This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2
- From: c958179 at student dot dtu dot dk
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:40:32 +0100 (MET)
- cc: Erik Mouw <J dot A dot K dot Mouw at ITS dot TUDelft dot NL>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
I am not an exprienced unix user. Therefore I am getting confused.
Can't you be more specific? Then I will be very delightfull.
What should I do after I unpacked egcs-1.1.2 full distribution package in
a directory called egcs-1.1.2?
And I don't have any previosly installed cc compiler.
Sabit
On 29 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2000, c958179@student.dtu.dk wrote:
>
> > #mkdir objdir
> > #cd objdir
> > #srcdir/configure [target] [options]
>
> > with the respons:
>
> > #No match
>
> You're actually supposed to replace objdir, srcdir, [target] and
> [options] with whatever is appropriate for your site. objdir is
> supposed to be the name of a temporary directory in which you're going
> to build GCC. srcdir is the directory containing the source tree.
> [target] is the optional flag specifying the target platform for which
> the compiler should generate code. If you omit it, GCC will generate
> code for the platform on which it's being built. [options] is a list
> of configure-time options you can use to customize GCC. Run
> `configure --help' in the top-level and in the GCC sub-directory for a
> relatively complete list of the options, but also check the docs.
>
> > ***The command 'cc -o conftest -g conftest.c' failed
> > ***You must set the environment variable CC to a working compiler "
>
> > How can I set the environment variable CC to a working compiler?
>
> If you've already got an installed compiler, for example, an older
> version of gcc, Use `setenv CC gcc' or `CC=gcc; export CC', depending
> on which shell you use. If you don't have a compiler, you must
> download a pre-compiled binary in order to be able to compile GCC
> yourself.
>
> > Do you think I can use GCC 2.95 for the same purpose?
>
> It's very likely that you'll find the C++ support in GCC 2.95.2 far
> better than that of egcs 1.1.2.
>
> --
> Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
> CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
>