gcc archive
date index for March, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2001
23:43 The CXX_FOR_TARGET change doesn't work at all. H . J . Lu
23:07 Re: gcc for winders Mumit Khan
22:26 Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt H . J . Lu
22:09 Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt Gordon Sadler
21:49 Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt Phil Edwards
21:33 Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt Gordon Sadler
21:20 Re: gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt H . J . Lu
21:14 gcc-3_0-branch configure.in modified, configure not rebuilt Gordon Sadler
20:52 Re: Suggestions Tim Prince
20:04 Re: Suggestions Phil Edwards
19:53 Suggestions Gordon Poon
18:55 Re: gcc for winders Phil Edwards
17:05 Re: C++ libgcc_s linkage problems with today's CVS Daniel Berlin
17:03 Re: gcc for winders Dave Korn
15:09 C++ libgcc_s linkage problems with today's CVS Marcus G. Daniels
14:07 bootstrap failures with CVS tip 2001-03-31 Marcus G. Daniels
13:06 scheduler first pass and destructive scheduling of REG_LIBCALL/REG_RETVAL blocks? Franz Sirl
10:38 Exception Handling in shared libraries. Michael Brown
06:03 info about gcc IcedRake
03:40 Re: Definitions of INSTALL Laurynas Biveinis
00:29 Re: Manual question Fergus Henderson
00:00 Re: RFA: gcc.c retry hack Fergus Henderson

March 30, 2001
22:32 Handle libgcc_s.so for glibc (Re: Definitions of INSTALL) H . J . Lu
20:44 Manual question rob
16:08 Definitions of INSTALL Joseph S. Myers
14:11 Re: gcc for winders Joe Buck
14:00 Re: g77 and tape handling functions Toon Moene
13:41 Grrr Brad Lucier
13:41 Re: gcc for winders Phil Edwards
13:36 Re: gcc for winders Joe Buck
12:34 Re: ia64-linux kernel panics when running tests for recent GCC snapshots Joe Buck
11:13 libgcc2 and MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD on ia64 Janis Johnson
10:32 March gcc 3.0 and 3.1 Bootstraps Fail 34% of Time Jeffrey Oldham
10:16 Re: Unresolved symbol on dec OSF 4 with gcc 2.95.2.3 Alexandre Oliva
09:24 ia64-linux kernel panics when running tests for recent GCC snapshots Janis Johnson
09:16 Unresolved symbol on dec OSF 4 with gcc 2.95.2.3 Brother Tuck
09:02 Re: gcc for winders Alexandre Oliva
08:50 Re: gcc for winders Carlos Pita
08:12 Re: RFA: gcc.c retry hack Joseph S. Myers
08:03 gcc for winders TEETER,VINCE (HP-USA,ex1)
07:26 Re: RE: throw lists and warnings Andrew Marlow
07:17 RE: throw lists and warnings David Korn
06:43 throw lists and warnings Andrew Marlow
06:43 Re: Make error (gcc) Jakub Jelinek
06:42 RE: Make error (gcc) David Korn
06:42 Bad constraint in asm Christian Iseli
06:36 RE: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Stephen M. Webb
06:15 Make error (gcc) Ezequiel Glinsky
05:58 Cannot bootstrap mainline compiler on i686-pc-linux-gnu Peter Schmid
05:01 RFA: gcc.c retry hack RDBrown
04:27 Hi! ganhuiganhui
03:50 compilercache Erik Thiele
03:08 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
01:49 Re: cout undefined symbol Alexandre Oliva
00:56 RE: cout undefined symbol Krishna Mohan
00:43 Re: Gcc testsuite Alexandre Oliva
00:26 Re: cout undefined symbol Alexandre Oliva
00:11 RE: cout undefined symbol Krishna Mohan

March 29, 2001
23:28 RE: cout undefined symbol Krishna Mohan
23:26 Re: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Alexandre Oliva
22:52 Re: GNU/GCC Web Pages Joe Buck
22:43 m68k-coff sp decrements on assignments Nick Papadonis
22:33 Re: cout undefined symbol Daniel Berlin
22:30 cout undefined symbol Krishna Mohan
21:45 GNU/GCC Web Pages Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS]
21:34 Re: portable signed right shift Fergus Henderson
21:08 gcc FAQ not working Christian Couder
20:45 Re: Your links don't work Daniel Berlin
19:34 Your links don't work John F. Tissieres
19:33 Re: GCC 2.95.3 missing __builtin_va_alist ? David Edelsohn
19:33 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
19:33 Multiple occurences of __floatsisf in libgcc.a Kazu Hirata
19:32 Re: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Magnus Fromreide
19:27 Opportunity Smart Marketing
19:27 Re: Archives: Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailinglist] Gerald Pfeifer
18:15 Re: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Craig Rodrigues
18:12 RE: GCC 2.95.3 missing __builtin_va_alist ? Boehne, Robert
18:09 Re: portable signed right shift Joern Rennecke
11:57 Re: portable signed right shift Tim Hollebeek
11:50 RE: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Boehm, Hans
11:49 Re: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Ross Smith
11:49 Gcc testsuite Nadezhda I. Viyukova

March 28, 2001
18:31 Re: portable signed right shift Fergus Henderson
18:23 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Fergus Henderson
18:11 Re: GCC 2.95.3 missing __builtin_va_alist ? Alexandre Oliva
18:04 FAQ website for Migrating C++ source from NT to Unix Timothy_Ko
17:49 Re: Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Craig Rodrigues
17:45 Override functions (Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix) Timothy_Ko
17:26 Re: how mmap() works Joe Buck
17:25 Migrating C++ source from Microsoft Windows NT to SCO Unix Timothy_Ko
17:24 GCC 2.95.3 missing __builtin_va_alist ? Robert Boehne
16:55 RE: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Alexandre Petit-Bianco
15:23 Re: libsupc++ changes broke libjava build?? Alexandre Oliva
15:22 Re: Compiling gcc 2.95.3 on DEC Alexandre Oliva
15:13 how mmap() works Jerry Hong
15:04 Re: portable signed right shift Geoff Keating
14:36 Re: Compiling gcc 2.95.3 on DEC Richard Henderson
14:34 Re: Dynix/ptx Richard Henderson
14:31 Re: portable signed right shift Richard Henderson
14:27 Re: portable signed right shift Joe Buck
13:49 Re: Small update to reversed comparison code Marc Espie
13:08 Re: portable signed right shift Geoff Keating
12:26 Re: portable signed right shift Joseph S. Myers
11:51 Re: portable signed right shift Ross Smith
11:19 RE: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Boehm, Hans
11:14 problems contacting you guys... george r goffe
10:21 Re: libsupc++ changes broke libjava build?? Phil Edwards
09:50 Re: Dynix/ptx Robert Lipe
09:33 Re: Dynix/ptx Janis Johnson
09:08 RE: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Boehm, Hans
08:54 compilercache Erik Thiele
08:31 RE: Compiling gcc 2.95.3 on DEC biswapesh.chattopadhyay
08:03 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Joern Rennecke
08:00 Compiling gcc 2.95.3 on DEC biswapesh.chattopadhyay
07:00 Re: Dynix/ptx Robert Lipe
06:55 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Richard Kenner
04:31 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
04:22 Code generator for 16 bits embedded controller Geer, Joris Van Der (Joris)
04:05 Re: gcc-ss-20010326 is now available Andreas Schwab
03:35 Re: libsupc++ changes broke libjava build?? Benjamin Kosnik
02:31 libsupc++ changes broke libjava build?? Bryce McKinlay
02:10 Re: portable signed right shift Toshi Morita
01:05 Re: GCC 3.0 Open Issues List feedback Dennis Bjorklund
00:46 Dynix/ptx biswapesh.chattopadhyay

