This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime


On Feb 21, 2001, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:

> The problem solved is that before, every time you upgraded gcc you
> needed to check whether you needed to recompile glibc.

Hmm...  I've been using Red Hat Linux for a while (since 5.0, I
think), and I've always built my own version of GCC (always the latest
stable release), but I have never had to rebuild glibc.  If EH was
broken, G++ regression tests would probably have said so.  But then,
I've always built GCC with a shared libstdc++.  Was this what saved me
from noticing the breakage coming from glibc?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]