released. H . J . Lu
14:08 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Alexandre Oliva
14:07 Re: Problem with library path Alexandre Oliva
14:07 Re: Gcc for OSF5.1 Alexandre Oliva
14:03 Re: [c++] bug 2628 and new Mike Stump
13:46 Re: PR2076 Dale Johannesen
13:42 PR2116: Reload problem Mark Mitchell
13:12 problem while compiling Binutils On Solaris Rajah, PushpamX
11:42 Re: [c++] bug 2628 and new Mark Mitchell
11:31 Installing GCC: Final installation Post, Mark K
10:55 C++ front-end options Mark Mitchell
10:36 RFC Possible typo get_low_bound dependence.c Graham Stott
10:32 Re: PR2076 Dale Johannesen
10:25 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
10:20 RFC Possible typo find_base_decl alias.c Graham Stott
10:19 Re: [c++] bug 2628 and new Gabriel Dos Reis
10:14 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Mark Mitchell
10:03 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
10:03 Re: bug with initialisation of global variables in a library (C++, gcc 2.95.2) Fergus Henderson
10:02 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
09:58 Re: [c++] bug 2628 and new Theodore Papadopoulo
09:57 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Fergus Henderson
09:31 Re: Permission For Kerberos Russ Allbery
09:17 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots DJ Delorie
09:15 Re: [c++] bug 2628 and new Gabriel Dos Reis
09:10 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Gabriel Dos Reis
09:07 Re: A gcc 3.0 patch for Linux/MIPS to bring it close to other Linux. H . J . Lu
09:03 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots Greg McGary
08:51 Test Drive Chamberlain, James
08:44 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Nathan Sidwell
08:31 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
08:12 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Jason Merrill
08:00 [c++] bug 2628 and new Nathan Sidwell
07:56 Gcc for OSF5.1 ROMEO Edouard
07:36 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots law
07:08 bug with initialisation of global variables in a library (C++, gcc 2.95.2) Kris Thielemans
07:05 Re: bug 2645 and restrict Gabriel Dos Reis
06:51 Problem with library path Mirek Marciniszyn
06:36 Problem with library path Mirek Marciniszyn
04:59 http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/news/dependencies.html Bohdan Vlasyuk
02:08 bug 2645 and restrict Nathan Sidwell

April 25, 2001
23:31 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Alexandre Oliva
22:49 Re: help!!! Zack Weinberg
22:07 Re: Permission For Kerberos Alexandre Oliva
21:59 Permission For Kerberos babyayu *smile*
21:58 Re: help!!! Robert Bernecky
21:19 Re: Gnugcc for hpux10.10 Alexandre Oliva
20:42 Re: help!!! Robert Bernecky
20:32 help!!! Patrice Henry
19:46 Re: Current GCC seems to be worse in Spec95 Diego Novillo
19:24 Gnugcc for hpux10.10 shima
18:55 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots Joern Rennecke
18:45 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots Greg McGary
18:40 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots Greg McGary
18:30 Re: PR2076 David Edelsohn
18:09 Re: Unfillable branch delay slots Joern Rennecke
17:39 Re: ARM PR2237 Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
17:15 Unfillable branch delay slots Greg McGary
17:05 Re: PR2076 Dale Johannesen
17:03 Re: PR2076 Dale Johannesen
16:51 Re: PR2076 David Edelsohn
16:33 Re: PR2076 David Edelsohn
16:23 Re: PR2076 Geoff Keating
16:14 Re: PR2076 Richard Henderson
16:12 Re: PR2076 Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: PR2076 Geoff Keating
16:02 Re: PR2076 David Edelsohn
15:30 Re: ARM PR2237 Philip Blundell
15:25 Re: ARM PR2237 Philip Blundell
14:46 Re: PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Jakub Jelinek
14:41 Automated testers Mark Mitchell
14:33 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
14:23 Re: PR2076 Stan Shebs
14:17 Re: PR2076 Richard Henderson
14:13 ARM PR2237 Mark Mitchell
14:07 Re: PR2076 Dale Johannesen
14:04 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
14:00 Re: PR2076 Geoff Keating
13:36 Re: PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Mark Mitchell
13:35 Re: PR2076 Mark Mitchell
13:32 Re: PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Richard Henderson
13:21 Re: PR2076 Richard Henderson
13:17 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
13:16 Re: PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Mark Mitchell
12:48 Re: wild load in gcc3 law
12:35 Re: PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Richard Henderson
12:34 Fortran and testsuite Peter Schmid
12:27 Re: PR2076 Geoff Keating
12:20 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Geoff Keating
