Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt

[Gordon Sadler <gbsadler1 at lcisp dot com>]

On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 09:20:17PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 11:14:32PM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > 2001-03-27  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
> > 
> >         * configure.in (CXX_FOR_TARGET): Use xgcc for libstdc++-v3.
> > 
> > I believe the top patch was needed to cause libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am
> > to do the right thing with linking. As right now my bootstraps have been
> > trying to use g++ and -lstdc++ to create libstdc++ -(.
> > 
> > However, configure is in CVS, so should probably be regenerated by
> > someone with appropriate autoconf and committed?
> > 
> 
> DON'T DO IT. Before anyone even thinks about it, please do
> 
> # more configure.in
> 
> first.
>
I think I see your point. configure.in is a template for cygnus
configure and not autoconf ? Note I did say 'appropriate autoconf',
guess I'm just too used to autoconf by now. However, the point still
stands, doesn't it? configure, by hook or crook -), needs to be
regenerated and committed?

Gordon Sadler