This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fortran candidate patches for gcc-2.95.3.
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Fortran candidate patches for gcc-2.95.3.
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:19:09 +0100
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012101654130.970-100000@host117.cygnus>
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Toon Moene wrote:
> > Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > To be honest, I don't know yet. What kind of failures are these? Do they
> > > (or are they likely to) occur in real-life code?
> >
> > Well, surely they do - we wouldn't know of them otherwise :-)
> Well, it does happen that someone spots a bug in the source and constructs a
> matching testcase ;)
> Do you know which programs are affected?
> > The FFE patch enables code to use the FPUTC intrinsic (in libU77); this
> > is the least important of the two, because the bug doesn't lead to
> > miscompiled, but running code.
>
> So this is an ICE on valid code?
Yep.
> > The libf2c patch fixes reading of some NAMELISTs, which is of the form
> > "runs, but produces wrong results".
>
> Thanks; but it's still not quite a detailed enough description. What are
> NAMELISTs (sorry, I don't know Fortran), what exactly are we doing
> incorrectly, and how does your patch fix the problem?
>
> Who is the Fortran maintainer these days?
Well, strictly speaking there is more than one Fortran maintainer (see
the MAINTAINERS file). However, I tend to act like *the* Fortran
maintainer - in the sense that I try to reply to GNATS bug reports,
gather bug fixes, etc. The NAMELIST bug is described by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2000-11/msg00932.html
> I don't fell I know this code well
> enough to judge these patches properly. I'm especially a bit nervous about
> the second patch - it doesn't seem to be installed in current CVS, so it
> probably didn't get sufficient testing yet.
Both patches are in the current CVS - the latter one only since
yesterday, so - yes - it hasn't have a lot of testing yet.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)