This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension?
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
>> However, I think we need some kind of unanimous consent before
>> we proceed. Another compromise would be to keep the code
>> (which unlike some other extensions is simple,
>> compartmentalized, well-documented, and safe), keep the
>> !pedantic condition, but add a pedwarn. That way pedantic
>> users just get errors (instead of this rule kicking in, which
>> they likely won't understand) and non-pedantic users get a
>> warning.
>> Thoughts?
Jason> Fine with me.
Nathan, if you care to implement that, go for it.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com