gcc archive
date index for February, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2001
22:25 More binary snapshots Mark Mitchell
19:55 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... dewar
19:51 Re: Deprecating GCC extensions... Fergus Henderson
16:57 Re: g++ compile-time regression Joe Buck
16:48 objc/objc.gperf ? Stan Shebs
15:35 Porting gcc to SimpleScalar David Greene
15:28 Deprecating GCC extensions... Neil Booth
15:20 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Ton Hospel
15:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
13:32 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
12:47 Re: Proposal on how to study g++ compile-time regression and progression since 2.95.2 and initial analysis Benjamin Kosnik
12:01 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
11:36 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:31 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:19 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:13 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:12 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:06 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
11:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
10:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David O'Brien
10:46 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Neil Booth
10:13 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? dewar
09:44 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Mark Mitchell
09:38 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: g++ compile-time regression dewar
09:10 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Mike Stump
09:03 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Earnshaw
09:01 Status of SSE support in current gcc mainline Jan Hubicka
08:32 Re: g++ compile-time regression Carlo Wood
08:21 ? Can't you-know-what James Buchanan
08:02 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Ton Hospel
07:41 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
07:39 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
07:37 Re: g++ compile-time regression Alexandre Oliva
07:30 g++ compile-time regression Carlo Wood
07:07 RE: g++ David Korn
06:39 g++ Kennedy, Chris
06:37 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Daniel Berlin
05:12 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Joern Rennecke
05:09 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Joern Rennecke
05:00 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Nathan Sidwell
03:54 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Richard Earnshaw
03:22 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Bernd Schmidt
03:08 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms [OT] Wolfram Gloger
02:03 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Richard Henderson
01:27 Re: Where I can download the lastest snapshot via Http Alexandre Oliva
01:26 Re: Missing mips-tfile dependency in 3.0 branch? Alexandre Oliva
01:19 Re: libgcc.so.1 Alexandre Oliva
01:14 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Nathan Sidwell
01:12 IA-64 Porting Naveen Sharma
00:55 Where I can download the lastest snapshot via Http Maggie Einstein
00:26 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Alexandre Oliva

February 27, 2001
23:42 Re: Proposal on how to study g++ compile-time regression and progression since 2.95.2 and initial analysis Neil Booth
23:18 Re: RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Daniel Berlin
23:03 RFC -- update_equiv_regs and friends Jeffrey A Law
21:41 Re: ELF Format Craig Rodrigues
21:29 Re: Bug in cse_insn() and emit_libcall_block() Richard Henderson
21:14 ELF Format Swaminathan.PR
20:10 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Gressett
19:44 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Fergus Henderson
19:34 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Fergus Henderson
19:33 Proposal on how to study g++ compile-time regression and progression since 2.95.2 and initial analysis Loren James Rittle
18:15 Re: Bug in cse_insn() and emit_libcall_block() Joern Rennecke
18:04 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Jason Merrill
16:40 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Joe Buck
16:16 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? dewar
16:07 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Jason Merrill
15:59 RE: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite James Mansion
15:53 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? dewar
15:40 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Joseph S. Myers
15:37 Re: Suggestions for GNATS James Dennett
15:09 Bug in cse_insn() and emit_libcall_block() Stephane Carrez
15:03 Re: documentation blur Neil Booth
14:47 Re: documentation blur Jean-Pierre Radley
14:38 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Alexandre Oliva
14:28 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Alexandre Oliva
14:23 Re: documentation blur Neil Booth
13:58 documentation blur Jean-Pierre Radley
13:43 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Neil Booth
13:37 Re: Suggestions for GNATS Joe Buck
13:06 Re: Missing mips-tfile dependency in 3.0 branch? Neil Booth
12:37 libgcc.so.1 Rutkowski, Steve
11:46 signed_or_unsigned_type Roman Lechtchinsky
11:41 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Mike Stump
11:37 Suggestions for GNATS Neil Booth
11:17 Missing mips-tfile dependency in 3.0 branch? Neil Booth
10:43 Re: Submitting patches to gcc-patches Fergus Henderson
10:34 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Romain Dolbeau
10:04 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Erik Mouw
09:42 GCC 3.0 Status Mark Mitchell