March 27, 2001
22:28 Re: insmod Manik Raina
22:19 insmod Sachin Shah
21:09 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Jeff Sturm
20:20 Re: portable signed right shift Scott A Crosby
19:36 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
19:08 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Richard Henderson
19:02 Re: portable signed right shift nbecker
18:51 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
18:34 Re: portable signed right shift Scott A Crosby
18:17 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Jeff Sturm
17:57 RE: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Boehm, Hans
16:30 Re: Redundant copies of builtin_function()? Fergus Henderson
16:02 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Richard Henderson
15:59 Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Richard Henderson
15:05 Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms Boehm, Hans
14:33 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
14:07 Redundant copies of builtin_function()? Samuel Figueroa
13:55 Re: portable signed right shift Toshi Morita
13:53 Re: portable signed right shift Alexandre Oliva
13:49 Re: A C programmer David Edelsohn
13:46 Re: portable signed right shift dewar
13:34 Re: A C programmer Alexandre Oliva
13:15 portable signed right shift nbecker
11:39 A C programmer OGuerrero3
10:02 Copyright assignments for GCC manual Joseph S. Myers
09:58 Re: anon cvs access Joe Buck
09:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report David Edelsohn
09:35 Re: [new-regalloc] What's the status on the new allocator? Dan Nicolaescu
09:27 anon cvs access hopperj
09:12 Re: GCC 3.0 Open Issues List feedback Mark Mitchell
08:55 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
08:15 volunteer for testing and benchmarking GCC on mips-sgi-irix64 Martin Spott
07:46 gcc compile for libc upgrade Admin Mailing Lists
06:10 Question about cost macros... brahmaiah vallabhaneni
02:33 Re: Archives: Site Nav: ... RDBrown
02:23 Archives: Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list] RDBrown
01:14 Re: cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin

March 26, 2001
19:59 Re: How to get process info in Linux? Alexandre Oliva
17:28 Re: cross gcc port problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:12 gcc-ss-20010326 is now available law
14:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Open Issues List feedback Richard Henderson
12:31 [new-regalloc] What's the status on the new allocator? Peter Bergner
10:29 GCC 3.0 Open Issues List feedback Holder, John
10:24 Re: Patches waiting for review Stephane Carrez
08:12 Re: constrain two register operands to be distinct Alan Lehotsky
06:08 constrain two register operands to be distinct Soubhik Bhattacharya
05:05 enh rqst: warning about throw lists Andrew Marlow
00:22 Re: The gcc test result report is incomplete. Christian Iseli

March 25, 2001
23:30 Patches waiting for review Zack Weinberg
17:16 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Joseph S. Myers
16:09 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Marc Espie
11:04 Wide STRING_CSTs Joseph S. Myers

March 24, 2001
22:59 Re: Why so bad optimized code ? Daniel Berlin
22:43 Re: Why so bad optimized code ? Dave Korn
20:00 Re: DECL_FRAME_SIZE Richard Henderson
19:51 How to get process info in Linux? Jerry Hong
18:14 Re: DECL_FRAME_SIZE Mark Mitchell
15:39 Re: Conformance testing and gcc 3.0 Phil Edwards
14:42 Re: Why so bad optimized code ? Jamie Lokier
14:29 Re: Conformance testing and gcc 3.0 Craig Rodrigues
12:01 Re: Those obnoxious "mktemp is not safe" warnings Joseph S. Myers
04:25 Re: Those obnoxious "mktemp is not safe" warnings Marc Espie
03:54 Re: bootstrap error Michael Ritzert
03:19 bootstrap error Michael Ritzert

March 23, 2001
21:13 Grow a Money Tree From Home! J & D Incorporated
21:11 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
21:09 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
21:06 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline kumar
20:52 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
20:38 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline kumar
19:14 Re: Info on c# compiler for linux Joe Buck
18:58 Re: Info on c# compiler for linux dewar
18:55 Re: Info on c# compiler for linux Joe Buck
17:05 Optimizer bug -- known? Mike Oliver
15:30 Re: DECL_FRAME_SIZE Richard Henderson
14:24 Re: member templates and default parameter Phil Edwards
12:00 Re: armv4b support on 2.95.3? Rod Stewart
11:39 armv4b support on 2.95.3? Afzal, Naeem M
10:18 DECL_FRAME_SIZE Mark Mitchell
08:24 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline David Korn
08:05 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
07:35 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Jan Hubicka
07:29 RE: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline David Korn
07:05 Succesfully installed gcc on HPUX11 Dominique Dumont
06:56 Re: New CrossGCC FAQ maintainer needed? Joseph S. Myers
06:50 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
05:47 Re: GAS and PIC Marc Espie
01:19 gcc-2.95.3 at LynxOS/x86 v3.0.0 salikova

March 22, 2001
23:19 Error compiling snapshot gcc-20010320 on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 Himanshu Agrawal
22:48 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline kumar
21:14 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Daniel Berlin
19:54 g77 and tape handling functions Anna Wilson
19:39 Re: Why does dynamic relocation change depending on the optimization Stephen Smith
17:21 Re: New CrossGCC FAQ maintainer needed? Gerald Pfeifer
16:33 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Dave Korn
16:08 Redefinition of typedefs, and ## Joseph A. Latone
15:41 Re: Proposal to evaporate OBJC_INT_SELECTORS Ovidiu Predescu
15:30 Proposal to evaporate OBJC_INT_SELECTORS Stan Shebs
15:28 Re: [PATCH] almost-trivial fix for MIPS -mlong64 + -membedded-pic Chris G. Demetriou
15:25 [PATCH] almost-trivial fix for MIPS -mlong64 + -membedded-pic Chris G. Demetriou
14:24 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Samuel Figueroa
13:26 Re: Why does dynamic relocation change depending on the optimization Geoff Keating
12:50 Interface to access stack frames Bharadwaj Yadavalli
12:28 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Jan Hubicka
12:19 Some benchmarks for different g++ versions (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Peter Schmid
11:25 Re: The gcc test result report is incomplete. H . J . Lu
11:08 missing link to 2001 gcc-archives Matt Kraai
10:56 Re: The gcc test result report is incomplete. Alexandre Oliva
10:43 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Samuel Figueroa
10:33 Re: New CrossGCC FAQ maintainer needed? Alexandre Oliva
10:27 The gcc test result report is incomplete. H . J . Lu
10:25 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Jan Hubicka
09:48 Why does dynamic relocation change depending on the optimization Stephen Smith
09:44 Re: Info on c# compiler for linux tprinceusa
09:12 Re: GAS and PIC H . J . Lu
07:49 Info on c# compiler for linux Marco Mangiante
07:45 Kirill
07:37 Re: New CrossGCC FAQ maintainer needed? bgat
06:18 Re: New CrossGCC FAQ maintainer needed? Alexandre Oliva
05:40 Re: member templates and default parameter Tim Hollebeek
05:00 RE: help me! David Korn
02:35 GAS and PIC Joseph S. Myers
02:25 Re: Use of fixincluded headers in bootstrap Joseph S. Myers
01:24 Re: Use of fixincluded headers in bootstrap Richard Henderson
01:21 Re: member templates and default parameter Nathan Sidwell
00:56 gcc-2.95.3: internal compiler error during libojc compilation Yann Droneaud

March 21, 2001
23:14 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Romain Dolbeau
20:56 Re: help me! Alexandre Oliva
20:55 Re: member templates and default parameter Alexandre Oliva
20:40 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Carlo Wood
18:10 Use of fixincluded headers in bootstrap Joseph S. Myers
17:34 help me! joini
17:20 member templates and default parameter Stefan Seefeld
16:18 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Phil Edwards
15:54 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Joern Rennecke
15:40 Re: Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Samuel Figueroa
15:29 Re: about porting gcc to a new platform Alexandre Oliva
15:28 Re: rs6000 struct returns Geoff Keating
15:26 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Alexandre Oliva
15:23 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Alexandre Oliva
13:24 about porting gcc to a new platform Ziang Hu
12:10 Re: Your patch to push_rounding Richard Henderson
10:58 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Chris G. Demetriou
10:58 Re: Your patch to push_rounding Jan Hubicka
10:55 Re: Your patch to push_rounding Richard Kenner
10:52 Re: Your patch to push_rounding Jan Hubicka
10:47 Your patch to push_rounding Richard Kenner
10:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Neil Booth
09:16 Want More Customer ? c@toyi.zzn.com
08:23 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Joe Buck
08:23 RE: problems using "objcopy" David Korn
06:53 problem with time.h Steven Geerts
06:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Colm Smyth
05:08 Beginner project suggestion: test-result dependancies RDBrown

