This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
From: ebiederm at xmission dot com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: 19 Feb 2001 02:10:49 -0700
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>, Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <01021523111501.01075@enzo.bigblue.local> <20010215154529.A1933@valinux.com> <20010216233935.C19905@redhat.com>


> > 3. Install it undr /lib for Linux.
> 
> Yes, but not via gcc's "make install".

Why isn't libgcc installed in /lib for everyone?
Give me an example of a unix system where that isn't the right thing
to do and I'll reconsider.


Eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Marc Espie

References:
- Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]