11:58 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
11:55 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Alexandre Oliva
11:54 PR2076 Mark Mitchell
11:45 Re: (mem (plus (mem (plus ... Greg McGary
11:36 wild load in gcc3 dalej
11:28 Re: (mem (plus (mem (plus ... Michael Meissner
11:18 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
11:13 Re: (mem (plus (mem (plus ... DJ Delorie
11:06 ¹«·á·Î µå¸³´Ï´Ù.(50ºÐ¿¡°Ô¸¸) E4 µµ¿ì¹ÌÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
10:56 Re: gcc 2.95.3 compile problem Rod Stewart
10:43 Limited success with 3.0 branch on AIX Matthew Conway
10:29 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Janis Johnson
10:26 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
10:23 (mem (plus (mem (plus ... Greg McGary
10:00 Re: Widening bitfields for arguments Joseph S. Myers
09:58 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
09:29 Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
09:10 Re: Current GCC seems to be worse in Spec95 Diego Novillo
09:09 Widening bitfields for arguments Jakub Jelinek
08:52 Re: Current GCC seems to be worse in Spec95 law
08:17 Re: Java programs segfault on exit Marcus G. Daniels
07:11 RE: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Rob Taylor
06:06 libstdc++-v3 std::string performance peter.zijlstra
05:26 Re: Current GCC seems to be worse in Spec95 Diego Novillo
05:00 Hacking EH support for EPOC Hannu Koivisto
03:48 Current GCC seems to be worse in Spec95 Andreas Jaeger
03:27 Re: Java programs segfault on exit Andrew Haley
02:51 ¹«·á·Î µå¸³´Ï´Ù.(50ºÐ¿¡°Ô¸¸) E4 µµ¿ì¹ÌÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
02:09 Re: Java programs segfault on exit Andrew Haley
02:08 Re: 32->64 bit cross compilers Bo Thorsen
00:31 how to understand gcc source code Xinhe Guo
00:10 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gabriel Dos Reis

April 24, 2001
23:24 gcc 2.95.3 compile problem Hsieh.AB
20:23 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
20:23 Re: Java programs segfault on exit Marcus G. Daniels
19:53 Re: Java programs segfault on exit Bryce McKinlay
19:41 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:32 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Bryce McKinlay
19:21 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
19:05 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Tom Tromey
18:55 PATCH: Fix DWARF2 section lossage Mark Mitchell
18:45 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:27 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck Benjamin Kosnik
17:21 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Ulrich Drepper
17:09 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck Benjamin Kosnik
17:02 Re: SPARC PR1902: Help required Mark Mitchell
16:51 Re: SPARC PR1902: Help required Geoff Keating
16:43 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Jason Merrill
15:46 32->64 bit cross compilers Mark Mitchell
15:31 SPARC PR1902: Help required Mark Mitchell
15:24 Re: questions on c++ Alexandre Oliva
13:40 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Stan Shebs
13:34 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Joseph S. Myers
12:50 RE: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Anthony Green
12:49 Java programs segfault on exit Andrew Haley
12:47 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Stan Shebs
12:42 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Stan Shebs
12:20 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gabriel Dos Reis
12:06 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Tim Hollebeek
11:41 Re: AS/400 Support? David Edelsohn
11:22 Re: compile times: Success with gcc300 Mark Mitchell
10:38 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Tom Tromey
10:24 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Tom Tromey
10:20 RE: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Anthony Green
10:04 questions on c++ N'guessan KRE
09:52 Re: Getch() waits for a keypress... Maurizio Umberto Puxeddu
09:46 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Benjamin Kosnik
08:59 Re: Getch() waits for a keypress... Philipp Thomas
08:40 Re: Getch() waits for a keypress... Mike Stump
07:49 Re: Getch() waits for a keypress... Programma Computer
07:27 Re: Getch() waits for a keypress... Alexandre Oliva
07:16 Getch() waits for a keypress... Programma Computer
07:00 Test, don't read Programma Computer
03:54 Re: Failed to compile G++ 3.0 on NetBSD Alexandre Oliva
03:53 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Philipp Thomas
03:29 Re: [gcc-3.0 bug?] C++ symbols treated as C Andrey Slepuhin
00:54 Re: Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Paolo Carlini
00:01 AS/400 Support? J. S.

