This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: LANGUAGES vs --enable-languages (was: Testsuite documentation)
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: LANGUAGES vs --enable-languages (was: Testsuite documentation)
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at NUXI dot com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:52:39 -0800
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <001a01c058eb$6e346420$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4> <Pine.BSF.4.30.0011280952040.8748-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-To: obrien at NUXI dot com
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:04:47AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Tim Prince wrote:
> > I've been confused myself on the --enable-languages and where it is meant to
> > work. Even if that is used, the LANGUAGES option is useful to avoid
> > building those components which cause bootstrap to fail;
>
> This is exactly what --enable-languages is for, according.
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/>.
Last I tried, I had trouble building only the C compiler from CVS
sources. (you may remember our discussion on that) At the time doing
the grep implies that only CHILL, c++, f77, java and objc are valid.
Which could be taken to mean that the C compiler isn't.
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)