This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension?
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> However, I think we need some kind of unanimous consent before we
> proceed. Another compromise would be to keep the code (which unlike
> some other extensions is simple, compartmentalized, well-documented,
> and safe), keep the !pedantic condition, but add a pedwarn. That way
> pedantic users just get errors (instead of this rule kicking in, which
> they likely won't understand) and non-pedantic users get a warning.
> Thoughts?
Fine with me.
Jason