March 20, 2001
23:32 Re: GCC testsuite philosophy? Neil Booth
23:27 Re: Allocating three consecutive registers? Lars Brinkhoff
23:00 RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 David Korn
21:26 Re: Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Gordon Sadler
21:12 Should gcc add RPATH for libstdc++.so? Craig Rodrigues
21:02 Re: GCC testsuite philosophy? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:37 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad dewar
18:03 Re: Why so bad optimized code ? Mike Stump
17:54 Re: GCC testsuite philosophy? Joseph S. Myers
17:16 GCC testsuite philosophy? Stan Shebs
16:57 Re: Help with new benchmark utility Janis Johnson
16:30 Re: Why so bad optimized code ? Joern Rennecke
16:15 Re: Help with new benchmark utility Joern Rennecke
14:36 Re: 2.95.4 plans Franz Sirl
12:45 Re: "Actual Bugs" in gcc.texi Richard Henderson
12:43 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Joern Rennecke
12:42 gcc-ss-20010320 is now available law
12:21 Re: libstdc++ configure time Mike Stump
11:49 Re: gcc-3 test Mark Mitchell
11:48 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Mark Mitchell
11:34 Why so bad optimized code ? Denis Chertykov
11:21 Re: Small question about snapshots Joe Buck
11:12 Re: lbasname (branch) Neil Booth
11:08 Re: lbasname (branch) DJ Delorie
10:57 Re: Help with new benchmark utility Neil Booth
10:56 Re: lbasname (branch) Neil Booth
10:47 Re: Question about PPC / libgcc.so / multilibs David Edelsohn
10:44 Re: gcc-3 test Craig Rodrigues
10:16 Build problem on Alpha in set_decl_assembler_name Richard Kenner
10:07 Re: Question about PPC / libgcc.so / multilibs Alexandre Oliva
09:36 Re: 2.95.4 plans H . J . Lu
09:15 Question about PPC / libgcc.so / multilibs Tom Tromey
09:03 Re: gcc-3 test Mark Mitchell
08:56 Re: Compiling Crafty ICE's on powerpc (was: RE: i386 backend) Franz Sirl
08:50 Re: lbasname (branch) DJ Delorie
08:46 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Franz Sirl
08:45 GCC2.95.3 Rafael Rodrguez Velilla
08:27 Re: cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin
08:22 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
08:19 Compiling Crafty ICE's on powerpc (was: RE: i386 backend) Brad Lucier
08:17 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
08:12 RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 David Korn
08:12 RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 David Korn
07:35 Small question about snapshots biswapesh.chattopadhyay
07:32 Re: i386 backend Andi Kleen
07:31 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
07:26 Re: Using snapshots Alexandre Oliva
07:18 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Phil Edwards
07:11 RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 David Korn
07:07 RE: i386 backend biswapesh.chattopadhyay
07:03 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Phil Edwards
07:00 Re: Using snapshots Joseph S. Myers
06:38 Using snapshots Torbjorn Granlund
06:29 Re: i386 backend Jamie Lokier
06:22 gcc-3 test nbecker
06:16 Re: i386 backend Tim Prince
06:02 Re: i386 backend Tim Prince
05:53 Re: i386 backend Ronald van Eijck
05:37 Re: Allocating three consecutive registers? Lars Brinkhoff
05:18 Couldn't build gcc-20010319 on i686-pc-linux/gnu Maurizio Loreti
05:16 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Franz Sirl
05:02 Re: Question about release 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
04:30 RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 David Korn
04:18 RE: GCC 3.0 Status Report Peter Bienstman
04:12 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Alexandre Oliva
04:10 Question about release 2.95.3 Hansjrg Petriffer
03:51 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
03:49 Re: i386 backend Jamie Lokier
03:43 Re: i386 backend Jamie Lokier
03:31 Re: GCC "releases" web page is missing 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
03:26 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Jamie Lokier
03:12 RE: i386 backend biswapesh.chattopadhyay
03:03 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andreas Schwab
02:54 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Venetis Ioannis
02:50 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Bernd Schmidt
02:49 Help with new benchmark utility William Gacquer
02:16 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Joseph S. Myers
02:16 Re: 2.95.4 plans Bernd Schmidt
02:14 RE: Commercial Support for GCC ? David Korn
01:54 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andreas Schwab
01:50 Re: Request for subscription Alexandre Oliva
01:48 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
01:43 "Actual Bugs" in gcc.texi Joseph S. Myers
01:20 Re: cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin
00:32 Re: rs6000 struct returns David Edelsohn
00:32 Request for subscription Lokesh Chugh
00:25 Re: gcc-ss-20010319 is now available Joseph S. Myers
00:23 lbasname (branch) Neil Booth

March 19, 2001
23:57 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
23:51 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
23:48 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
23:47 Re: i386 backend Neil Booth
23:43 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
23:39 Re: GCC "releases" web page is missing 2.95.3 Gerald Pfeifer
23:38 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
23:34 Re: libstdc++ configure time Neil Booth
23:32 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
23:22 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
23:19 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
22:42 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Michael Meissner
22:33 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
22:18 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
22:16 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg
21:21 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
21:19 Re: gcc-ss-20010319 is now available Alexandre Oliva
21:01 expand_binop vs libcalls DJ Delorie
20:59 Re: i386 backend Tim Prince
20:52 Re: rs6000 struct returns Michael Meissner
20:23 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg
20:21 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg
20:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
20:15 Re: 2.95.3 Alexandre Oliva
20:01 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
20:00 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
19:56 Re: libstdc++ configure time Alexandre Oliva
19:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Stan Shebs
19:07 gcc-ss-20010319 is now available law
19:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Daniel Berlin
18:59 Re: rs6000 struct returns David Edelsohn
18:51 Re: m68k-coff + remote debugging Mike Stump
18:42 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Stan Shebs
18:26 Re: rs6000 struct returns Michael Meissner
18:15 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Geoff Keating
18:15 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
18:11 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Daniel Berlin
17:50 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Joe Buck
17:48 Re: rs6000 struct returns Geoff Keating
17:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Daniel Berlin
17:26 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
17:23 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
17:23 Re: Allocating three consecutive registers? Joern Rennecke
17:17 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Geoff Keating
17:12 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Joe Buck
17:05 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes James Dennett
17:01 rs6000 struct returns James L. Dein
16:50 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Mark Mitchell
16:43 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Jeff Sturm
16:04 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
15:56 Re: #define POSIX, string.h and time.h Joseph S. Myers
15:47 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Joseph S. Myers
15:38 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Mark Mitchell
15:21 Re: #define POSIX, string.h and time.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:16 Re: Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Joseph S. Myers
15:12 Re: #define POSIX, string.h and time.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:11 Re: libstdc++ configure time Joern Rennecke
14:58 Re: i386 backend Neil Booth
14:57 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Neil Booth
14:54 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg
14:53 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andi Kleen
14:45 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Joseph S. Myers
14:33 Re: i386 backend James Dennett
14:27 Re: i386 backend David Edelsohn
14:17 Re: i386 backend Neil Booth
14:00 RE: i386 backend dewar
13:59 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andi Kleen
13:52 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Tom Tromey
13:48 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
13:44 Re: i386 backend dewar
13:42 Re: Commercial Support for GCC ? Craig Rodrigues
13:40 Re: i386 backend David Edelsohn
13:39 RE: i386 backend dewar
13:37 Warning regression with COMPARE fixes Mark Mitchell
13:35 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Craig Rodrigues
13:30 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad dewar
13:28 Re: i386 backend Lee Iverson
13:24 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Mark Mitchell
13:19 Strange link warning - string::nullref size changed Ed Hourigan
13:19 Re: Automated regression testing Geoff Keating
13:16 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
13:12 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Philipp Thomas
13:03 Re: i386 backend Jan Hubicka
12:57 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
12:57 Re: i386 backend dewar
12:48 Re: i386 backend Jan Hubicka
12:40 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
12:39 Re: cross gcc port problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:38 Commercial Support for GCC ? Robert Boehne
12:33 RE: i386 backend David Rasmussen
12:29 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Gabriel Dos Reis
12:23 GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
12:17 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files dewar
12:16 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad dewar
12:05 Re: 2.95.4 plans Manfred Hollstein
11:57 Re: 2.95.4 plans Nick Clifton
11:31 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
11:21 Re: i386 backend David Edelsohn
11:19 Re: i386 backend Jan Hubicka
11:12 i386 backend David Rasmussen
10:55 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Neil Booth
10:42 Re: libstdc++ configure time Andreas Schwab
10:29 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
09:58 GCC "releases" web page is missing 2.95.3 Jonathan Thornburg
09:50 #define POSIX, string.h and time.h Zack Weinberg
09:15 Re: 2.95.4 plans H . J . Lu
09:06 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andi Kleen
09:05 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Joe Buck
09:04 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Jamie Lokier
08:59 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Joe Buck
08:54 Re: libstdc++ configure time Phil Edwards
08:43 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Tom Tromey
08:42 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Andreas Schwab
08:36 Re: Help me! Craig Rodrigues
08:15 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Michael Meissner
07:50 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Franz Sirl
07:41 Re: 2.95.4 plans Manfred Hollstein
07:25 Re: libstdc++ configure time Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:15 Re: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
07:08 Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3 Venetis Ioannis
07:02 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andi Kleen
06:51 Re: Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Carlo Wood
05:54 problems using "objcopy" Ilan Kirschenbaum
05:37 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files dewar
05:34 Re: cross gcc port problem Alan Lehotsky
05:29 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Richard Kenner
05:16 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files dewar
03:46 Re: 2.95.3 Gerald Pfeifer
03:08 Re: 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
02:37 Multi line string literals are deprecated considered bad Andi Kleen
02:13 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Gerald Pfeifer
01:49 Re: libstdc++ configure time Andreas Schwab
01:03 Re: cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin
00:54 Re: cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin
00:25 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Zack Weinberg
00:23 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
00:19 Allocating three consecutive registers? Lars Brinkhoff
00:19 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg

