Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC

[Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>]

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001, Geert Bosch wrote:
> 
> > Thanks a lot for setting this up, very useful!
> > One question, it seems that it would actually be very useful as well,
> > to have compilation times for compilig the spec benchmarks. That lets
> > us at least see the effect of trading off compilation speed for execution
> > speeds. It would be great if that could be added without too much trouble.
> > 
> Sure. The data is there in the runspec log file, so collecting it
> would be trivial. I need to think about what would be the best
> way of presenting it
> 
> We should have a separate chart for compilation times. I don't
> think we want to put compilation times in the SPEC chart because
> the scales are so different. Maybe having it side by side with
> the performance chart?
> 
> We should also have cutoff dates for historic data. Having all
> that daily info becomes meaningless after a while. Maybe take the
> average of the last 3-4 months and summarize them in one data
> point.

It might also be usefull to add "historic" version, e.g. 2.95.2, 2.7.2
and 2.8.1 to see how the current versions compare to those old
version.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj