This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell)
- Subject: Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
- From: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:18:36 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, jbuck at synopsys dot COM, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
>
> >>>>> "Brad" == Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu> writes:
>
> Brad> Perhaps I will eventually just configure things with
> Brad> --disabled-shared. I'm trying to be a good citizen,
> Brad> however, and test gcc without any special configure options,
> Brad> so this is not yet an option.
>
> Or link with -static.
I don't want all the libraries I use linked statically. I just want the
library that I never had to think about before, and indeed, never
noticed before, linked in automatically (whether statically or not).
> Note that your pain is coming from the fact that you are (generously!)
> helping to test GCC. If you were simply to install GCC 3.0, you could
> add the directory to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH once, and be done with it.
My pain also comes from keeping three production versions of gcc on my
alpha box for various purposes and two test versions. In the future,
if this need for multiple versions of gcc for various reasons continues,
I don't see how I will be able to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH once and be done
with it.
Brad