March 18, 2001
23:55 Re: gcc/README.X11 Gerald Pfeifer
23:39 Re: What is chill? Bo Thorsen
23:36 Re: Re(2): GNU C++ compiler enhancement rqst Bo Thorsen
22:40 Re: gcc/README.X11 Jeffrey A Law
22:39 Re: Automated regression testing John Wehle
21:40 Re: libstdc++ configure time Phil Edwards
20:56 Re: Automated regression testing Geoff Keating
20:38 Automated regression testing John Wehle
20:31 Re: cross gcc port problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:53 Re: Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Richard Henderson
19:32 Re: DECL_RTL problem Mark Mitchell
19:31 Re: DECL_RTL problem Mark Mitchell
19:31 Extending xm_defines syntax to get rid of more xm-files Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:08 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
18:46 Re: libstdc++ configure time Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:40 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: DECL_RTL problem Rod Stewart
18:04 Re: libstdc++ configure time Colin Howell
17:42 [gccadmin] update_web_docs_libstdcxx Phil Edwards
17:20 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Philipp Thomas
17:19 Re: libstdc++ configure time Phil Edwards
17:11 Re: libstdc++ configure time Zack Weinberg
17:05 Re: libstdc++ configure time David Edelsohn
16:45 Re: libstdc++ configure time Phil Edwards
16:09 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Rod Stewart
16:03 Build problem on mainline for x86 Richard Kenner
15:15 What is chill? David Gressett
15:09 Re: DECL_RTL problem Rod Stewart
13:53 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Neil Booth
13:48 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Zack Weinberg
13:36 Re: cross gcc port problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:21 DECL_RTL problem Mark Mitchell
12:56 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
12:42 gcc/README.X11 Gerald Pfeifer
12:40 Re: Trunk: undefined reference to `__builtin_cos' Mark Mitchell
11:02 Downtime Jeffrey A Law
10:33 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Tom Tromey
07:54 Documentation maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
07:16 cross gcc port problem Oleg I. Vdovikin
05:08 Re: libstdc++ configure time Richard Kenner
04:27 Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree Laurynas Biveinis
03:41 Build: ASCII Host: EBCDIC (or vice versa) question. Neil Booth
01:54 libstdc++ configure time Richard Henderson
00:27 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Philipp Thomas

March 17, 2001
14:18 Re: specs file method for detecting when preprocessor is being called for C++? Christopher Faylor
10:56 Two new Fortran compile failures toon
10:49 Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree Alexandre Oliva
10:33 Re: 2.95.3 Carlo Wood
10:30 Re: specs file method for detecting when preprocessor is being called for C++? Neil Booth
09:35 specs file method for detecting when preprocessor is being called for C++? Christopher Faylor
09:28 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Christopher Faylor
07:27 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Akim Demaille
07:07 Trunk: undefined reference to `__builtin_cos' toon
06:43 Re: Structure Return Testcase toon
04:39 Re(2): GNU C++ compiler enhancement rqst Andrew Marlow
04:38 Re: why open output file if -fsyntax-only Nix
03:49 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Neil Booth
03:47 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Neil Booth
02:54 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Joseph S. Myers
00:06 Re: suggestion to improve optimization Herbert Xu

March 16, 2001
22:59 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Zack Weinberg
21:30 2.95.3 Russ Whitaker
20:28 m68k-coff + remote debugging Nick Papadonis
20:25 _GNU_SOURCE defined for g++, not for gcc Stefan Seefeld
19:21 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Christopher Faylor
19:04 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Richard Kenner
17:59 Help me! thietkn
17:43 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Zack Weinberg
17:18 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. David O'Brien
17:16 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Zack Weinberg
17:10 Re: GNU C++ compiler enhancement rqst Richard Henderson
17:08 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Richard Henderson
16:41 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mike Stump
16:28 Re: Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Mark Mitchell
16:12 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Phil Edwards
16:10 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Gerald Pfeifer
15:44 Re: RFD: RTX_UNCHANGING_P and other ways to optimize memrefs Joern Rennecke
15:41 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Phil Edwards
15:01 GNU C++ compiler enhancement rqst Andrew Marlow
14:10 Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Joseph S. Myers
14:04 Request for suggestions: xm-romp.h Zack Weinberg
13:50 Re: exceptions and gdb Jeff Sturm
13:23 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
13:03 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
12:57 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
12:15 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
12:13 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
11:29 Re: exceptions and gdb Phil Edwards
10:40 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Geoff Keating
10:24 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Zack Weinberg
10:18 Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree Laurynas Biveinis
10:00 Re: RFD: RTX_UNCHANGING_P and other ways to optimize memrefs Richard Kenner
09:15 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
09:15 Re: gcc Gerald Pfeifer
09:04 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
09:02 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
08:55 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Richard Kenner
08:52 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
08:51 RFD: RTX_UNCHANGING_P and other ways to optimize memrefs Bernd Schmidt
08:42 Re: gcc Craig Rodrigues
08:26 GPL and forks (was: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI?) Carlo Wood
08:21 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
08:18 2.95.4 plans Bernd Schmidt
08:14 Re: New branch for tree SSA work? David Edelsohn
08:13 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joe Buck
07:54 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL David Edelsohn
07:52 gcc-2.95.3 is released. Bernd Schmidt
07:40 gcc Jumblat, Ghassan
07:39 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? H . J . Lu
07:34 New branch for tree SSA work? Diego Novillo
07:29 Re: (C++) DECL_VIRTUAL_CONTEXT and debugging Jason Merrill
06:22 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Joseph S. Myers
06:16 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Gerald Pfeifer
05:30 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
05:03 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
05:00 Re: exceptions and gdb nbecker
04:06 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
03:58 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Richard Kenner
03:18 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Richard Kenner
02:55 nice Fortran 77 compatibility test prog Martin Kahlert
02:54 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Eli Zaretskii
02:17 Re: Do I need an installed gcc-3.1 to test it? Richard Henderson
02:17 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Geert Bosch
02:16 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Eli Zaretskii
00:58 Re: A Method Ben Jones

