This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Do I have a bad version of gcc?
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rlau at csc dot com
- Subject: Re: Do I have a bad version of gcc?
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:20:55 -0800 (PST)
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> From: rlau@csc.com
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:06:10 -0600
> Does anyone know whether gcc version 2.96-54 or 2000-07-3 is bad?
Yes, I know. The answer is no, it is not bad. That is the compiler
your vendor recommends and uses. It contains many advancements over
the FSF's 2.95.2 compiler. It just doesn't happen to be the current
FSF released compiler. The current FSF compiler is gcc 2.95.2.
> If this is an unstable version, which one should I download.
It should work fine. If you wanted to, you could grab gcc 2.95.2 and
use it.