This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch

To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Subject: Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 05 Feb 2001 14:21:35 -0200
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <01020414575601.02353@enzo.bigblue.local><20010203162228Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com><01020414575601.02353@enzo.bigblue.local><5.0.2.1.2.20010205154127.02a9fec0@mail.lauterbach.com>

On Feb  5, 2001, Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:

> Hehe, it probably is appended, but I'm running under KDE2, so
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH contains /usr/lib already :-/

Huh?  There's no reasonable reason :-) to have /usr/lib in
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, unless you want it to be searched before other
directories also listed in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

> I guess dejagnu should actually prepend to LD_LIBRARY_PATH...

Sounds reasonable.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]