March 15, 2001
23:29 A Method =?gb2312?B?1cXUxrfl?=
23:20 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Robert Lipe
23:00 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL dewar
22:57 Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree Alexandre Oliva
22:53 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Zack Weinberg
22:36 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Robert Lipe
21:44 Re: Distributing GCC dynamic libs with commercial software? dewar
21:05 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
21:02 Re: Opinion on shell script portability, please Zack Weinberg
21:01 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
20:47 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:32 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:22 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
19:46 Re: Mangled names Doug Gregor
19:44 Do I need an installed gcc-3.1 to test it? Brad Lucier
19:40 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Robert Lipe
19:18 Re: Opinion on shell script portability, please Chris G. Demetriou
19:15 RE: Opinion on shell script portability, please Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:11 Re: Opinion on shell script portability, please John Wehle
19:10 Re: Opinion on shell script portability, please Chris G. Demetriou
19:04 Re: exceptions and gdb Daniel Berlin
19:03 Re: exceptions and gdb Daniel Berlin
18:39 Re: Structure Return Testcase Geoff Keating
18:39 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Richard Kenner
18:09 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: Structure Return Testcase Geoff Keating
18:06 Opinion on shell script portability, please Zack Weinberg
17:56 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
17:49 Re: My configuration problem Richard Kenner
17:31 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Zack Weinberg
17:17 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Mark Mitchell
17:04 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Frank Ch. Eigler
16:50 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Joern Rennecke
16:50 Re: Structure Return Testcase Loren James Rittle
16:49 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
16:46 Re: Structure Return Testcase Loren James Rittle
16:43 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Joern Rennecke
16:38 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
16:35 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
16:35 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Joseph S. Myers
16:16 Re: Structure Return Testcase dewar
16:11 Re: Structure Return Testcase Graham Stott
16:03 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
15:56 Re: Mangled names Mark Mitchell
15:54 Re: branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Gabriel Dos Reis
15:53 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
15:51 Re: Mangled names James Dennett
15:48 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
15:46 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
15:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Request David Edelsohn
15:41 Re: Structure Return Testcase Joseph S. Myers
15:35 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
15:34 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
15:30 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
15:30 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
15:28 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
15:25 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
15:24 Re: Structure Return Testcase Graham Stott
15:22 Re: Structure Return Testcase dewar
15:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Alexandre Oliva
15:08 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
15:03 Re: My configuration problem Zack Weinberg
15:01 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
14:54 Re: GCC 3.0 Request David Edelsohn
14:52 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
14:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Alexandre Oliva
14:42 Re: exceptions and gdb Richard Henderson
14:35 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
14:33 Re: Mangled names Mark Mitchell
14:22 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joern Rennecke
14:18 Re: G77 Alexandre Oliva
14:14 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:13 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Alexandre Oliva
14:13 Re: Mangled names Graham Stott
14:08 Re: automatic testing using a simulator Geoff Keating
14:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Geoff Keating
14:05 Re: bbreorder odity Richard Henderson
14:02 Re: bbreorder odity Dan Nicolaescu
13:24 Re: call insn in z80 Toshi Morita
13:24 Mangled names Mark Mitchell
13:18 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... Geoff Keating
13:08 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
12:59 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
12:57 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Andrew Cagney
12:50 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
12:49 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
12:43 Re: Structure Return Testcase Gabriel Dos Reis
12:29 Re: My configuration problem Richard Kenner
12:22 Re: call insn in z80 Stephane Carrez
12:21 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Christopher Faylor
12:16 Re: exceptions and gdb Jeff Sturm
12:08 Re: Structure Return Testcase Mark Mitchell
12:04 My configuration problem Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... H . J . Lu
11:38 exceptions and gdb nbecker
11:35 Re: call insn in z80 Mike Stump
11:33 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... Ralf Baechle
11:32 Re: Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
11:26 Re: Problem(?) with gcc version 3.0 20010313 (prerelease) Gordon Sadler
11:14 Configure problem on Alpha. Richard Kenner
11:07 Re: Structure Return Testcase Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: Structure Return Testcase Richard Henderson
10:56 Re: call insn in z80 Hartmut Schirmer
10:50 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Steinar Bang
10:21 Structure Return Testcase Jeffrey A Law
09:29 snapshot glitch Jeffrey A Law
09:27 gcc-ss-20010312 is now available law
09:20 branch bootstrap breakage in new DECL_RTL Robert Lipe
09:09 G77 RENTAS, RAUL X. (JSC-DF)
09:08 GCC-x86 Bobby McNulty Junior
08:56 Re: call insn in z80 Toshi Morita
08:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
08:30 Re: GCC 3.0 Request David Edelsohn
07:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Request David Edelsohn
06:59 Strange link warning - string::nullref size changed Ed Hourigan
06:42 Problem with g77 or bug? Martin Haefele
06:23 Problem(?) with gcc version 3.0 20010313 (prerelease) David Ronis
06:07 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... H . J . Lu
04:40 automatic testing using a simulator Michael Staudenmaier (r46720)
04:27 call insn in z80 brahmaiah vallabhaneni
03:12 Re: bootstrap failure on i586-pc-beos Sam TH
02:04 GCC 3.0 Request Mark Mitchell
01:56 Re: Conformance testing and gcc 3.0 Benjamin Kosnik
01:10 Re: bbreorder odity Richard Henderson
01:07 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Eli Zaretskii
00:36 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Yu Xuanwei
00:35 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
00:30 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Alexandre Oliva
00:23 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... Geoff Keating
00:10 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Neil Booth

March 14, 2001
23:37 Linux/MIPS is very much broken. H . J . Lu
22:09 Conformance testing and gcc 3.0 Craig Rodrigues
21:34 Re: Fixing MIPS target under GLIBC.... H . J . Lu
21:10 Re: bootstrap failure on i586-pc-beos Sam TH
21:05 Re: gcc-2.95.2 on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Alexandre Oliva
20:52 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Alexandre Oliva
20:29 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
20:24 fixup_var_refs trivia Zack Weinberg
20:23 Re: sjlj exceptions Jeff Sturm
19:43 Distributing GCC dynamic libs with commercial software? Steve Johnson
19:38 Re: sjlj exceptions Richard Henderson
19:35 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Daniel Berlin
19:13 Re: HP-UX 11.0 bootstrap Jeffrey A Law
18:22 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Christopher Faylor
18:20 gcc-2.95.2 on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Paul Szabo
17:48 Re: bootstrap failure on i586-pc-beos Daniel Berlin
17:23 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
17:22 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: sjlj exceptions Richard Henderson
16:59 Re: sjlj exceptions Bryce McKinlay
16:58 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Stan Shebs
16:41 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
16:31 Re: sjlj exceptions Richard Henderson
16:26 Re: mainline more jumpy than gcc-2.95.1 on x86 cucu
16:14 Re: g++ cannot compile hello.cpp! Phil Edwards
16:10 bootstrap failure on i586-pc-beos Sam TH
16:03 Re: sjlj exceptions Jeff Sturm
16:00 Re: Program Eric Christopher
15:57 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Sam TH
15:41 Re: g++ cannot compile hello.cpp! Craig Rodrigues
15:37 GCC... Brad Roberts
15:31 Re: GCC Compiler... Craig Rodrigues
15:30 Program Myke and Chelle
15:21 GCC... Brad Roberts
15:01 GCC Compiler... Brad Roberts
14:39 GCC compiler... Brad Roberts
14:37 g++ cannot compile hello.cpp! Patrice Belleville
13:56 Re: HP-UX 11.0 bootstrap Michael Ritzert
13:52 Re: HP-UX 11.0 bootstrap Michael Ritzert
13:51 Re: HP-UX 11.0 bootstrap Jeffrey A Law
13:49 Branch: undefined reference to `__builtin_cos' Toon Moene
13:40 HP-UX 11.0 bootstrap Michael Ritzert
13:39 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Daniel Berlin
13:39 Re: Use of single_set() in loop_regs_update() Jeffrey A Law
13:15 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Christopher Faylor
12:58 Re: g++ question Phil Edwards
12:09 g++ question Kennedy, Chris
11:57 Sigh ... Toon Moene
11:37 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
11:30 Re: sjlj exceptions Marc Espie
11:05 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? David Edelsohn
10:44 Re: ia64 sources Joe Buck
10:22 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Per Bothner
10:18 Use of single_set() in loop_regs_update() Richard Sandiford
10:16 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Phil Edwards
10:12 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Phil Edwards
09:21 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Laurynas Biveinis
09:21 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Laurynas Biveinis
09:05 RE: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines David Korn
09:02 Re: cursory analysis of the x-host fragments Mark Mitchell
08:59 Re: sjlj exceptions Mark Mitchell
08:47 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Joe Buck
08:23 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Matt Kraai
08:02 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Daniel Berlin
07:46 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Carlo Wood
07:46 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:39 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers David Edelsohn
07:37 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Sam TH
07:28 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Daniel Berlin
07:09 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Robert Lipe
05:07 Re: mainline more jumpy than gcc-2.95.1 on x86 dewar
05:01 ia64 sources brahmaiah vallabhaneni
05:01 Re: Fifth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available RDBrown
04:50 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
04:18 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code dewar
04:11 RE: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines David Korn
02:41 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Sam TH
02:26 bbreorder odity Dan Nicolaescu
02:26 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Sam TH
02:04 mainline more jumpy than gcc-2.95.1 on x86 Dan Nicolaescu
02:00 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Zack Weinberg
01:27 Re: Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Sam TH
00:59 cursory analysis of the x-host fragments Zack Weinberg
00:48 Re: -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Zack Weinberg
00:44 Analysis of remaining xm-host headers Zack Weinberg
00:29 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joseph S. Myers
00:11 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Benjamin Kosnik

March 13, 2001
23:44 -remap: Should we remap before / after simplification? Neil Booth
22:24 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Daniel Berlin
22:14 Test Surla, Neb
22:08 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Daniel Berlin
22:02 Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:10 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
20:53 Re: 9 bcopys (5 top dir, 4 cp dir), please help identify memmoves dewar
19:18 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
19:16 Re: sjlj exceptions Mike Stump
19:15 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mike Stump
19:01 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Phil Edwards
18:29 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
17:58 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
17:53 sjlj exceptions Richard Henderson
17:12 splitting expr and cse Paul Johnston
16:48 Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines) Phil Edwards
16:26 Re: Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Ovidiu Predescu
16:10 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mike Stump
15:51 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
15:44 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joe Buck
15:35 Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines) Neil Booth
15:33 Re: Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Joe Buck
14:35 Re: Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Stan Shebs
13:43 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer David Edelsohn
13:39 Re: Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Ovidiu Predescu
13:31 Re: Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Stan Shebs
13:22 Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:18 Re: Fifth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:15 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Daniel Berlin
13:04 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Fergus Henderson
12:55 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
12:46 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
12:39 diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines) Fergus Henderson
12:33 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
12:31 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mike Stump
12:30 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
12:19 Objective-C legacy code (ex: New Objective-C maintainer) Sven Koehler
12:13 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
12:03 Re: spurious asm movl with gcc 3.0 -fno-gcse Joern Rennecke
12:00 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
11:56 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Benjamin Kosnik
11:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Neil Booth
11:41 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Joe Buck
11:41 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
11:38 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Neil Booth
11:31 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
11:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Colm Smyth
11:19 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joseph S. Myers
11:15 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
11:13 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer David Edelsohn
11:11 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
10:58 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Theodore Papadopoulo
10:55 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Stan Shebs
10:51 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
10:35 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
10:29 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Daniel Berlin
10:24 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Joe Buck
10:22 Re: Turning the bootstrap checker into a facist... Phil Edwards
09:53 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
09:42 Re: Turning the bootstrap checker into a facist... Geoff Keating
09:35 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Craig Rodrigues
09:28 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Joe Buck
09:25 Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines Colm Smyth
09:22 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Joseph S. Myers
09:18 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Joe Buck
09:04 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Mark Mitchell
08:53 Turning the bootstrap checker into a facist... Phil Edwards
08:48 Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code Richard Kenner
06:33 Re: PLease help ! Alexandre Oliva
05:21 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Bernd Schmidt
03:51 Re: PLease help ! Erik Mouw
02:02 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
01:57 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
01:40 PLease help ! Sharon_Zehavi
01:00 Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Bryce McKinlay
00:46 Re: Could someone please test weak undefined symbol? Christian Iseli

March 12, 2001
23:44 Re: Projects for beginners Neil Booth
23:28 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Michael Scheibler
23:28 Re: Behavior of -Wtraditional WRT numeric suffixes and docs Neil Booth
20:21 Re: Projects for beginners Zack Weinberg
20:20 Behavior of -Wtraditional WRT numeric suffixes and docs Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:09 Re: Projects for beginners Fergus Henderson
20:02 Re: Projects for beginners Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:53 why open output file if -fsyntax-only Per Bothner
16:54 Re: GCJ/C++ name mangling incompatibility w/ "$" Bryce McKinlay
16:23 Re: GCJ/C++ name mangling incompatibility w/ "$" Joe Buck
16:20 Re: malloc / calloc / realloc changes Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:17 Re: C++ mangle bugs, anyone? Joe Buck
16:13 malloc / calloc / realloc changes Neil Booth
15:52 Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI? Craig Rodrigues
15:00 alias patch Jeffrey A Law
14:56 Re: EXPON_EXPR not used - remove? Toon Moene
14:22 Re: machine description for ARM7 Nick Clifton
14:05 Re: floating point formats, again Michael Hayes
13:49 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Joern Rennecke
13:37 Re: Does i18n work? Philipp Thomas
12:48 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Michael Meissner
11:30 Re: strange seg-fault Joe Buck
11:21 Re: Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Neil Booth
11:01 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Richard Kenner
10:20 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Richard Kenner
10:16 strange seg-fault Soubhik Bhattacharya
10:07 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Phil Edwards
09:59 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST David Edelsohn
09:51 Re: Could someone please test weak undefined symbol? Andreas Schwab
09:21 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Jeffrey A Law
09:04 x86_64 merger part 14 - use ANY_QI_REG_P where needed Jan Hubicka
09:04 x86_64 merger part 13 - accept *_MODIFY in '<' and '>' constraints Jan Hubicka
08:56 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Michael Meissner
08:53 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Michael Meissner
08:53 Re: Fifth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available H . J . Lu
08:46 Could someone please test weak undefined symbol? H . J . Lu
08:39 Re: 9 bcopys (5 top dir, 4 cp dir), please help identify memmoves Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:25 Re: floating point formats, again David Edelsohn
08:08 Re: floating point formats, again Gregory L Priem
08:03 Re: H8S and ELF format Jeffrey A Law
07:50 Fifth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available Bernd Schmidt
07:43 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Richard Kenner
07:34 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Jeffrey A Law
06:39 C++ mangle bugs, anyone? Carlo Wood
06:07 Re: gcc compilation problem:size_t defination Bibhas Kumar Samanta
05:07 Re: gcc compilation problem:size_t defination Gerald Pfeifer
04:47 gcc compilation problem:size_t defination Bibhas Kumar Samanta
04:30 Re: 2.95.3 update Bernd Schmidt
04:04 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Richard Kenner
02:43 Re: exotic floating point formats test Lars Brinkhoff
02:33 Re: Dec alias patch causing regressions Richard Kenner
02:02 Re: ARM r12 usage Richard Earnshaw
01:02 Re: 9 bcopys (5 top dir, 4 cp dir), please help identify memmoves Andreas Schwab
00:55 Re: H8S and ELF format hansi hansi

March 11, 2001
23:32 Re: exotic floating point formats test Zack Weinberg
23:22 Re: GCC Beginner's Projects Web Site Bill Wendling
23:18 Re: floating point formats, again Lars Brinkhoff
23:13 Re: exotic floating point formats test Lars Brinkhoff
23:07 Re: exotic floating point formats test Lars Brinkhoff
22:08 Re: floating point formats, again Zack Weinberg
21:55 Re: floating point formats, again David Edelsohn
21:42 floating point formats, again Zack Weinberg
20:31 Dec alias patch causing regressions Jeffrey A Law
19:10 Stan Shebs, new Objective-C maintainer Ovidiu Predescu
18:47 Re: EXPON_EXPR not used - remove? Joe Buck
18:21 binutils 2.11.90.0.1 for Linux is released. H . J . Lu
16:54 GCJ/C++ name mangling incompatibility w/ "$" Bryce McKinlay
15:00 EXPON_EXPR not used - remove? Tim Josling
13:45 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Neil Booth
13:40 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Roland McGrath
13:02 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST David Edelsohn
12:20 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Geoff Keating
11:27 Re: gcc2_compiled. vs GCC 3.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:41 9 bcopys (5 top dir, 4 cp dir), please help identify memmoves Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:30 Re: GCC Beginner's Projects Web Site Joseph S. Myers
04:27 machine description for ARM7 warmice
02:47 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Alexandre Oliva
01:53 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Geoff Keating
01:11 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Zack Weinberg
01:04 Re: Projects for beginners Zack Weinberg
00:58 PATCH Re: Testsuite documentation Gerald Pfeifer

March 10, 2001
23:03 GCC Beginner's Projects Web Site Bill Wendling
19:28 Re: exotic floating point formats test Rik van Riel
18:06 Re: Projects for beginners Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:26 Re: g++.oliva/delete3.C Alexandre Oliva
17:20 closing bug 667 for objc Nicola Pero
17:14 Re: Known bug Nicola Pero
16:31 g++.oliva/delete3.C Richard Henderson
16:05 Re: exotic floating point formats test Gregory L Priem
15:49 Re: exotic floating point formats test Kevin Handy
15:42 Re: 2.95.3 update Thorsten Kukuk
14:12 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Alexandre Oliva
14:00 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Geoff Keating
12:11 Re: exotic floating point formats test dewar
11:44 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Zack Weinberg
11:38 Re: exotic floating point formats test Zack Weinberg
06:38 Re: naser Tim Prince
03:08 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
03:04 Re: hash_scan_insn and single sets in a PARALLEL Richard Kenner
02:51 naser Naser Ramzan
02:03 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and--with-as Gerald Pfeifer
00:13 Re: exotic floating point formats test Lars Brinkhoff