April 23, 2001
22:31 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
21:45 gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gordon Sadler
21:04 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Anthony Green
20:15 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Richard Henderson
20:12 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Marcus G. Daniels
20:10 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Richard Henderson
20:05 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
19:50 Re: __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Geoff Keating
19:49 Re: libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Bryce McKinlay
19:30 __attribute__ ((deprecated)) Stan Shebs
19:08 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Bryce McKinlay
18:26 Copyright assignment forms Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:38 Remove -fno-weak? Anthony Green
17:12 compile times: Success with gcc300 Kurt Garloff
17:10 gcc-ss-20010423 is now available law
16:52 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Richard Henderson
16:39 Re: Maintainer tools Dave Korn
15:55 libjava/net/natInetAddress.cc uses inet_pton, not declared on irix6.2 Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:21 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
15:20 c++/2617 Sengan
14:45 Re: no no in SuSE 7.1 Philipp Thomas
14:20 gcc.c-torture/execute/longlong.c Joern Rennecke
13:39 Re: Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Phil Edwards
12:46 RE: Maintainer tools Bruce Korb
12:44 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Richard Henderson
12:40 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Jeffrey Oldham
12:13 Re: ARM in thumb mode Philip Blundell
12:05 Re: ARM in thumb mode Rafael Rodríguez Velilla
11:05 Re: Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Paolo Carlini
10:49 Re: Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:42 Re: Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Benjamin Kosnik
10:39 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
10:06 Long long & templates (was: Re: Loki's tricky templates) Paolo Carlini
09:44 Re: Loki's tricky templates Gabriel Dos Reis
09:23 Re: Loki's tricky templates Paolo Carlini
09:12 Re: Link problems with PowerPC cross-compiler Joe MacDonald
09:09 Re: gcc-20010416 snapshot bootstrap problem(Solaris 2.7) Alexandre Oliva
09:05 Re: Loki's tricky templates Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
08:56 RE: Maintainer tools David Korn
08:45 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
08:29 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
08:19 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
08:14 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
08:08 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
08:03 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
07:59 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
07:56 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Bernd Schmidt
07:55 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Bernd Schmidt
07:51 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Andrew Haley
07:51 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch law
07:51 Link problems with PowerPC cross-compiler Joe MacDonald
07:15 Re: ARM in thumb mode Nick Clifton
07:09 Failed to compile G++ 3.0 on NetBSD Kilobug
07:04 =?koi8-r?B?8M/L1dDBxc0gwi/VINrB0N7B09TJIMTM0SDB19TPzc/CyczFyiDrwc3h+g?= =?koi8-r?B?5MXOydM?=
05:32 Re: ARM in thumb mode Rafael Rodríguez Velilla
05:18 gcc-20010416 snapshot bootstrap problem(Solaris 2.7) Nemat Rakhmatov
02:18 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Bernd Schmidt
01:11 Re: ARM in thumb mode Philip Blundell
01:08 ARM in thumb mode Rafael Rodríguez Velilla

April 22, 2001
22:34 [gcc-3.0 bug?] C++ symbols treated as C Andrey Slepuhin
19:52 Re: Gcc and SCO 5.0.6 OpenServer Robert Lipe
17:18 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
16:26 bootstrap failure SCO OSR 5 Jean-Pierre Radley
16:22 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
14:54 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
13:48 Re: Loki's tricky templates Paolo Carlini
09:49 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Joseph S. Myers
09:36 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Fergus Henderson
08:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Fergus Henderson
08:40 Re: error in compiling module for kernel Erik Mouw
08:25 Re: Debug format (-g -ggdb -gstabs ...) Daniel Berlin
07:59 Re: PR target/843 Philip Blundell
07:44 Re: PR target/843 Richard Earnshaw
07:32 Re: PR target/843 Richard Earnshaw
05:28 Re: GNATS documentation Joseph S. Myers
03:56 32-bit, 32bit or 32 bit in documentation? Andreas Jaeger
02:13 Re: error in compiling module for kernel Alexandre Oliva
01:39 Re: Loki's tricky templates Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
01:35 error in compiling module for kernel adersh miglani

April 21, 2001
23:47 Debug format (-g -ggdb -gstabs ...) Gordon Sadler
20:38 gcc-3.0-branch objc failing make check w/--enable-shared Gordon Sadler
19:33 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
17:14 Gcc and SCO 5.0.6 OpenServer Steve day
16:05 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
15:14 Re: GCC C Compiler Eric Christopher
11:52 GNATS documentation Mark Mitchell
11:44 PR target/843 Philip Blundell
10:34 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Peter Schmid
10:29 Loki again (from Singleton.h) Paolo Carlini
10:11 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
10:02 Job in the Internet. Mihail
08:49 Re: Loki's tricky templates Paolo Carlini
