This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: "introduce no new bootstrap warning" criteria. was: Loop iv debugging patch
- To: Robert Lipe <robertlipe at usa dot net>
- Subject: Re: "introduce no new bootstrap warning" criteria. was: Loop iv debugging patch
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:38:00 +0100
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <14941.2331.949024.263257@taniwha.paradise.net.nz> <u84rz5uiu9.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de> <20010112075537.A8978@rjlhome.sco.com>
Robert Lipe wrote:
> About a recent patch, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Bootstrapping gcc I get:
> > /cvs/gcc/gcc/doloop.c:60: warning: static declaration for `doloop_condition_get' follows non-static
> For some compilers, this is a hard error and breaks the build.
"Zachte heelmeesters maken stinkende wonden".
> I'm not going to fuss about the commit in question. But in recent
> years, a LOT of effort has been spent on getting the warning level in
> a full bootstrap down to a manageable number. (Thanks, Kaveh!)
Not only that, but real bugs have been fixed because they showed up once
it became practical to add -Wall to the bootstrap flags.
If people are really interested, I can dig up the first one.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)