This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Regression checking vs. my -shared-libgcc patch
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:57:56 +0100
- References: <20010203162228Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
On Sunday 04 February 2001 01:22, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> The regression checker is very mad at me for the -shared-libgcc patch.
>
> I think it's probably something related to the stuff that Franz
> mentioned about the GNU/Linux PowerPC stuff whereby something is
> undefined in the shared version of libgcc.
>
> Unfortunately, I have no very good way of figuring this out, since the
> regression checker just tells me that the tests fail (not why), and
> since I don't have a suitable system for testing. If anyone else
> would be willing to help out with this, I would be eternally grateful.
It's most probably the shared libgcc thing. I worked around that on linux by
simply removing eabi.S from LIB2FUNCS_EXTRA, since it's not used on linux
unless some -m switch is passed.
I wonder if we need a LIB2FUNCS_SHARED_EXTRA? It seems to me none of the
stuff in eabi.S belongs in a shared libgcc...
BTW, are the -B options honored while searching for libgcc_s? It seems to me
that the libstdc++-v3 testsuite used /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.0 even though a
valid -B was passed.
Franz.