07:27 Re: Loki's tricky templates Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
04:17 GCC C Compiler Sathya narayanan

April 20, 2001
22:40 Re: no no in SuSE 7.1 Andreas Jaeger
21:31 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch David Edelsohn
21:29 Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch John David Anglin
18:55 Re: no no in SuSE 7.1 Phil Edwards
18:03 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Jeff Sturm
17:31 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
16:58 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Peter Schmid
16:36 Re: Loki's tricky templates Paolo Carlini
16:27 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Bryce McKinlay
15:51 no no in SuSE 7.1 Robert Bernecky
15:27 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Jeff Sturm
14:52 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Jeffrey Oldham
14:50 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Gordon Sadler
14:48 Re: Loki's tricky templates Phil Edwards
14:14 Loki's tricky templates Paolo Carlini
14:04 Re: Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Theodore Papadopoulo
13:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
11:21 Pooma 2.3 Test Code Available to Test gcc 3.0 Jeffrey Oldham
10:53 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Joe Buck
10:16 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Jeff Sturm
09:47 C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch Jeffrey A Law
03:29 Re: Query... Philip Blundell
00:39 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Mark Mitchell

April 19, 2001
23:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
23:30 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Jeff Sturm
22:41 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
22:24 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
22:14 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Richard Henderson
21:54 Re: Query... MNShukla
21:52 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
21:34 ¿Eµo±zªº¼ç¤O Power_up_your_business
20:39 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Bryce McKinlay
20:33 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck H . J . Lu
20:18 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
19:56 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck H . J . Lu
19:49 Re: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Richard Stallman
19:37 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
19:34 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
19:26 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Jeff Sturm
19:24 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Bryce McKinlay
19:01 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
18:23 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
18:14 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
17:56 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
17:56 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Tom Tromey
17:54 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
17:47 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question law
17:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joe Buck
17:30 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Benjamin Kosnik
17:28 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question Benjamin Kosnik
15:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
14:32 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question Mark Mitchell
13:40 Re: Glibc - mailing list ? Sergey Ostrovsky
13:39 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Phil Edwards
13:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
13:32 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:17 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Joe Buck
13:15 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Joe Buck
13:11 Re: Glibc - mailing list ? Andreas Jaeger
13:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:01 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Andreas Jaeger
12:54 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Toon Moene
12:51 OT: Re: Glibc - mailing list ? Gordon Sadler
12:49 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question Alexandre Oliva
12:42 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question David Edelsohn
12:41 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question Benjamin Kosnik
12:36 Re: Status of GCC-2.96-RH Alexandre Oliva
12:28 Re: libstdc++-v3 configure question Joern Rennecke
12:11 libstdc++-v3 configure question Jeffrey A Law
12:01 Re: Fluffy intro to C frontend Neil Booth
11:22 Re: RFC: DWARF2 vs. qualified array types Jason Merrill
10:53 Re: Problems when linking Toshi Morita
10:45 Re: How do I link in more than one COFF file during the process of making an exe? DJ Delorie
10:42 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck H . J . Lu
10:28 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
10:24 Re: libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Alexandre Petit-Bianco
10:15 Re: Freezing CVS wwwdocs/htdocs/install. Mark Mitchell
10:13 Re: HPUX woes Mark Mitchell
10:12 libjava test suite keeps getting stuck Zack Weinberg
10:06 Re: Problems when linking Carlos Pita
10:02 RE: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Bruce Korb
09:58 Glibc - mailing list ? Sergey Ostrovsky
09:54 Re: How do I link in more than one COFF file during the process of making an exe? Toshi Morita
09:48 Re: Problems when linking Toshi Morita
09:47 Re: Query... Toshi Morita
09:36 Re: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Laurynas Biveinis