08:56 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Benjamin Kosnik
08:54 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Mark Mitchell
08:52 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Ghost in the shell
08:45 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Jason Merrill
08:30 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Mark Mitchell
07:33 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Robert Lipe
07:33 Submitting patches to gcc-patches David Gressett
07:07 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Jason Merrill
07:01 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Gressett
06:40 about reginfo qiulm
06:24 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Nathan Sidwell
04:52 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Jason Merrill
04:43 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Joseph S. Myers
04:14 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:04 RE: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms David Korn
03:51 Re: [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? dewar
02:51 Re: Drop VMS? dewar
02:27 [C++] deprecate overload resolution extension? Nathan Sidwell
02:18 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Korn
02:18 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Korn
01:40 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Nathan Sidwell
01:26 Question_about_targets postmaster
01:05 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Wolfram Gloger
00:53 Re: Drop VMS? Mark Mitchell
00:45 Re: 3.0 Branch Remains Broken Mark Mitchell
00:29 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and--with-as Wolfgang Bangerth

February 26, 2001
23:01 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Robert Lipe
22:52 Re: compile thread program using gcc-2.95.2 on UnixWare7.1.1 Robert Lipe
22:43 Re: Drop VMS? Zack Weinberg
22:27 compile thread program using gcc-2.95.2 on UnixWare7.1.1 log sharp
22:11 Drop VMS? Zack Weinberg
22:04 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Gressett
19:50 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Jonathan Larmour
19:43 Re: build_type_variant() and the restrict type qualifier Gary Funck
17:15 Re: build_type_variant() and the restrict type qualifier Joseph S. Myers
16:51 Re: 3.0 Branch Remains Broken Erik Mouw
16:38 build_type_variant() and the restrict type qualifier Gary Funck
16:32 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Joern Rennecke
16:16 Re: DejaGnu 1.4 release Rob Savoye
16:14 Re: stack pointer adjustment problem Joern Rennecke
16:08 Re: DejaGnu 1.4 release Joseph S. Myers
15:51 DejaGnu 1.4 release Rob Savoye
14:42 stale comment in tree.h - on changing layout of tree nodes Gary Funck
14:30 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Mark Mitchell
14:10 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Jason Merrill
13:19 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Alexandre Oliva
13:19 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Mark Mitchell
13:07 Re: Internal compiler error. Alexandre Oliva
12:09 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Phil Edwards
12:03 3.0 Branch Remains Broken Mark Mitchell
11:58 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Joe Buck
11:49 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Joe Buck
11:41 Re: Wasted effort? Joe Buck
11:24 Re: make bootstrap-lean failure Erik Mouw
10:58 Re: c++ dynamic typecasts... (just nosy) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:44 c++ dynamic typecasts... (just nosy) Axel Kittenberger
09:01 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Mike Stump
08:59 Re: breakage on the 3.0 branch. Jean-Pierre Radley
08:57 More on SUBREG Etienne Lorrain
08:56 Binutils 2.10.91.0.4 is released H . J . Lu
08:38 Re: objc is badly broken Nicola Pero
07:55 Wasted effort? Eric Lemings
07:18 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Gressett
06:52 Re: [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Fergus Henderson
06:35 Re: Simula front-end: Heap-allocated activation records Knut Aksel Rřysland
06:27 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and--with-as Wolfgang Bangerth
06:25 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Robert Lipe
06:14 [C++] float, double & complex template non-type parms Nathan Sidwell
06:10 Re: [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Tim Prince
05:21 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Bernd Schmidt
05:18 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Korn
04:59 Re: How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Erik Mouw
04:53 Re: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 Bernd Schmidt
03:31 RE: Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Korn
02:03 [Q] Configure: Choosing as on Solaris, --with-gnu-as, and --with-as Wolfgang Bangerth
00:04 Grief with Dejagnu; Testing gcc 2.95.3.test4 on SCO OS5.0.4 David Gressett

February 25, 2001
23:28 Re: Still problem bootstrapping 3.0 Neil Booth
20:16 Re: The semantics of `truncate'. Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:43 Re: stack pointer adjustment problem Geert Bosch
18:36 stack pointer adjustment problem Mark Probst
17:49 Re: Still problem bootstrapping 3.0 Carlo Wood
16:59 Re: Still problem bootstrapping 3.0 Andrew Pinski
16:46 Re: Still problem bootstrapping 3.0 James Dennett
16:35 Still problem bootstrapping 3.0 Carlo Wood
15:50 Re: breakage on the 3.0 branch. Jean-Pierre Radley
14:06 Re: The semantics of `truncate'. Toon Moene
13:46 Re: outdated dejagnu information on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html Rod Stewart
13:11 Re: [Fwd: list of installed files] Rod Stewart
12:33 Re: No NRA Bootstrap on Alpha, was: Re: A few SPEC95 results forthe new register allocator Michael Matz
