This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:08:12 -0800
- Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Robert Lipe <robertl at sco dot com>, libstdc++- at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20001230160338.A3505@rjlhome.sco.com> <20001231000529.C20493@disaster.jaj.com> <fld7e84uiv.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010110010817.A5394@disaster.jaj.com> <20010110014205.A5535@disaster.jaj.com> <flg0irvqug.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:55:19AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Maybe, it is time to add -iso to mean iso9899:1990 for it is somehow
> counterintuitive not to recognize -std=c90 (== c89) AND recognize
> -ansi as -std=iso9899:1990. That is just inconsistent.
I thought we'd gotten them all the same. There must be
lingering specs losage, or it was broken afterward.
There will be no -iso option. That's what -std=c89 is for.
I suppose I don't care if we add a c90 alias. ;-)
r~