This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -ansi vs. V3
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Subject: Re: -ansi vs. V3
- From: Tom Leete <tleete at mountain dot net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:36:53 -0500
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- References: <200102070120.RAA08414@kankakee.wrs.com>
Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 19:58:52 -0500
> > From: Tom Leete <tleete@mountain.net>
> > To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>
> > Strict ansi C++ should require the use of, eg.:
> > #include <cstdio>
> > rather than
> > #include <stdio.h>
>
> ? What do you mean? Do you mean that stdio.h is not supported by the
> C++ language standard, or what you wish the standard said, or
> something else?
I was reckless in my wording, wasn't trying to speak standardese, nor to
imply what the standard should be.
I was also misled.
Tom
--
The Daemons lurk and are dumb. -- Emerson