09:20 Status of GCC-2.96-RH JOSE LUIS RICARDO-CHAVEZ
08:57 Problems when linking Carlos Pita
08:40 Re: type of license used in GCC Mike Stump
08:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
08:09 type of license used in GCC Frank LaMonica
06:49 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
05:51 Re: Query... Nick Clifton
05:26 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Per Abrahamsen
04:46 Fluffy intro to C frontend Andrew Birkett
03:29 Query... MNShukla
02:22 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Jimen Ching
02:13 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Re: How do I link in more than one COFF file during the process of making an exe? Nick Clifton
00:04 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Fergus Henderson

April 18, 2001
23:45 gcc-20010416 - bootrstrap failure on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0b Ryszard Kabatek
23:39 How do I link in more than one COFF file during the process of making an exe? HassanAA33
23:32 Freezing CVS wwwdocs/htdocs/install. Gerald Pfeifer
23:09 Re: Class-through-ellipsis warning Artem Khodush
21:55 Re: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Richard Stallman
21:54 Class-through-ellipsis warning Ross Smith
20:35 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Christopher C. Chimelis
20:10 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue H . J . Lu
19:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
17:18 Re: debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Daniel Berlin
17:06 Re: debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Daniel Berlin
15:49 Re: debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Joern Rennecke
15:37 HPUX woes Jeffrey A Law
15:31 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mark Mitchell
15:13 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Neil Booth
15:12 Re: debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Daniel Berlin
14:36 Re: ObjC Webpages Stan Shebs
14:35 debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Joern Rennecke
14:34 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Jim Wilson
14:30 Re: precompiled headers can cause big slowdowns Stan Shebs
14:25 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Neil Booth
14:14 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Christopher C. Chimelis
13:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:49 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mark Mitchell
13:14 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Toon Moene
13:11 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Richard Henderson
13:05 gcc sig file Gadi Hus
12:54 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Neil Booth
12:52 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Joern Rennecke
12:41 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Jim Wilson
12:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
12:11 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Alexandre Oliva
12:11 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Alexandre Oliva
11:10 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joern Rennecke
11:02 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Neil Booth
10:59 Re: new attribute? Alan Lehotsky
10:46 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Neil Booth
10:38 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
10:37 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
10:14 Re: new attribute? Robert Lipe
10:07 RE: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Bruce Korb
10:03 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joern Rennecke
10:00 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joern Rennecke
09:51 new attribute? jeff
09:47 Re: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Laurynas Biveinis
09:22 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joe Buck
09:00 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
07:02 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Andreas Schwab
05:55 Re: Maintainer tools Richard Stallman
05:48 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Richard Earnshaw
01:51 compilercache 1.0.9 released Erik Thiele
01:27 Re: Interesting warnings for genrecog on i386 Jan Hubicka
00:55 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
00:13 Re: Bootstrap assembler issue Alexandre Oliva

April 17, 2001
23:46 Bootstrap assembler issue Neil Booth
23:14 Re: Libgcc symbols Russ Allbery
23:11 Re: Libgcc symbols Russ Allbery
23:07 Re: ObjC Webpages Gerald Pfeifer
20:54 Great Buys !! Great Buys
20:38 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Daniel Berlin
20:01 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Michael Meissner
19:59 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Michael Meissner
19:46 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers David Edelsohn
19:41 Re: Why is this code accepted? Mike Stump
19:40 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers John Gilmore
19:20 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers John Gilmore
19:11 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
19:01 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Joe Buck
18:49 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joe Buck
18:40 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
18:38 Re: cccp Steve Beattie
18:23 Re: cccp Kai Henningsen
18:12 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mike Stump
18:07 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
18:01 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
17:57 Re: Libgcc symbols Joe Buck
17:56 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Fergus Henderson
