This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: -ansi vs. V3

To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
Subject: Re: -ansi vs. V3
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 07 Feb 2001 03:02:54 +0100
Cc: Tom Leete <tleete at mountain dot net>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at nabi dot net>
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010206102828O.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <3A809DCC.F2561566@mountain.net> <20010207121654.B25034@hg.cs.mu.oz.au>

Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> writes:

[...]

| Here at the University of Melbourne we teach our students to always
| enable `-ansi' (or its equivalent in other compilers) unless they are
| making use of non-ANSI/ISO features.

You might porbably recall our discussion about '-iso' on that issue.
What you said corresponds pretty well to a wide spread practice.  It
is just unfortunate that GCC doesn't want to be clear about -ansi or
related options. 

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- -ansi vs. V3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: -ansi vs. V3
  - From: Tom Leete
- Re: -ansi vs. V3
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]