10:53 Re: The semantics of `truncate'. Michael Matz
09:54 Re: Obsolete config files Richard Henderson
09:15 Re: Obsolete config files Zack Weinberg
08:24 Re: breakage on the 3.0 branch. Andreas Jaeger
08:09 Re: breakage on the 3.0 branch. Carlo Wood
07:36 breakage on the 3.0 branch. Robert Lipe
06:20 How can I make ELF library in C++ ? Ghost in the shell
06:13 Re: The semantics of `truncate'. Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:30 The semantics of `truncate'. Toon Moene
05:14 Re: My project dewar
05:10 Re: GPL... dewar
03:45 Both branches are broken Andreas Jaeger
03:30 Re: Obsolete config files Marc Espie
02:56 Re: My project Soubhik Bhattacharya
01:10 GPL... Dream-D-Sign
00:28 Re: Internal compiler error. Frédéric L. W. Meunier

February 24, 2001
21:13 Re: Internal compiler error. Benjamin Scherrey
20:58 Re: Internal compiler error. Craig Rodrigues
20:49 Internal compiler error. Benjamin Scherrey
17:00 Re: -V<version> and libstdc++ Phil Edwards
16:56 Re: -V<version> and libstdc++ Joseph S. Myers
16:43 -V<version> and libstdc++ Carlo Wood
14:54 Re: My project Joseph S. Myers
14:02 My project odeen
13:33 Obsolete config files Zack Weinberg
13:27 Re: Names beginning with '*' Richard Henderson
12:00 gcc.dg/special/weak-1.c failure Laurent Guerby
11:40 Re: outdated dejagnu information on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html Laurent Guerby
11:23 Re: outdated dejagnu information on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html Joseph S. Myers
11:09 Re: outdated dejagnu information on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html Laurent Guerby
10:02 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Daniel Jacobowitz
09:52 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite dewar
09:44 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Geert Bosch
08:17 Re: Cross compilation (fwd) Tim Prince
07:45 objc is badly broken Richard Kenner
06:49 No NRA Bootstrap on Alpha, was: Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Toon Moene
06:35 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? dewar
06:33 Cross compilation (fwd) student
05:46 Re: Bug during installation! Tim Prince
05:33 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:10 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Richard Earnshaw
04:50 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Geert Bosch
04:35 Names beginning with '*' Soubhik Bhattacharya
01:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
00:52 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson

February 23, 2001
22:33 Bug during installation! Pardesi Amitsingh
21:28 Re: reload mucking with my allocation Daniel Berlin
21:12 Re: Making a symbol dynamic in executable Zack Weinberg
20:33 reload mucking with my allocation Michael Matz
19:46 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
19:28 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Michael Matz
18:36 Making a symbol dynamic in executable H . J . Lu
18:16 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
18:03 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Jason Merrill
17:56 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
17:16 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Richard Henderson
16:55 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Mike Stump
16:38 Re: Arg pointer and SSE code Jan Hubicka
16:34 Re: Arg pointer and SSE code Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Arg pointer and SSE code Jan Hubicka
16:10 Re: Series and gcc Mike Stump
16:01 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Jason Merrill
15:11 Re: rtl generation & predicates Joern Rennecke
15:09 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
15:07 Re: Series and gcc Joe Buck
14:33 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
14:31 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
14:26 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Richard Henderson
14:05 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Toon Moene
13:53 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
13:27 [ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE: preprocessor/2074: cpp doesn't emit builtin macros with -E/-save-temps] Neil Booth
13:21 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Diego Novillo
13:17 Re: [Fwd: list of installed files] Craig Rodrigues
13:13 2.95.3test4 bootstrap fails on hpux11-hppa2.0w Dara Hazeghi
13:10 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Toon Moene
13:04 [Fwd: list of installed files] Harry
12:26 Re: SUBREG questions Joern Rennecke
12:09 Re: SUBREG questions Michael Matz
11:38 Re: mknumeric_limits Jeffrey A Law
11:37 Re: rtl generation & predicates Michael Meissner
11:24 Re: Series and gcc Barry Perlman
11:24 Re: mknumeric_limits Alexandre Oliva
11:16 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
11:10 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Jason Merrill
11:08 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08 Re: mknumeric_limits David Edelsohn
11:04 Re: mknumeric_limits Alexandre Oliva
11:03 Re: mknumeric_limits David Edelsohn
11:01 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
11:00 Re: rtl generation & predicates Joern Rennecke
10:51 Re: mknumeric_limits David Edelsohn
10:48 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
10:46 GCC 3.0 - alpha-dec-osf5.0 - proposed patch Greg Freemyer
10:46 Re: mknumeric_limits David Edelsohn
10:46 Re: Question about gcc Alexandre Oliva
10:43 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Michael Meissner
10:05 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Richard Henderson
09:57 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Gabriel Dos Reis