March 09, 2001
22:28 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST David Edelsohn
21:25 Re: Proposed major change to combine Joern Rennecke
20:21 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Alexandre Oliva
20:15 Re: COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Michael Meissner
20:12 Re: Which compiler flag ??? Alexandre Oliva
19:16 Re: Solaris boostrap breakage Mark Mitchell
19:09 hash_scan_insn and single sets in a PARALLEL John Wehle
18:59 Re: Is this truly necessary? H . J . Lu
18:53 Re: Solaris boostrap breakage Richard Henderson
18:44 COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST Zack Weinberg
18:32 Solaris boostrap breakage Mark Mitchell
18:28 Re: spurious asm movl with gcc 3.0 -fno-gcse Brad Lucier
18:27 Re: exotic floating point formats test Zack Weinberg
18:16 Re: gcc2_compiled. vs GCC 3.0 Jim Wilson
18:12 Solaris .so and C++ exceptions Chris Kelly
17:49 Re: ARM r12 usage Andre
17:34 Is this truly necessary? Zack Weinberg
17:05 Re: exotic floating point formats test Michael Meissner
16:59 Re: gcc2_compiled. vs GCC 3.0 Joseph S. Myers
16:57 spurious asm movl with gcc 3.0 -fno-gcse Denys Duchier
16:49 Re: gcc2_compiled. vs GCC 3.0 Jim Wilson
15:32 Re: Snapshots Gerald Pfeifer
15:08 Re: -Os should default optimize to 2, without enforcing it Geoff Keating
14:58 Re: exotic floating point formats test Zack Weinberg
14:46 naser Naser Ramzan
14:38 Re: gcc 3.0 generates abysmal asm for bytecode emulator (bad register policy) Denys Duchier
14:35 Re: exotic floating point formats test David Edelsohn
14:23 exotic floating point formats test Zack Weinberg
14:20 Re: gcc 3.0 generates abysmal asm for bytecode emulator (bad register policy) Brad Lucier
14:16 gcc 3.0 generates abysmal asm for bytecode emulator (bad register policy) Denys Duchier
13:55 Re: Unexpected failures testing Gcc-2.95.3.test4 with Dejagnu Gerald Pfeifer
12:54 Re: Unexpected failures testing Gcc-2.95.3.test4 with Dejagnu Neil Booth
12:42 RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree Laurynas Biveinis
12:38 Unexpected failures testing Gcc-2.95.3.test4 with Dejagnu David Gressett
11:38 Re: Problems installing gcc Eric Christopher
11:34 Re: config GCC back end Eric Christopher
11:16 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Richard Kenner
11:07 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
10:15 Re: config GCC back end DJ Delorie
09:34 Re: ARM r12 usage Richard Earnshaw
09:07 Re: H8S and ELF format Jeffrey A Law
07:52 ARM r12 usage Andre
07:31 Problems installing gcc Charles Grab
07:25 Re: 2.95.3 update Bernd Schmidt
07:09 Re: Snapshots Joseph S. Myers
05:31 Known bug Volker Leonhard
03:48 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Bernd Schmidt
02:59 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
02:56 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
02:10 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Romain Dolbeau
01:50 gcc2_compiled. vs GCC 3.0 Dan Nicolaescu
01:44 H8S and ELF format hansi hansi
00:26 gcc-20010205 fails to compile qt-2.2.3 Matthias Welwarsky
00:18 should bugs in snapshots be reported, at this point? Steinar Bang

March 08, 2001
21:12 Re: secondary_reload_class Richard Henderson
21:10 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Henderson
21:07 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
19:14 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
18:46 Re: Proposed major change to combine Joern Rennecke
18:43 Re: Proposed major change to combine Joern Rennecke
18:38 Re: Proposed major change to combine Joern Rennecke
18:31 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
18:14 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
17:22 config GCC back end warmice
17:19 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John David Anglin
15:55 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
15:07 Re: Projects for beginners Zack Weinberg
14:58 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Gerald Pfeifer
14:55 Re: Boolean optimization Joern Rennecke
14:51 Re: -Dinhibit_libc H . J . Lu
14:31 GNATS feature requests Bryce McKinlay
14:01 Info Marco Mangiante
13:51 Re: C++ runtime system maintainer list update Phil Edwards
13:44 Re: Bug report: in g++, -O2 only Dima Volodin
13:32 Re: Proposed major change to combine Gerald Pfeifer
13:25 Re: Snapshots Gerald Pfeifer
13:13 RE: ICE for AutoGen-5.1.3 Marc Aurele La France
12:35 C++ runtime system maintainer list update Gabriel Dos Reis
12:26 Bug report: in g++, -O2 only Maurizio Loreti
12:00 Re: Reorganize -ffast-math code. Jim Wilson
11:54 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mike Stump
11:50 Re: Projects for beginners Neil Booth
11:45 Re: Reorganize -ffast-math code. Laurent Guerby
11:44 Re: Projects for beginners Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:08 Re: Projects for beginners Neil Booth
10:30 RE: ICE for AutoGen-5.1.3 Bruce Korb
09:54 Re: Fortran support for files greater than 2GB on Linux PC Richard Henderson
09:40 Re: Projects for beginners Kaveh R. Ghazi
09:32 Re: config GCC back end Alexandre Oliva
09:05 Re: Proposed major change to combine Michael Meissner
09:03 Re: Proposed major change to combine Michael Meissner
09:01 Re: Proposed major change to combine Jeffrey A Law
09:00 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:59 Re: config GCC back end Fergus Henderson
08:42 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Bernd Schmidt
08:31 config GCC back end warmice
08:01 secondary_reload_class brahmaiah vallabhaneni
07:43 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
07:37 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Earnshaw
07:36 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
07:33 Re: Proposed major change to combine Torbjorn Granlund
07:28 Re: Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
07:23 Re: Proposed major change to combine Torbjorn Granlund
06:50 Proposed major change to combine Richard Kenner
06:04 Fortran support for files greater than 2GB on Linux PC Jiri Pittner
02:37 Re: EGCS-GCC Alexandre Oliva
01:31 EGCS-GCC Rafael Rodrguez Velilla

March 07, 2001
22:40 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Colin Howell
22:36 Re: stdbool doesn't work Gabriel Dos Reis
17:48 Re: ld script DJ Delorie
17:46 ld script Yu Xuanwei
17:30 stdbool doesn't work Mike Stump
17:25 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Alexandre Oliva
13:43 Re: profiling and dynamic libraries Andi Kleen
12:13 Re: -Dinhibit_libc Geoff Keating
11:15 empty ChangeLog entry Tom Tromey
11:13 Re: make bootstrap-lean failure Toon Moene
11:00 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mike Stump
10:54 Re: embedded assembly code in c program Michael Meissner
10:45 Re: embedded assembly code in c program tprinceusa
10:23 Re: profiling and dynamic libraries Michael Vance
09:50 Re: c++ static object initialization Fergus Henderson
09:24 Re: c++ static object initialization Janis Johnson
09:11 Re: 2.95.3 update Bernd Schmidt
09:10 profiling and dynamic libraries Theodore Papadopoulo
09:08 Re: 2.95.3 update Thorsten Kukuk
09:07 Re: gcc for windows 98 Fergus Henderson
09:05 Re: 2.95.3 update Bernd Schmidt
08:52 Re: 2.95.3 update Thorsten Kukuk
08:43 libstdc++-2001-02.bz2 not generated in gcc ftp dir Alfred Minarik
08:32 Re: Another exit codes question Chris Reedy
08:17 gcc for windows 98 Iuval clejan
06:27 Which compiler flag ??? Rajiv Guliani
06:14 embedded assembly code in c program warmice
06:13 2.95.3 update Bernd Schmidt
03:35 Boolean optimization robert123