17:52 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Joe Buck
17:41 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Chris Lattner
17:28 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
17:20 Re: Why is this code accepted? Mike Stump
17:05 PATCH: Re: Another 3.0-branch bootstrap failure Loren James Rittle
17:03 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Zack Weinberg
17:00 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
16:52 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
16:43 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
16:41 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
16:38 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Gabriel Dos Reis
16:37 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
16:36 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
16:36 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mark Mitchell
16:32 RE: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
16:31 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Toon Moene
16:28 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Greg McGary
16:17 Re: Libgcc symbols Joern Rennecke
16:16 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Daniel Berlin
16:13 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
16:10 Re: Libgcc symbols Michael Meissner
16:06 RE: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Chris Lattner
15:46 RE: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
15:45 Re: cygwin build problems on gcc-3_0-branch and main-trunk Christopher Faylor
15:38 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mark Mitchell
15:28 Re: gcc 2.95.3 for Solaris Robert Boehne
15:06 test message TESTER
15:03 Re: undeclared identifier Alexandre Oliva
15:00 RE: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Chris Lattner
14:52 Re: Why is this code accepted? Alexandre Oliva
14:00 Re: gcc 2.95.3 for Solaris Jeff Sturm
13:43 gcc 2.95.3 for Solaris Lewis Lisenby
13:40 Re: How to choose STL library? Phil Edwards
13:12 undeclared identifier Everard Kamphorst
13:12 Re: cccp Frank Ch. Eigler
13:02 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Daniel Berlin
13:01 RE: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Bruce Korb
12:29 Re: Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Geoff Keating
12:14 Re: Libgcc symbols dewar
12:11 Re: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Laurynas Biveinis
11:52 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Joe Buck
11:51 Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers Robert Bernecky
11:50 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Joe Buck
11:50 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Joe Buck
11:33 Re: Libgcc symbols Richard Kenner
11:29 Re: Libgcc symbols Richard Henderson
11:28 Re: WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS/LOAD_EXTEND_OP Joern Rennecke
11:23 Re: Libgcc symbols Richard Henderson
11:11 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Jakub Jelinek
11:05 Re: precompiled headers can cause big slowdowns Neil Booth
11:02 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Neil Booth
11:01 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Jim Wilson
10:52 RE: AutoGen as a GNU package Mark Mitchell
10:38 Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Andrew Cagney
10:37 RE: -Os & inlining functions used only once David Korn
10:32 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
10:30 Re: Interesting warnings for genrecog on i386 Matt Kraai
10:30 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Alexandre Duret-Lutz
10:28 RE: AutoGen + Guile for fixinc maintenance Bruce Korb
10:20 Re: cccp Zack Weinberg
10:14 Re: Here's a pretty puzzle... Joe Buck
10:04 Re: -Os & inlining functions used only once Joe Buck
10:02 Re: Build gcc-2.95.3 with UDK 7.1.1b anyone? Robert Lipe
09:47 Re: Build gcc-2.95.3 with UDK 7.1.1b anyone? Jean-Pierre Radley
09:45 Re: Build gcc-2.95.3 with UDK 7.1.1b anyone? Robert Lipe
09:38 -Os & inlining functions used only once Alexandre Duret-Lutz
08:57 Re: Build gcc-2.95.3 with UDK 7.1.1b anyone? Jean-Pierre Radley
08:57 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Daniel Berlin
08:56 Re: Bootstrap error in snapshot gcc-20010402 on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 Rainer Orth
08:22 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Mark Mitchell
08:04 Re: precompiled headers can cause big slowdowns Robert Lipe
07:20 precompiled headers can cause big slowdowns Fergus Henderson
06:44 RE: cccp David Korn
06:18 cccp J F
04:57 Re: Why is this code accepted? nbecker
03:52 RE: AutoGen as a GNU package David Korn
02:59 Hello David Feugey
01:31 RE: How to choose STL library? biswapesh.chattopadhyay
01:26 RE: cygwin build problems on gcc-3_0-branch and main-trunk Holejsovsky, Pavel
01:24 Re: Here's a pretty puzzle... Zack Weinberg
01:06 RE: Here's a pretty puzzle... Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
00:48 Re: Here's a pretty puzzle... Fergus Henderson
00:32 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
00:22 Re: Another 3.0-branch bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
00:07 Another 3.0-branch bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
00:03 Here's a pretty puzzle... Zack Weinberg

April 16, 2001
23:34 Linking problems with gcc-3.0 on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0d Ryszard Kabatek
20:24 Re: sparc64-linux-gcc questions Alexandre Oliva
20:16 Re: Why is this code accepted? Alexandre Oliva
20:15 Compiling POOMA 2.3.0 with gcc 3.0 Craig Rodrigues
18:52 Re: i860 live? Zack Weinberg
17:45