This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification?
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:38:57 -0800
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>,Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cambridge dot redhat dot com>,Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>,Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010315173134.F251@stanford.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103161513240.57163-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:14:46PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I will not support any change which is a performance improvement on
> > Linux and a lose on just about every other system in existence. (Do
> > recent BSDs have getcwd(2)?)
>
> You mean getcwd(3), right?
>
I think Zack did mean getcwd(2). Linux has system call support for
getcwd.
H.J.