09:52 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
09:32 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Marc Espie
09:30 Question about gcc Pascal Francq
09:29 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Marc Espie
09:14 Re: Simula front-end: Heap-allocated activation records Fergus Henderson
08:41 PA port status on GCC 3.0 branch Jeffrey A Law
08:25 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Fergus Henderson
08:19 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Kevin Handy
08:07 V2.95.3 test4 - Missing Patch Greg Freemyer
07:49 Simula front-end: Heap-allocated activation records Knut Aksel Rřysland
07:41 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Kevin Handy
07:28 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 Robert Lipe
06:20 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Jonathan Larmour
06:03 How to get positional information of a variable declaration? Sung-taek Lim
03:07 Re: rtl generation & predicates Soubhik Bhattacharya
02:55 Re: ia64 unwind thoughts Jason Merrill
02:18 Re: rtl generation & predicates Richard Earnshaw
01:50 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Jamie Lokier
01:48 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Jamie Lokier
01:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
00:46 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 log sharp
00:43 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
00:21 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
00:19 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson
00:13 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Henderson

February 22, 2001
23:56 Re: would you be able to help me out please? Tim Prince
23:40 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 Robert Lipe
23:33 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
23:25 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 log sharp
21:41 Re: SUBREG questions Joern Rennecke
21:02 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Fergus Henderson
21:00 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
20:53 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Doug Gregor
20:37 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Fergus Henderson
20:22 Re: The fourth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available Albert Chin-A-Young
20:16 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 Robert Lipe
20:03 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 log sharp
19:32 Re: mknumeric_limits Jeffrey A Law
19:15 Re: Arg pointer and SSE code Daniel Berlin
18:55 ia64 unwind thoughts Richard Henderson
18:45 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite dewar
18:13 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Jeff Sturm
18:01 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Jeff Sturm
17:38 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
17:28 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Don Bashford
17:18 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
16:48 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Michael Matz
16:48 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Michael Matz
16:43 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Don Bashford
16:36 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
16:28 Re: java bytecode considered bad Michael Matz
16:18 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Michael Matz
15:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
15:49 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Marc Espie
15:48 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Marc Espie
15:32 Re: java bytecode considered bad Trent Waddington
15:31 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Don Bashford
15:21 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
15:09 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Phil Edwards
14:48 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Mike Stump
14:47 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Marc Espie
14:46 Re: Another unrelated SSE patch Richard Henderson
14:46 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Mike Stump
14:32 would you be able to help me out please? nIc nIc
14:07 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
14:04 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Jeffrey A Law
14:01 Re: Arg pointer and SSE code Richard Henderson
13:41 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Geoff Keating
13:40 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
13:40 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Mo McKinlay
13:20 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Toon Moene
13:19 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
13:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
13:02 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
12:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Mike Stump
12:40 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Doug Gregor
12:28 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
11:46 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Phil Edwards
11:23 SUBREG questions Michael Matz
11:22 rtl generation & predicates Soubhik Bhattacharya
10:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Earnshaw
10:45 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
10:22 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
10:08 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
10:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
09:59 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
09:50 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
09:48 Re: can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 Robert Lipe
09:43 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
