This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime


On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 12:54:19PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> Re this: Your point is that now libgcc_s.so is in this category of
> libraries which have to be unique, I think.  Is this or is it not
> adequately handled by installing libgcc_s.so in /lib?
> 

Yes. But who is responsible putting libgcc_s.so in /lib? Say RedHat
8.0 has gcc 3.0.1 with libgcc_s.so in /lib. Now a RedHat 8.0 user
wants to try gcc of the day from CVS or gcc 3.0.2. Will the new
libgcc_s.so be configured/built and where will it be installed? What
if there is a bug in the new gcc which miscompiles libgcc_s.so? It may
bring down the while machine. Do you think Red Hat will recommend the
random users to try new gcc and install libgcc_s.so under /lib?


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]