March 06, 2001
22:45 Re: build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) Gerald Pfeifer
22:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
20:28 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:45 Re: gcc in hp-ux11.00/64 bit Bibhas Kumar Samanta
18:36 c++ static object initialization Joel W. Reed
17:26 Re: Snapshots Jeffrey A Law
16:14 Re: make bootstrap-lean failure Gerald Pfeifer
16:11 Re: Wasted effort? Gerald Pfeifer
15:59 Re: build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) Joseph S. Myers
15:50 Re: Snapshots Joseph S. Myers
15:45 Re: build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) Tom Tromey
15:34 Snapshots Jeffrey A Law
15:24 Re: build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) Gerald Pfeifer
15:18 Re: IA-64 Porting Janis Johnson
14:58 Re: Power outage Eric Christopher
14:10 Power outage Jeffrey A Law
14:02 Re: build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) Tom Tromey
13:57 RE: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
13:17 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Richard Kenner
13:13 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
12:55 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Joern Rennecke
12:26 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Neil Booth
12:13 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:21 build failure i686-pc-linux-gnu (today's CVS) nbecker
10:46 Re: Modernizing the access to gcc sources ? Geoff Keating
10:37 Re: Modernizing the access to gcc sources ? Marc Espie
10:34 Re: Modernizing the access to gcc sources ? Jeffrey A Law
10:20 Re: Modernizing the access to gcc sources ? Geoff Keating
10:05 Re: IDT79RC32364, IDT79RC32332/4 Eric Christopher
09:38 Re: gcc in hp-ux11.00/64 bit Jeffrey A Law
09:18 gcc-ss-20010305 is now available law
08:57 Modernizing the access to gcc sources ? Marc Espie
08:17 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John David Anglin
07:50 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
07:45 Re: gcc and real-mode i386 Etienne Lorrain
07:36 Re: Drop VMS? Richard Kenner
05:32 gcc in hp-ux11.00/64 bit Bibhas Kumar Samanta
05:08 Re: handling changes to the front-end interface Nicola Pero
00:27 Re: handling changes to the front-end interface Joseph S. Myers

March 05, 2001
23:32 Re: Linking against unused functions Neil Booth
21:05 handling changes to the front-end interface Fergus Henderson
19:10 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
19:04 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Michael Meissner
18:55 Re: How do I compile in 64 bit mode? John Wehle
18:35 How do I compile in 64 bit mode? Desaulniers, Peter
18:14 Linking against unused functions Rob Emanuele
17:19 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
16:39 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
16:37 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
15:35 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
15:27 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Toon Moene
15:06 Re: How can I specify the timeout for a simulator during make -k check? Kazu Hirata
12:43 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Roland McGrath
12:37 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Per Abrahamsen
11:34 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Neil Booth
11:17 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Thomas E Deweese
10:41 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
09:47 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Carlo Wood
08:39 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Phil Edwards
08:04 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Andi Kleen
07:49 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Fergus Henderson
07:34 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Andi Kleen
06:39 RE: IDT79RC32364, IDT79RC32332/4 David Korn
05:39 0-defined vs. 1-defined preprocessor symbols Jose M. Moya
03:47 Re: xref info Adrien Hernot
03:21 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Mark Kettenis
02:03 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Andreas Schwab
00:54 Question about promoted_input_arg Momchil Velikov

March 04, 2001
23:50 Re: make-error in gcc-3.0-branch Dennis Bjorklund
22:31 Re: Question on unexpected asm output Fergus Henderson
21:24 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:53 Question on unexpected asm output Tim Oertel
19:26 Re: xref info Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: make-error in gcc-3.0-branch Philipp Thomas
15:45 Re: xref info Mike Stump
14:42 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Geoff Keating
14:35 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Neil Booth
14:10 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John David Anglin
14:01 Re: Should we scrap -MG? Geoff Keating
13:59 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John David Anglin
12:10 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
12:09 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
11:59 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:01 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
10:22 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
09:22 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Andreas Jaeger
09:08 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
08:04 Should we scrap -MG? Neil Booth
08:04 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John David Anglin
06:22 Re: Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Geert Bosch
04:54 Re: "Fortran" GNATS entries fortran/946, 1645, 2018 and 2031 Richard Henderson

March 03, 2001
23:41 Re: Downloading and installing Fortran 77 Free Software Tim Prince
23:36 Re: g77 linking problem using LinuxPPC 2000 Tim Prince
23:08 Announcement: SPEC95 daily testing for GCC Diego Novillo
23:00 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
21:11 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
19:34 g77 linking problem using LinuxPPC 2000 Jeffrey Slotnick
18:07 Downloading and installing Fortran 77 Free Software JReinmann524
16:14 Re: xref info Joe Buck
11:18 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure lucier
10:37 Re: xref info Bruce Stephens
10:33 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Richard Henderson
10:10 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
09:49 Re: xref info Joe Buck
09:49 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Alexandre Oliva
09:02 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
08:25 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
06:22 Re: Solaris bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:28 Re: xref info Bruce Stephens
03:27 "Fortran" GNATS entries fortran/946, 1645, 2018 and 2031 Toon Moene

March 02, 2001
22:17 Solaris bootstrap failure Mark Mitchell
18:38 Re: xref info Marc Pawlowsky
17:09 Re: SSE and x86 FP ABI (again) Drew Hess
16:35 Re: xref info Mike Stump
15:57 xref info Marc Pawlowsky
15:52 Re: IA-64 Porting Jim Wilson
10:38 Re: Another exit codes question David Edelsohn
10:23 Re: Another exit codes question Zack Weinberg
10:10 Re: Another exit codes question Zack Weinberg
10:05 Re: initializing eh H . J . Lu
09:58 Re: Another exit codes question Zack Weinberg
09:21 Re: Another exit codes question Andreas Jaeger
09:15 Re: Today's CVS build fails i686-pc-gnu-linux Per Bothner
08:32 Re: Another exit codes question Michael Meissner
08:02 Re: GCC PowerPC usage of LR and CTR David Edelsohn
08:00 Re: Another exit codes question David Edelsohn
07:45 Today's CVS build fails i686-pc-gnu-linux nbecker
07:33 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
07:31 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
07:28 Re: How can I specify the timeout for a simulator during make -k check? Dave Korn
06:31 Re: SSE and x86 FP ABI (again) Tim Prince
06:20 Re: question about arithmetic dewar
05:57 Re: question about arithmetic Alexandre Oliva
05:52 Re: <math.h> Gabriel Dos Reis
05:31 Re: Drop VMS? dewar
05:27 question about arithmetic Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
04:56 <math.h> Magnus Fromreide
04:32 GCC PowerPC usage of LR and CTR Ralph Schmidt
03:47 FIX/FIX_UNSIGNED inconsistency Jan Hubicka
02:33 Re: __builtin_longjmp & early gcc versions Richard Henderson
01:37 Re: initializing eh Olaf Petzold
01:16 SSE and x86 FP ABI (again) Drew Hess
00:12 Re: initializing eh Olaf Petzold
00:10 Re: Drop VMS? Zack Weinberg
00:10 Re: initializing eh Olaf Petzold

March 01, 2001
23:34 Re: Another exit codes question Andreas Jaeger
22:58 Re: gcc and real-mode i386 Bernd Jendrissek
22:52 Re: __builtin_longjmp & early gcc versions Andreas Jaeger
22:45 Another exit codes question Zack Weinberg
22:03 __builtin_longjmp & early gcc versions Fergus Henderson
19:41 Re: gcc CFLAG error Alexandre Oliva
19:36 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
19:31 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
19:20 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Joern Rennecke
19:16 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
19:07 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Joern Rennecke
18:49 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
18:44 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
18:43 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Richard Henderson
18:40 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Richard Henderson
18:36 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Joern Rennecke
18:27 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends John Wehle
16:53 Re: gcc and real-mode i386 John Wehle
15:28 Re: cross gcc-2.95.2 for ARM Nick Clifton
15:06 Re: cross gcc-2.95.2 for ARM Philip Blundell
15:03 Re: Missing mips-tfile dependency in 3.0 branch? John Wehle
14:18 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Phil Edwards
14:11 cross gcc-2.95.2 for ARM bkohlen
14:01 gcc CFLAG error Jim M.
13:50 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Robert Lipe
13:36 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Phil Edwards
13:18 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Robert Lipe
12:20 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Phil Edwards
12:07 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Robert Lipe
11:15 Re: New build breakage on 3.0 branch Phil Edwards
11:14 Re: g++ compile-time regression Phil Edwards
10:04 gcc makefile Jim M.
08:33 Re: initializing eh H . J . Lu
08:19 Re: initializing eh Jason Merrill
08:03 New build breakage on 3.0 branch Robert Lipe
07:57 Re: initializing eh Olaf Petzold
06:38 gcc and real-mode i386 Bernd Jendrissek
05:26 Re: initializing eh Jason Merrill
04:48 Re: initializing eh Olaf Petzold
04:45 How can I specify the timeout for a simulator during make -k check? Kazu Hirata
02:54 Re: initializing eh Jason Merrill
01:56 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Richard Earnshaw
01:39 Unscribe Sven T. Buli
00:37 initializing eh Olaf Petzold


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.7