09:40 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
09:39 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
09:37 Re: Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Jeffrey A Law
09:30 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
08:46 Where is the size max of each mailing list set? Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:42 Re: a regression on 2.95.3 (was Re: How can I submit a large testresult?) Kazu Hirata
08:06 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Oleg Krivosheev
07:41 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
07:33 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
07:26 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
07:25 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
06:57 a regression on 2.95.3 (was Re: How can I submit a large testresult?) Kazu Hirata
06:03 can't build gcc-2.95.2 on SCO OSR 5.0.5 log sharp
05:09 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
04:52 Re: java bytecode considered bad dewar
04:08 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Earnshaw
03:24 Re: How can I submit a large testresult? Bernd Schmidt
02:07 Re: How can I submit a large testresult? Alexandre Oliva
00:42 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
00:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joern Rennecke
00:23 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Neil Booth
00:17 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
00:01 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu

February 21, 2001
23:55 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
23:55 Re: How can I submit a large testresult? H . J . Lu
23:47 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Andreas Jaeger
23:47 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
23:39 Re: How can I submit a large testresult? Kazu Hirata
23:39 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Zack Weinberg
23:37 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
23:24 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
23:24 Re: java bytecode considered bad Gerald Pfeifer
23:20 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
23:19 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
23:18 Re: GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite Fergus Henderson
23:16 Re: How can I submit a large testresult? Alexandre Oliva
23:06 How can I submit a large testresult? Kazu Hirata
23:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joern Rennecke
22:52 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Graham Murray
22:50 GCC Needs a backend cleanup and complete rewrite James Buchanan
22:45 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
22:40 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch H . J . Lu
22:35 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
22:15 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
21:57 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
21:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joern Rennecke
21:03 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
20:53 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
20:27 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
19:46 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
18:51 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Clive Nicolson
18:34 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Fergus Henderson
17:59 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
17:53 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
17:48 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
17:39 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
17:39 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
17:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Per Bothner
17:15 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
17:06 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
16:56 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
16:48 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
16:41 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
16:19 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Linus Torvalds
15:36 Re: CVS1902 preprocessor problem on Linux/ia64 Jim Wilson
15:18 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Per Bothner
15:05 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
15:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
14:54 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
14:50 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
14:49 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
14:42 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
14:41 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Alexandre Oliva
14:36 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
14:30 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Per Bothner
14:22 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Jonathan Lennox
14:21 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
14:04 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Alexandre Oliva
13:50 multiple entry prologues and flowgraph Jan Hubicka
13:45 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Franz Sirl
13:38 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
13:37 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
13:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Geoff Keating
13:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Joe Buck
13:25 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX David Edelsohn
13:24 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Geoff Keating
13:20 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX Geoff Keating
13:10 Tru64: GCC 3.0: libstdc++v3 typecast problem in libstdc++v3/libmath/signbitl.c Greg Freemyer
13:07 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Geoff Keating
13:02 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
12:54 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
12:40 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Kenner
12:36 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Kenner
12:35 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Andreas Jaeger
12:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
12:14 Another unrelated SSE patch Jan Hubicka
12:11 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
12:01 Re: problem with purge_addressof (function.c) Lieven Marchand
12:01 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Jeffrey A Law
12:00 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
11:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
11:58 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Richard Kenner
11:52 Arg pointer and SSE code Jan Hubicka
11:34 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Fergus Henderson
11:29 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
11:27 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
11:15 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
11:14 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
11:13 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
11:04 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David Edelsohn
10:19 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Daniel Berlin
10:11 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
10:04 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc David Edelsohn
10:03 SSE parameter passing patch Jan Hubicka
09:59 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime David Edelsohn
09:50 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
09:41 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Phil Edwards
09:33 loop.c and new fp conditonals infr. again Jan Hubicka
09:25 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Andreas Schwab
09:21 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime H . J . Lu
09:16 The fourth test release of gcc-2.95.3 is available Bernd Schmidt
09:15 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
09:01 RFC: caller_save.c and i386 Jan Hubicka
08:53 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Alexandre Oliva
08:45 Using SSE packed types for complex number arithmetics Jan Hubicka
08:36 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Hidvegi
08:11 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Theodore Papadopoulo
07:56 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Franz Sirl
07:38 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken David Edelsohn
07:20 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Daniel Berlin
07:05 Re: powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Franz Sirl
06:59 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX Robert Boehne
06:44 powerpc-linux: C++ looks completly broken Andreas Jaeger
06:43 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc David Edelsohn
06:33 Re: java bytecode considered bad dewar
06:24 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX David Edelsohn
06:18 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Alexandre Oliva
06:08 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
05:57 Re: java bytecode considered bad Richard Kenner
05:36 Re: java bytecode considered bad Michael Matz
05:21 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Michael Matz
04:49 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Richard Kenner
03:39 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
03:11 Re: java bytecode considered bad Fergus Henderson
02:52 Re: g++, this, more_specialized(), and fn_type_unification() Jason Merrill
02:14 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX Geoff Keating
01:10 Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime Jeff Sturm
00:56 Re: java bytecode considered bad Jeff Sturm

February 20, 2001
22:04 A completely different approach to EH runtime Zack Weinberg
20:11 Re: Unnamed unions Fergus Henderson
20:10 Re: Rerunning CSE after GCSE Richard Kenner
19:09 OT: Interview with Bjarne Stroustrup nbecker
18:26 Re: Unnamed unions Timothy J. Wood
17:17 Re: problem with purge_addressof (function.c) Fergus Henderson
16:21 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX David Edelsohn
15:31 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Toon Moene
15:24 Re: Debugging of clones Daniel Berlin
13:45 What is Int64_t? Used in libstdc++v3/libmath/signbitl.c Greg Freemyer
13:32 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Andi Kleen
12:18 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Richard Henderson
12:04 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Richard Henderson
11:57 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch dewar
11:54 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
11:47 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Geert Bosch
11:37 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
11:36 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
11:28 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Andreas Schwab
11:21 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
11:13 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Bo Thorsen
11:12 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Joe Buck
11:09 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Joe Buck
10:54 Re: CVS1902 preprocessor problem on Linux/ia64 Neil Booth
10:51 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Phil Edwards
10:46 problem with purge_addressof (function.c) Lieven Marchand
10:17 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
10:12 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
10:09 Re: A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Daniel Berlin
10:08 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Geert Bosch
10:00 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
09:34 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Bernd Schmidt
09:20 The current shared libgcc won't work for Linux. H . J . Lu
09:19 java bytecode considered bad Trent Waddington
08:56 A few SPEC95 results for the new register allocator Diego Novillo
08:17 Re: Rerunning CSE after GCSE Bernd Schmidt
04:36 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch dewar
03:19 Re: efficient memory access from assembly Richard Earnshaw
03:05 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Alexandre Oliva
02:21 mips-elf target build failure Toshi Morita
02:20 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Romain Dolbeau
02:13 Re: bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Alexandre Oliva
01:54 Re: mknumeric_limits Andreas Schwab
01:53 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Richard Henderson
01:46 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Richard Henderson
01:43 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 Romain Dolbeau
01:43 efficient memory access from assembly Jeger, Tobias
01:39 Compilation of gcc-20010205 Ryszard Kabatek
01:29 Re: Those pesky incomprehensible if statements Mike Stump
00:40 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Alexandre Oliva
00:37 Re: GCC: support of daVinci graph format Ulrich Drepper
00:35 Re: CVS1902 preprocessor problem on Linux/ia64 Jes Sorensen
00:01 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Russ Allbery

February 19, 2001
23:50 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
23:48 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
23:38 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Geoff Keating
23:24 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
23:23 Re: sh-elf target build failures Toshi Morita
23:21 Re: Inlineing... Alexandre Oliva
23:17 sh-elf target build failures Toshi Morita
22:50 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
22:46 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
22:41 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Alexandre Oliva
21:51 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
21:48 Re: mknumeric_limits Jeffrey A Law
21:46 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Daniel Jacobowitz
21:21 Re: mknumeric_limits Gabriel Dos Reis
20:50 Inlineing... brahmaiah vallabhaneni
19:29 Re: Rerunning CSE after GCSE Richard Kenner
19:09 Re: Rerunning CSE after GCSE Jeffrey A Law
18:31 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
18:26 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Linus Torvalds
18:15 Re: Rerunning CSE after GCSE Richard Kenner
17:16 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Brad Lucier
17:15 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch H . J . Lu
17:04 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Joseph S. Myers
16:39 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Phil Edwards
16:14 libstdc++ FTP dir moved into gcc dir Phil Edwards
16:11 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Russ Allbery
16:11 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch H . J . Lu
16:03 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc H . J . Lu
15:54 Re: mknumeric_limits Benjamin Kosnik
15:24 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
15:10 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Kettenis
15:00 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Kettenis
14:55 Re: Using 'at-pr' for bugs? and maybe patches? Gerald Pfeifer
14:28 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
14:07 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Brad Lucier
14:06 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX Hidvegi
13:56 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Raja R Harinath
13:54 Re: mknumeric_limits Jeffrey A Law
13:21 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Geoff Keating
13:17 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Daniel Jacobowitz
13:02 Using 'at-pr' for bugs? and maybe patches? Phil Edwards
12:56 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Mark Mitchell
12:52 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
12:49 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Phil Edwards
12:39 GCC 3.0 Status Mark Mitchell
12:15 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc H . J . Lu
12:07 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Richard Henderson
12:06 Re: Building g++ 3.0 under AIX Robert Boehne
12:03 Re: mknumeric_limits Benjamin Kosnik
12:01 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
11:58 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Ulrich Drepper
11:58 Problem building libgcc2 on sparcv9 with current GCC Geert Bosch
11:54 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Eric W. Biederman
11:49 Re: mknumeric_limits Jeffrey A Law
11:49 Re: Those pesky incomprehensible if statements Theodore Papadopoulo
11:40 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Eric W. Biederman
11:38 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Eric W. Biederman
11:34 Those pesky incomprehensible if statements Zack Weinberg
11:29 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
11:14 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Mark Mitchell
11:11 Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc Richard Henderson
11:11 Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch Eric W. Biederman
11:09 Re: CVS1902 preprocessor problem on Linux/ia64 Neil Booth